I understand if a duct is wider than 4-ft (1 m) that there needs to be a sprinkler under the duct.
But what if the duct is just below the ceiling? Does a sprinkler also need to be above the duct? I have a group of ducts with a combined with of 16'-6" (5 m) with the highest point of the duct 10 inches (25 cm) under the ceiling. Does there need to be a sprinkler above and below the ducts? Thanks in advance. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Anthony
1/31/2024 08:07:30 am
Plain reading of code says yes. You might be able to convince an AHJ that its not necessary in non combustible construction. A few points to keep in mind: the possibility of a fire inside the duct, more probable activation of the sprinkler due to the height, and the protection of the structure in relation to escape time for the occupants.
Reply
Patrick Drumm
2/2/2024 12:06:12 pm
Anthony, which code section would you be referring to? My initial thought was the answer to this question is no, because you are covering floor space, but I could be convinced if I had a code reference or specific language to reference.
Reply
Patrick Drumm
2/2/2024 12:20:42 pm
Apologies Anthony, with a little more thought I think I understand where you were going. You're probably asking, "If the duct is 10" below the deck and spanning 16'-6", how do you meet the 1" to 12" deflector below ceiling requirement for unobstructed construction, or the 1" to 6" below the structural members up to a maximum distance of 22" for obstructed construction. In that case, how to you meet the deflector requirements? Code dictates heads above and below, but I understand all the commonsense arguments against below.
Reply
Glenn Berger
1/31/2024 08:24:02 am
This is a simple case of needing to evaluate the obstruction caused by ductwork with respect to sprinklers to the side of the obstruction.
Reply
Amod kumar Singh
1/31/2024 08:38:43 am
following
Reply
Dan Wilder
1/31/2024 08:40:27 am
What hazard and how deep are the ducts?
Reply
Franck
1/31/2024 09:44:13 am
With the duct only 10 in. below the ceiling, you will have problems to provide your pipes and sprinklers on top of it + hangers...
Reply
Jesse
1/31/2024 10:23:53 am
It would be good to know the building construction. If this is a NC building and the duct is up at the deck, I don't see a benefit in protecting above it. The duct will inhibit the spray pattern from developing.
Reply
Dave
1/31/2024 11:00:48 am
I agree with Franck here (when would I NOT agree with Franck?), You are protecting the floor area, not the top of the duct. Once the obstruction exceeds 4 ft wide, it becomes problematic. Even if you did have the 18 in. to develop the spray pattern above, that is a large shadow area below the sprinklers. Is there any space (or can you negotiate a space) between the individual ducts? I have sometimes been allowed to use the fairly new 9.5.5.3.1.2(2) (2019 ed.) placing a pendent sprinkler between and just below the ducts not more than 3 in. from the edge(s) of the obstruction(s).
Reply
DE
1/31/2024 01:46:11 pm
Agreed 100%. Just a note, if you do use that section, the sprinkler needs to be intermediate type. Got caught on that before!
Reply
David Rowe
1/31/2024 11:38:57 am
One of the sprinkler vendors did a webinar a couple of years ago addressing this question and I think he made a good point. Where's the heat going to go? Obviously heads above the duct are seriously obstructed, but if the heat bypasses the heads beneath, how long might it take for those heads to eventually actuate? But if the heat gets to a head above the duct, even though it may not provide good coverage, at least we set off a flow switch and get the fire department rolling.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop January '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
February 2025
PE PREP SERIES |