MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Fire Protection Options for Air-Supported Dome?

10/10/2022

25 Comments

 
I am an architect working on a project where we're construction an air-supported structure (dome) for a school district to use as their physical education gymnasium.

The fire marshal here wants the dome fire suppressed.

I told him we cannot hang water piping from the dome.

What are the options to provide fire suppression inside of a air supported structure that is 180 x 135 feet?

Are there alternatives, like water cannons along the perimeter? If so, what kind of costs might that suggest?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
25 Comments
Ray Hardy link
10/10/2022 08:06:35 am

Fill it with Nitrogen?

Reply
Franck
10/10/2022 08:46:49 am

That could be problematic for the students ;)
Not to speak about the prohibitive cost of such a system in such a volume.

Reply
matt
10/10/2022 08:19:15 am

Can the structure be deflated/turned off? What happens if the air is turned off?

Reply
Ralph Giro
10/10/2022 08:25:56 am

There is usually a metal framing system to help hold the fabric in place. I would start by consulting with the supplier of the fabric dome material to get their suggestions. This is not uncommon.

Reply
Doug link
10/10/2022 08:33:34 am

Questions:

Will the suppression system use heat detection? What happens when the heat is high enough to set off the suppression system?

If the heat has degraded the nylon roof, will the roof collapse on the crowds of people inside, trapping them?

Would flame detection be better than heat detection?

Reply
Glenn Berger
10/10/2022 08:39:28 am

You will need to work with the AHJ on this one. Provide fire suppression in the dome will not happen. But, fire protection would be required in the supporting areas.

Reply
Todd Wyatt
10/10/2022 08:46:43 am

You state that the “fire marshal here wants the dome fire suppressed.” An authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) are required to enforce and interpret the adopted Codes, they are not permitted to require Projects to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system (ASPS) because they “want” it unless the Code requires it.

The first step would be determining the Occupancy Classification (OC) for the “air-supported structure (dome) for a school district to use as their physical education gymnasium.” If this air-supported dome structure is for a school for K-12, it could be classified as Group R Educational. Per its assembly use, it could be classified as Group A-3 Assembly (gymnasiums w/o spectator seating) and/or Group A-4 Assembly (viewing of indoor sporting events with spectator seating).

Per 2021 IBC Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems, Section 903 Automatic Sprinkler Systems identifies when buildings/structures require an ASPS based on their OC.

903.2.1.3 Group A-3
An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-3 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-3 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 12,000 square feet (1115 m2).
2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.
3. The fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.

903.2.1.4 Group A-4
An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-4 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-4 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 12,000 square feet (1115 m2).
2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.
3. The fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.

903.2.3 Group E
An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group E occupancies as follows:
1. Throughout all Group E fire areas greater than 12,000 square feet (1115 m2) in area.
2. The Group E fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.
Exception: In buildings where every classroom has not fewer than one exterior exit door at ground level, an automatic sprinkler system is not required in any area below the lowest level of exit discharge serving that area.
The Group E fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.

In all (3) OC, 12,000 SF and an Occupant Load >300 are required parameters for an A-3, A-4, or E to be protected with an ASPS. If your “air-supported structure (dome) for a school district to use as their physical education gymnasium” does not meet either of these requirements, an ASPS is not required regardless of the AHJ’s “preference.”

Please review Section 3102 Membrane Structures for other non-ASPS requirements.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
10/10/2022 08:51:13 am

180 feet x 135 feet = 24,300 SF > 12,000 SF

ASPS would be required for A-3 and A-4 but perhaps not for E.

Reply
Franck
10/10/2022 08:52:47 am

As Glenn indicated, it would be more than problematic to provide a water-based fire protection system inside, for several reasons:
- the main one is that there is normally no structure to support the weight of piping, or even to attach the pipes
- the second one might be related to the fabric itself that may not sustain heat and would either burn or open above the location of sprinklers, thus not being able to operate the thermal sensitive element.

Gas protection system is not an option for such a large volume.

But it could be advisable to provide at least some kind of fire detection system (beam detection) as you can normally find a way to locate them inside the structure. This is not a fire suppression system, but at least you will have an alarm that will enable to call the fire department and evacuate the structure.

Reply
Greg
10/10/2022 09:22:05 am

One of the ways to explain to the Fire Marshal why sprinklers are complicated in this scenario is the tent material, the suppression angles and the height. Sprinklers are designed to operate within the jet plume of a fire, but the angle presented by the walls of dome create a more likely scenario where the fire will challenge the dome's fabric material ahead of sprinkler activations. This, in combination with the angles needed to suppress with traditional sprinklers make their presence in approximately 2/3rds of the tent impractical. For the 'ceiling' area, the remaining 1/3 is typically too high for the anticipated combustible load to anticipate the jet plume will come near enough to activate the sprinklers. They are likely published studies with similar rational, funded for evaluation of government use of such structures. There is manufacturer who has a water cannon pictured as part of their advertisement, in Arizona https://arizonbuildingsystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Fire-Protection-Systems-in-Air-Structures.pdf This was a study of sprung structures, government funded. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/801337 Air supported structure challenges the conclusion reached in the sprung study, but it's the information within the report that is important in this conversation.

For no-water solutions; (1) occupancy use agreement. (2) air-smoke sampling system

Sprinkler any attached or exposing hard structure.


Reply
Alex
10/10/2022 11:29:40 am

Hi,

I am extremely curious regarding the architectural/structural design of this dome. I'm sure that is where the AHJ is stuck as well.

I was at a local SFPE event last week where presenters discussed virtual reality within construction. This may be a good project to experiment with the new technology. If I were the AHJ, I wouldn't only be concerned with fire suppression but notification, the dome collapsing, if the dome is on backup power, fire rating of the dome, etc.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Jesse
10/10/2022 12:12:47 pm

This one has me stumped. I've been a part of many of these types of projects and I don't recall AS protection being a part of ay them.

Reply
Connor
10/10/2022 12:39:57 pm

Another consideration is the flexibility and movement of the fabric dome structure. If it were somehow possible to hang the pipe in the first place, the flex of the dome could deform the piping or even cause it to come apart. I would imagine the hazard presented by 3" pipe and fittings falling on a soccer field would warrant consideration.

Reply
Dan Wilder
10/10/2022 01:08:09 pm

We've completed one of these is the past with a mix of fixed and manually elevated water powered oscillating monitor nozzle towers, typically in 6 locations (corners and center edges) with a manual override. We did provide sprinkler protection in the connecting egress tunnels (they had a metal scaffold like framework).

It was a lot of water....

Reply
Shahpoor Khosravi
10/10/2022 03:34:35 pm

In case you cannot convince the AHJ that the sprinkler is not needed, my suggestion would be to provide monitors with beam detection systems so you would not need to hang pipes from the structure.

Reply
Brian Cockburn
10/11/2022 09:47:20 am

Even if it's possible to hang sprinkler pipe from the dome; what happens when the dome is deflated for maintenance, or there's a power outage, or the blowers fail?

Reply
David Williams link
10/11/2022 10:00:52 am

The Convention center in Pittsburg uses a "soft" roof. Their solution was to use beam detectors and an automated spray nozzle monitor type system like you would use around petroleum tanks or ships. (I think I was in there 15-20 years ago).

I looked at doing this for a large tennis facility dome, but the project was shelved due to energy code and emergency power required for dome inflation.

Reply
Brett
10/12/2022 06:54:18 am

As an AHJ, I will say, this AHJ doesn't know what they're talking about. Early detection and evacuation I can fully support. Fire suppression, no. Ask him to provide code references and actual example projects where fire suppression was provided in a similar structure.

Reply
Bill
10/12/2022 08:46:10 am

2018 IBC Section 3102.4 Allowable floor areas. The area of a membrane structure shall not exceed the limitations specified in Section 506.
I'm not finding an exception to providing sprinkler protection for a membrane structure anywhere in the IBC. Not saying there may not be acceptable alternatives in some jurisdictions, but to imply an AHJ doesn't know what they're talking about doesn't seem like the best approach either. I believe the code fully supports that position.
It also appears the group has provided projects that were able to meet the intent of the requirement.

Reply
Brett
10/12/2022 09:11:23 am

Bill, I apologize if my comment was harsh. However, in my 20+ years in this field, there are many people (AHJs, Architects, and Engineers) who require things from a position of misunderstanding or ignorance. A more measured response from an AHJ facing such resistance should be to reassess their position. Additionally, I was quick to respond and was merely considering an air supported membrane structure or tent. I did not consider a structure which has membrane portions as sometimes used as architectural elements. In those instances, fire suppression systems are commonly used throughout the structure. However, I've never seen an air supported structure nor a tent style membrane structure with a fire suppression system throughout.
NFPA 101 chapter 11 (using the 2018 edition) covers special structures including permanent membrane and temporary membrane structures as well as tents. Within that chapter there are no requirements for suppression systems. The only suppression related requirement is for portable fire extinguishers. Instead, the code takes the approach of doing everything possible to prevent a fire from occurring including requiring separation within 10 feet of the inside and outside of the structure for membrane structures and 10 feet from outside of a tent structure.
If a fire were to occur in the area within the structure, yes, fire suppression would be nice to have to allow for occupant egress. However, there are so many problems with trying to install a reliable, cost effective system that the project would likely be scraped. However, early detection would provide a much more cost effective solution to providing timely egress of occupants in an emergency. And yes, NFPA codes do consider cost as a factor for an AHJ to consider.

Bill
10/12/2022 09:26:12 am

Brett, although I don't disagree with the benefit of early detection, I'm not sure how you can disregard a requirement from an AHJ perspective. Chapter 11 of the 101 addresses the special structures, such as the one in question, and 11.1.8 specifically requires sprinklers based on the occupancy chapters that would apply.

Bill
10/12/2022 09:36:28 am

Sorry. It should have been 11.1.1

Tom W
10/12/2022 12:03:42 pm

We just finished one up for the Football Hall of Fame in Canton, OH. The use group was listed as an A-3 and under the Ohio Building Code, we are allowed to exclude sprinklers where "Areas used exclusively as participant sports areas where the main floor area is located at the same level as the level of exit discharge of the main entrance and exit." There were 3 auxiliary buildings within the dome itself that we had to install sprinklers in but not the actual dome. I do know they had to have low pressure alarms for the dome in the event of an air loss that would notify the fire dept, as well as smoke detectors and pull stations. The FD did want us to add a few hose valves on the outside of the auxiliary buildings in the dome, but that wasn't a big deal.

Reply
HJ
10/13/2022 08:48:02 am

There are some relevant special provisions in NFPA 1(2018 Ed.):

NFPA 1:13.3.2.7.2 Any building containing one or more assembly occupancies where the aggregate occupant load of the assembly occupancies exceeds 300 shall be protected by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 as follows[...]

NFPA 1:13.3.2.7.3 The requirements of 13.3.2.7.2 shall not apply to the following:
(3)* Locations in stadia and arenas as follows:
(a) Over the floor areas used for contest, performance, or entertainment, provided that the roof construction is more than 50 ft (15 m) above the floor level, and use is restricted to low fire hazard uses
(b) Over the seating areas, provided that use is restricted to low fire hazard uses
(c) Over open-air concourses where an approved engineering
analysis substantiates the ineffectiveness of the sprinkler protection due to building height and combustible loading

Reply
Terry
12/13/2022 08:16:58 pm

My company is currently providing fire suppression solutions for the Mercedes’ Benz and Alamo Dome Stadium. We’re currently working on a system for a soccer stadium in Hong Kong. Water cannons are being used along with sprinkler systems for the MB & AD stadiums. The stadiums are used for other activities such as Monster truck events where fuel is stored in the middle of the fields. The water cannons were added as additional fire protection for these stadiums. I’ve also been approached for a basketball facility such as you describes with seating capacity for 3,000 occupants. The structure cannot support a fire suppression system; however, water cannons can be an option when interconnected into automated fire alarm system.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Jan 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT