MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Exact Source Point for Hydraulic Calculations?

1/17/2020

9 Comments

 
Where exactly does a hydraulic calculation need to end? 

When we run a hydrant flow test, there's a static/residual hydrant and a flow hydrant. I regularly run my hydraulic calculations from the building, through the service main, to a street main, and then up the tee'd branch that serves a hydrant so that my source point is exactly at the elevation of the static/residual hydrant. I do this so that I make sure to account for the proper elevation of the water supply.

Most other hydraulic calculations I see will end wherever the building's service main intersects with the street's supply. Is this correct? Wouldn't that place the source at an elevation lower than what the hydrant indicated is available?

Wondering what the proper way is that I should be precisely calculating systems. Thanks in advance.

​​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Brian Gerdwagen FPE
1/17/2020 10:22:05 am

The source of the hydraulic calculations should coincide with the flow test. If the public main was flowed, and it is circulating, ending the calc at the public main is fine. Otherwise, you need to prove back to the hydrant where you had the gauge. That is the point at which you measured the residual pressure at the flow rate from the flow hydrant.

Reply
Colin link
1/17/2020 10:59:44 am

I agree this is good practice, with one clarification; if you are in a situation that requires you to prove flow back to the flow test hydrants, I would place the hydraulic calculation source at the point where the static/residual pressure hydrant underground lateral connects with the larger underground supply main, and adjust the static and residual pressures for the elevation difference between the gauge and the ug main.

For example, if an 8" ug main supplies a test pressure hydrant via a 6" lateral pipe, I would end the calculation at the point where the 6" hydrant lateral tee's off the 8" main. It doesn't make sense to me to carry the calculation all the way back to the gauge at the hydrant outlet, as that is not an accurate representation of how the system is actually flowing....there is no water flowing through the hydrant lateral, the flow is through the 8" main.

Would you agree? Interested to hear thoughts on this....

Reply
Wayne Ammons
1/17/2020 11:06:11 am

I think we posted at the exact same time Colin! I believe your good explanation is in line with what I was trying to say.

Colin link
1/17/2020 11:19:13 am

Yep! Same exact idea Wayne; agreed!

Alex
1/17/2020 10:36:23 am

I think your rationale is defensible. For example, if the tee to the test hydrant is at sea level and the point of connection to the site is 10 ft above sea level, the calculation would calculation would be neglecting 4.33 pounds of elevation loss.

However, the friction losses through large diameter city mains are negligible over relatively short distances, so the elevation for the hydrant connection could be inputted at the site connection point to account for the more noteworthy pressure loss.

Reply
Wayne Ammons
1/17/2020 10:59:44 am

I don’t have the opportunity today to look through some reference material to see if there is guidance in black and white, but for the purposes of calculating the sprinkler system, the flows and pressures available at the hydrant outlet itself will be available at the underground connection point for the hydrant, correct? To calculate all the way through the piping and fittings for the hydrant itself would be a more conservative approach, but unnecessary since the water for the sprinkler system is not being drawn from the hydrant outlet, it’s being drawn from the water main the hydrant connects to.

You do have to account for the difference in elevation from the test hydrant to the site, but I input that elevation at the water main connection for the hydrant. As Brian stated above, you also need to know if the water main is circulating or dead-end to ensure you locate the flow test effective point properly.

Reply
Colin link
1/17/2020 11:02:01 am

Agree 100% with this method Wayne...no need account for looses through the hydrant lateral as that is not how the system will actually flow.

Reply
raymond
12/10/2021 12:17:32 pm

Does anyone have any NFPA references to show proof to plumbing engineer?

Reply
COLIN
12/10/2021 02:37:49 pm

Unfortunately, I'm not aware of anything in NFPA clearly indicating exactly where the source should be placed. But a plumbing engineer should be able to understand the concept of placing the source at the location where the pressure hydrant connects to the city main, with pressure adjusted for the difference in elevation between the hydrant and the underground main. This is the location where the flow is being measured when you perform a flow test.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​May 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    Aba
    Ada
    Asce-7
    Asme-a171
    Astm-e1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    En-12845
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire-detection-and-alarm-systems
    Fire-dynamics
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    Fm-global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    Icc500
    IFC
    Imc
    Ipc
    Irc
    Iso
    Means Of Egress
    Nbc
    Nfpa-1
    Nfpa-10
    NFPA 101
    Nfpa-101
    Nfpa-11
    Nfpa-110
    Nfpa-1142
    Nfpa-1221
    Nfpa 13
    Nfpa-13
    Nfpa-13d
    Nfpa-13r
    Nfpa 14
    Nfpa-15
    Nfpa-16
    Nfpa-17a
    Nfpa-20
    Nfpa-2001
    Nfpa-214
    Nfpa 22
    Nfpa-220
    Nfpa 24
    Nfpa-241
    Nfpa-25
    Nfpa-25
    Nfpa-291
    Nfpa-291
    Nfpa-30
    Nfpa-30b
    Nfpa-33
    Nfpa-400
    Nfpa-409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • JOIN
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT