MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Fittings, Couplings from Different Manufacturers?

10/29/2021

20 Comments

 
We are completing the build of a 95,000 sqft, 2-story facility. The sprinkler installers are using two manufacturers of fittings and couplings.

Our construction specifications require the fittings, couplings, and gaskets to be from the same manufacturer.

They have installed fittings (elbows, tees, etc) from one manufacturer with couplings from another, and vice versa, in multiple areas. I am concerned that any issue later on with that condition could be problematic with liability. 

I understand there are specifications and tolerances the manufacturers must meet - but is this an issue?

I am the AHJ as well as the owner (this is a state building). Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
20 Comments
Alex
10/29/2021 06:59:20 am

Hi Anonymous,

What the are two manufactures? I personally do not see an issue with having two different fittings as long as they both conform to your specifications. The only issue I see down the line is replacement parts.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Dan
10/29/2021 08:08:21 am

Victaulic and Anvil. I have since learned that these are basically Viking.

Reply
Alex
10/29/2021 08:36:14 am

Hi Dan,

I wouldn’t have a problem with that. Like Michael said below, the real concern with different manufactures pertains to CPVC.

Good luck on wrapping up your project!
Alex

Greg
11/2/2021 04:00:37 pm

As far as I am aware Victaulic strongly discourages, if not possibly does not allow this

Glenn Berger
10/29/2021 08:07:22 am

Should not be a problem as long as both products are listed by a nationally recognize testing lab.

Reply
Michael
10/29/2021 08:09:34 am

Typically, it is only a real issue when it pertains to CPVC. Due to some of the solvents that one manufacture may use to adhere piping may not be compatible with the other. As long as they are FM (approved) or UL (Listed) I wouldn’t think it would be a very large deal with steel or iron materials. They should all go through a similar listing and testing process. However, If you know the manufactures of the fittings and couplings you could reach out to the respective companies and see if they have an field incidents where other manufactures were non-compatible for any reason.

Reply
RJ
10/29/2021 08:11:15 am

What you have said in your question answers it for you. 'Our construction specifications require the fittings, couplings, and gaskets to be from the same manufacturer.' If you are not going to have the installers follow the specifications, why have specifications?

Reply
martin moffitt
10/29/2021 01:33:55 pm

Totally agree and why did it take this long to relize the cotractor was not adhering to the specifications in the contract?? not looking to beat anybody up

Reply
HJ
10/29/2021 08:37:15 am

Construction specifications are given for a reason. Your contractor would have based their project bid on those specifications, and agreed to follow them by signing the contract. As the AHJ, you may have the authority to amend your agency's construction specifications, if necessary.

Reply
Jack G
10/29/2021 08:43:00 am

Mechanically they should work as they are built to the same spec.
Problem will arise where coupling and fitting ( grooved) are not the same, and there is water damage. Good luck collecting on that.
Years ago, I had leaks on schd 40 pipe , seamed pipe, where the water leaked along the seam, under the gasket. I had to take pipes apart, clean lackered coating off, smooth out seam, and put back together. I used a Vic fit end cleaning tool.
The supplier and manufacturer argued that grooved couplings were not approved for schd 40 seamed pipe, only threading and welding.
My cost was about 5 grand, which the supplier paid.
Be careful mixing approved/ listed products.

Reply
Jesse
10/29/2021 08:45:26 am

Usually it isn't an issue. A lot of branded products are manufactured by third parties and labeled differently.

As long as the same standards are being applied. For instance, Victaulic's IGS isn't compatible with others.

Reply
Kellery
10/29/2021 09:11:37 am

While as long as they are using apples to apples, it should be a problem as others have stated they would be manufactured to the same spec.
But your job specs call for same products, although being both property owner and AHJ you could accept.
My concern would be how the warranty is written, some products say you can only use same manufactured products.

Reply
Todd Wyatt
10/29/2021 09:11:49 am

This is a contractural issue for the Owner (e.g. the State) to determine if this "noncompliant" Work is acceptable. The Contractor is required to provide the Owner with the Project per the Contract Documents (Drawings and Specifications). Most Specifications provide the Contractor instructions to request a substitution during the submittal process. If the Contractor skipped this step, submittal the "noncompliant" products, and they were reviewed and accepted, the Owner still has authority (depending on the Specifications submittal language) to require the Contractor to provide fittings from a sole source. The Owner can also accept the "noncompliant" Work as is. I would recommend reviewing the warranty information as it may be voided if all fittings are not from a sole source.

Reply
CJ Bonczyk
10/29/2021 09:12:03 am

You should have the contractor provide you with the technical data on both the coupling being used and the fittings. You can request that the contractor provide a letter from the manufacturer for both products that there is no installation warranty and or compatibility issues of the items being mixed during installation. If both manufacturers state that there is no issue you are fine. If they bring up anything regarding warranty/compatibility/integrity then you can easily argue your case. Additionally the contractor signed a contract and provided a scope. Review those items as they are bound to what they agreed to and if they chose not to follow it you have every right to make them adhere to the requirements as outlined in the execution specifications.

Reply
Matthew Signes link
10/29/2021 09:26:22 am

For Installation of Victaulic End Caps with Victaulic Installation-Ready Couplings:
• Victaulic Installation-Ready couplings shall be used with specific types of Victaulic end caps. These end caps are identified by markings that are listed below. Always verify that the proper Victaulic end cap is being used.
• When assembling a Victaulic Installation-Ready coupling onto a Victaulic end cap, verify that the end cap is seated fully against the center leg of the gasket.
For full installation requirements, always refer to the specific instructions in this handbook for the Victaulic coupling.

For Victaulic Style 009N Couplings
• Use only Victaulic FireLock™ No. 006 End Caps containing the “EZ” marking on the inside face or Victaulic No. 60 End Caps containing the “EZ QV” marking on the inside face.

For Victaulic Style 607 Couplings
• Use only Victaulic No. 660 End Caps with the “QV” marking on the inside face.

For All Other Styles of Victaulic Installation-Ready Couplings for the Original Groove System (OGS)
• Use only Victaulic No. 60 End Caps containing the “EZ QV” marking on the inside face.

https://www.victaulic.com/assets/uploads/literature/I-100.pdf

Reply
Chad
10/29/2021 09:46:16 am

From one AHJ to another… unless you want to enforce the contract specs (assuming the brand was spec) it’s not a code issue… unless improperly installed as other alluded to.

You also should ask… did they have supply issues or are they using up old stock from a previous job. Only way that would be an issue is if the Vic fittings gaskets are old and dry rotted

Reply
Dan
10/29/2021 09:59:19 am

We did have a meeting with the Architect, Contractor, Engineering firm, and sprinkler installer. The specs came from the architect/engineers and became a concern for me when I saw what was being installed versus what was submitted. The warranty is one year from substantial completion no mater what was used.
There are obviously supply issues across all trades and things we use in our own lives. This was an issue for the sprinkler installers as they had to use 2 different suppliers that carried one or the other but not both. All parties agreed that this should not be an issue.

I appreciate the all of the comments and thank you Joe for the opportunity to have a place to ask the questions.. I have learned a lot about the manufacturers and the process in the last week.

Reply
David Kendrick
10/29/2021 10:39:53 am

This is restating information from your original question statement.

If you have a failure at a coupling / fitting connection where the manufacturers are different, who gets sued?

If you specified something and the installing contractors justification is "similar", well that is not the same.

This only comes from experience and personal opinion.

Reply
JackG
10/29/2021 02:01:20 pm

If I correctly remember, Vic coups and fittings , you do not have to torque the bolts on the couplings. Anvil couplings, and anyone else’s, you do.
So why would you mix and match. Asking for trouble in my opinion.

Reply
Eric
11/3/2021 11:35:41 am

As a side issue to this concern, be aware that grooved fittings from different MFGs in particular having different equivalent lengths for hydraulic calculations. Newer design programs utilizing BIM processes allow the designer to pick a specific MFG when placing fittings in the sprinkler piping model. The fittings are then included in parts lists for ordering and included in the hydraulic calculations.

The software designers for these programs go to great lengths to fill their material catalogs with the proper equivalent lengths based on the MFG spec sheets. This is a great boon for getting more accurate calculations and fabrication reports, but if the designer uses one brand of fitting for the calcs, and purchasing buys another one with a worse Equiv Length you could have a pretty surprising change in pressure loss by the time all the fittings are added together!

Point is, as digital technology encroaches more into this industry, everyone will have to pay closer attention to just how the design of a system is being calculated. Computers are great, but everyone knows the saying "garbage in, garbage out"

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT