MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Address Missing Hydraulic Placard?

3/2/2020

26 Comments

 
NFPA 25 requires a legible Hydraulic Information Sign.

How do I replace a missing Hydraulic Placard (or calculation plate/card) on an existing system? And what if there isn't original design information available?

I'm curious to see how others are addressing this deficiency.

​​​​​​​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
26 Comments
Matthew King
3/2/2020 10:14:16 am

The insurer usually wants/photos the placard. Find out who the previous owners were and track down the insurer

Reply
Jonathan Griffin
3/2/2020 10:14:19 am

Your choices:
1. Find as-built submittals that have the Flow Summary Sheet available (from the client hopefully)
2. Perform an analysis of the piping system and hazards; and then obtain a fire flow from the nearest Hydrant, then perform a calculation of your own. Use this information to fill in the placard.

Reply
Dan Wilder
3/2/2020 10:23:24 am

We follow this method as well but in the absence of original design info, we will preface that if the design does not calculate (for a flow test deficiency or an occupancy that does not work with the installed sprinkler system), we will not provide the placard.

Reply
NK
3/2/2020 10:52:13 am

Do you use the most current edition of NFPA 13 or do you use the edition of NFPA 13 that was used at the time of the original design/installation?

Jeremy James
3/2/2020 10:26:02 am

As a contractor, we often run into this issue after an inspection. Typically, we would approach the owner for as-builts, but they are rarely onsite (if there's no placard, you probably won't find a print). We would offer the service of a designer to reverse layout the system with a field survey and then perform a calculation for the placards. This can become pricey for the customer, depending on the structure and if pipe is exposed or above ceilings.

Reply
Rz
3/2/2020 11:22:51 am

Since you only need the require gpm and psi at the base of the riser can’t you perform the hydraulic calculation without a flow test and save the customer some monies
This data is needed for your drain test

Reply
Imran Mahmood
5/5/2022 12:53:03 am

We have the original calculation sheet but placard is missing.
How much will be the cost to install a placard.
Thanks
Imran

Reply
Jonathan Joseph
3/2/2020 11:17:04 am

If you cant track down the prints through the company that installed, or AHJ.

I would field survey design as Jeremy said.

Perform a Flow Test with a pitot reading for GPM's and residual pressure, Identify all sprinklers, hazards, occupancy for a head calc. The layout of sprinklers should be easy to confirm the spacing since typically designers will max everything out.

The important thing is to get new numbers at the riser location. Hopefully you can dig up some former flow test to compare.

Reply
Peter
3/2/2020 03:00:39 pm

Why do you need to perform a flow test? You're not providing a curve. NFPA 25, 2014 and later requires that the system have a hydraulic data plate on it if it is pipe scheduled or hydraulically calculated and that plate be secure and legible. NFPA 13, 2013 25.5.2 doesn't require flow test info either. The hydraulic data plate dictates the requirements of the system. Additionally, most hydraulic data plate signs don't have a spot for the water flow test information, I know the ones we use don't. The general information sign has information about the water flow test.

As an aside, we do the same as what most others describe above. Ask for a copy of the As-Built records first. If those aren't there, we survey the building by popping ceiling tiles, cut in to drywall or get into attics (this is a messy and costly endeavor) and reverse design the hydraulic need. This has been interesting, because in some cases after modifications to the spaces (like office remodels, tenant build outs) where hydraulic calculations were not performed by the tenant improvement contractor, we've caught where the psi at the base of the riser to provide for the system is now > 100psi and there is no fire pump on the system. We usually see this when contractors just keep adding heads on to small diameter piping like 9 heads coming off 1" pipe. Those have been less than fun conversations with the owner.

Reply
Jonathan Joseph
3/2/2020 04:28:15 pm

I don't think you are getting the original question and concern.

How do I replace a missing Hydraulic Placard (or calculation plate/card) on an existing system? And what if there isn't original design information available?

25.5.2 (2016) The sign shall include the following information:
(1) Location of the design area or areas
(2) Discharge densities over the design area or areas
(3) Required flow and residual pressure demand at the base of the riser
(4) Occupancy classification or commodity classification and maximum permitted storage
height and configuration
(5) Hose stream allowance included in addition to the sprinkler demand
(6) The name of the installing contractor


Peter
3/2/2020 04:39:09 pm

Jonathan,

I think we may be misunderstanding each other here. The question asked was how to re-create the sign. I was stating that you don't need to perform a flow test to re-create the hydraulic information sign. As both you and I stated the relevant section of NFPA 13, it doesn't state the requirement to place a flow test on the sign.

Reply
Jonathan Joseph
3/2/2020 06:39:51 pm

Correct LOL

This whole thing can be costly especially if its old. Hopefully there is an attic or exposed on the upper level to make it a little easier to survey the system.

I just have a feeling AHJ is going to want everything updated.















Reply
Dan Wilder
3/3/2020 07:29:26 am

@NK

Without some specific information such as the year of the adopted code when the system was approved, any agreements/acceptance alternatives/exclusions based on the original install, we perform the analysis based on the currently adopted codes adopted by the AHJ. However, we are very specific to state that the design does not constitute an engineering review of the entire system for compliance (spacing, hanging, bracing but if we see issues while performing the original agreed upon scope of work, we will write it up separately under due diligence), we are simply providing a hydraulic placard for the assumed hydraulically most remote area.

We are not (unless it's in our approved scope) reviewing the entire building's installation compliance. Most owners don't want anything more than the minimum to get them their continued CofO.

Reply
Mike
3/5/2020 01:58:01 am

How or why would you need to provide a hydraulic calc plate if the system was pipe scheduled?

Reply
Peter
3/5/2020 06:22:22 am

Starting with the 2014 edition of NFPA 25. If the system is pipe scheduled, there needs to be a hydraulic information sign that says it is pipe scheduled.

See NFPA 25, 2014: 5.2.6.2

Adding a sign that says it is pipe scheduled is problematic because you can't really just look at a system and ensure it is pipe scheduled. The only way we will say a system is pipe scheduled is if we find plans that show it was pipe scheduled. Considering NFPA 13 has required systems to be hydraulically calculated for quite some time, by nature those pipe scheduled systems would be quite old and thus the plans for it could be difficult or impossible to locate. If we can't find the plans, we calculate the system.

Reply
Ramon
5/21/2020 11:16:14 pm

You can do a survey and find out if it is a pipe schedule system or not... Just by looking the pipe...

antonio
8/16/2021 02:40:45 pm

so, can we assume if the building is pre 2014 a Hydraulic name plate is not necessary ?

Mike Magwire Sr.
8/18/2021 11:05:47 am

I am interested in your reply to Antonio's recent question as to the
pre 2014 requirement for hydraulic data plate.

My question pertains to a system built in the mid 80's.
Is it required by the NFPA 13 to have this is place or are we
grandfathered?

Reply
Peter
8/18/2021 11:34:17 am

For some reason I can't "reply' to Antonio's comment as the button doesn't appear.

From my understanding of the language and the intent, is that if the state, municpality, and/or AHJ has adopted the 2014 or later version of NFPA 25, then you must retroactively add a hydraulic design information sign. If the system was not hydraulically calculated originally, then installing the sign and writing "Pipe Schedule System" on it is sufficient.

Since NFPA 25 is a retroactive standard, it is applied to all systems, regardless of when they were installed (even if it was in the 1980s or earlier). This can be problematic as though even the system may have been installed prior to hydraulic calculations being available or required, you still need to do the research. Often with these older buildings, we just calculate the system as we can't find copies of old plans let alone any plan that indicates it was definitively pipe scheduled.

Reply
Daniel H Raap link
12/17/2021 01:31:03 pm

Hello - I have a related question with a healthcare client (hospital) that has Sprinkler Systems installed form the early 1970's. They keep receiving Deficiencies for not having a Hydraulic Name Plate on the sprinkler system.

I believe there system is Pipe Scheduled and will be verifying that shortly. In the meantime, since CMS currently has adopted the 2012 Edition of NFPA 101 and in turn also the 2011 Edition of NFPA 25, and this is what The Joint Commission follows for their accreditation standards for Healthcare Facilities; if the requirements for Hydraulic Placards first became a requirement in 2014, is this still required or can the deficiency be removed entirely or at least moved into a recommendation category instead of a deficiency? Thank you! Daniel Raap

Victor Griffith
5/13/2025 10:11:38 am

over 40 year old building, is it required to have a Hydraulic Data Plate for sprinkler system.

Reply
Naveed
10/12/2021 05:28:40 pm

Related question: We have some old buildings with domestic water line coming and then splitting into fire and potable water lines. Now we are bringing in separate fire water and need to know flow rate and pressure required for the sprinkler line. No as-built, placard is available. How can we find the required info? Is there a simple way to do it?

Reply
Mark link
10/11/2022 02:42:36 pm

We are missing the placard for the Sprinkler System Control Valve riser. Every attempt has been made to contact and locate paperwork. Everything is negative. New Insurance carrier requiring we replace placard. What would it cost and who would I go through tp have this completed?

Reply
Joe Meyer
10/12/2022 10:28:01 am

Hi Mark,

Typically the best place to start is a local fire sprinkler contractor or a local consulting firm who has a Fire Protection Engineer onboard.

My guess is that you'll have more luck getting pricing and capable parties with a local fire sprinkler contractor. They'll have to trace the system and "reverse engineer" what is already there into a new set of calculations for the placard.

Hope this helps, thanks!

Joe

Reply
Peter
10/12/2022 02:43:35 pm

If you can't locate sprinkler drawings of the existing system you'll need to have the sprinkler system re-calculated. This can be relatively easy or incredibly complex depending upon a multitude of factors. For example, a 3 story residential building has a relatively simple calculation procedure, but it may mean making access holes if there is no attic space to see the direction of the pipe, pipe type, pipe size, etc.

Reply
Bruce Powelson
12/30/2022 05:45:57 pm

The system was installed 2011. I have a print of the approved plans from Department of Building Micro fiche signed off with approval stamps and hydraulic information on the face sheet. I have contacted the installing contractor by using their license number. Our insurance Company wants a Hydraulic Plate. The original contractor wants $450.00 for the plate, which seems a little like black mail. Are there any alternatives.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT