MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Fire Pump that Won't Flow 100% in Annual Test?

7/18/2019

11 Comments

 
Existing building with a vertical in-line fire pump that has not been tested in the last 5-6 years. The fire pump is fed from a water storage tank where the top of the tank is roughly 12-15 feet above the fire pump.

The fire pump is rated 55 psi at 500 gpm. There is about 60 feet of 4-inch main that connects the discharge side of the fire pump to the fire pump test header. This stretch of main also includes at least 6 elbows and a tee. The test header has two 2-1/2" connections.

With a hose monster and 15-feet of hose connected to the pump test header, we are only able to flow about 400 gpm out of the test header. At this flow rate, the suction side fire pump gauge reads -20 psi and the discharge reads 25 psi.

In short we are not getting the 100% flow (of 500 gpm) or the rated pressure (of 55 psi).

I can see some flow being restricted due to the long run from the pump room to the building exterior, but are there other issues I'm not thinking about here that would cause this? Obstruction in the main perhaps? Any tips on actually getting the flow up to 100%? Thanks.

​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Mike
7/18/2019 08:05:59 am

What size/TDL is the piping from the tank to the suction side of the pump?..

The tank elevation is giving you about 5 psi of suction pressure which should give you enough NPSH...but if the pipe is too small or there are check valves on the suction side, you won't get the flow needed.

Reply
Justin
7/18/2019 10:32:28 am

Mike the suction side pipe is 3" and there is a check valve right after the 90 coming from the wall then a 90 immediately down to the pump level.

Reply
Colin Lusher
7/18/2019 10:42:35 am

Justin, you just solved your problem....3" suction is WAY to small for a gravity tank suction supply of a 500 gpm pump. Its even too small for a pressurized suction supply....NFPA 20 requires a minimum 5" suction line for a 500 gpm pump. You'll need to increase the suction size to 5 or 6" in order to be in compliance with NFPA 20, and I guarantee this will solve your issue. I would also remove the check valve....check valves are prohibited within 50-ft of the suction side of a fire pump.

Colin Lusher link
7/18/2019 10:36:41 am

It sounds clear to me that the problem is on the suction side of the pump. At -20psi on the suction side of the pump, the pump would be experiencing some pretty heavy cavitation (you'll hear the sound of the pump change when the suction pressure drops below about -5 psi...popping/crackling sound), which is not an acceptable condition for pump operation.

With a gravity tank, and a 4" suction line, I'm guessing you're loosing whatever gravity head the tank provides with the friction loss in the 4" line. I ran into this exact same problem early in my career, and even with a low gpm pump (250 gpm in my case), we had to increase the suction from the gravity tank from 4" to 6" in order to flow the pump at 150%.

Look into the following: How long is your 4" suction line? Are all the valves on the suction line wide open? What is the water level in the gravity tank? Your solution will likely be the answer to one of these questions. Worst case, you'll need to increase the size of the suction line to the pump if the run of 4" pipe is too long.

Reply
Justin
7/18/2019 10:50:43 am

Thank you Colin, I will have to let the individual know what we have come up with and what we think would be the solution.. I would like for them to be covered as well as me since this particular pump is covering a middle school..

Reply
Colin Lusher
7/18/2019 10:58:45 am

Good luck Justin.

Yes, they absolutely need to resolve this issue as their pump is essentially useless without fixing this.

And I would definitely mention to them that the installing contractor did not install a code compliant system. This pump would never have passed it's original acceptance testing, so the original installing contractor AND the pump supplier are responsible here for faulty design and workmanship.

Dan W
7/18/2019 10:57:15 am

Does the pump have any 5" or greater pipe on the suction/discharge side?

Visually check the water height in the tank, could be a bad float valve.

Can you see inside the tank for any growth (vortex plate obstruction), color of the discharge water may also show an issue (green or brown)

Exercise any OS&Y's into a verified closed (verify by bleeding off pressure) then open position (pressure should return), the pin to the disc may have sheared off. Flowing water (no pump) may also show a difference in the before/after if the disc is only partially moving.

Can you verify the correct power is getting to the motor (can be done at churn)?

The length isn't helping anything, so if an internal inspection of the impeller & piping yield nothing and the power is correct, then a pipe size increase may be next.

Reply
Mike
7/18/2019 11:05:04 am

Start with Table 4.27(a) Summary of Centrifugal Fire Pump Data (U.S. Customary) for 500 GPM pump


Min. suction is 5"
Min test header should be 4" but only if 15 ft of supply is used.

3 problems:
1. Test header should be 6"

Per NFPA 20, 4.21.3.4 Pipe Size. The pipe size shall be in accordance with
one of the following two methods:
(1) Where the pipe between the hose valve header and the
connection to the pump discharge pipe is over 15 ft
(4.5 m) in length, the next larger pipe size than that
required by 4.21.3.1.3 shall be used.

2. suction should be 5" min.
3. Suction pressure is too low

4.15.3.2* The requirements of 4.15.3.1 shall not apply where
the supply is a suction tank with its base at or above the same
elevation as the pump, and the gauge pressure at the pump
suction flange shall be permitted to drop to -3 psi (-0.2 bar)

How did this system even pass inspection or testing the first time?

Reply
Doug
7/18/2019 12:13:33 pm

I would also check the power supply to the pump and make sure the pump has the power needed and that it is turning in the proper range.

Reply
pjd
7/18/2019 12:43:10 pm

Justin, I just wanted to add that when the cavitation occurs that Colin described above, what is happening essentially is that pressure in the suction line has dropped below the vapor pressure of the water, which varies based on its temperature. At 60 F, which is about ground water temperature, the vapor pressure of water is around 0 psi absolute, which translates to around -15 psi gauge. At or below that pressure, the technical description of what occurs is that the water boils at 60 F, and it undergoes a phase change from liquid to vapor (steam). This vapor is sometimes referred to as "low-quality" steam, at least in the power generation world, because there is very low energy in it. The droplets that make up the steam are relatively densely packed, they are larger and have more mass than the droplets in steam at higher pressure and temperature. The steam particles formed by cavitation impact the pump impeller vanes at its tangential velocity at the radius of site of the impact, and cause pitting in the brass material. Repeated for a long enough time, operating a pump in a cavitation condition will destroy the pump. That is why the NPSH required is listed on the manufacturer's pump curve, and it is especially important to pay close attention to it in suction tank and in cascade vertical turbine pump installations.

Reply
Mike
7/18/2019 03:32:48 pm

@PJD

Thanks for the scientific explanation. Learn something new every day here.

Michael

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT