MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Does 175 psi Limit Apply at FDC for Standpipes?

11/23/2022

12 Comments

 
NFPA-14 2019 Edition. There is a new section in NFPA 14 - Section 7.8.1.2.1:

The pressure required at the fire department connection for manual standpipes shall not exceed the working pressure of the system components of the standpipe system or sprinkler system when the system is a combined system.

Does anyone have any idea why this was added?

It seems to me that the maximum pressure at the FDC would be 175psi as this is what the sprinklers are rated.

Pumping at that pressure I would never get the 100psi required at the top of the most remote riser.

Or am I interpreting this section incorrectly?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
Dan Wilder
11/23/2022 07:43:31 am

My best guess (and I've done this before using 200PSI on a 750GPM combined standpipe) and needed 180 at the base.

NFPA 1901 for Fire Pump Trucks and their pump ratings has information up to 250PSI. A designer could use the higher rating to keep a manual standpipe fed via FDC vs having to go to an automatic standpipe and incur the cost of a pump. Truck engineers don't really care about (at least it's not the primary thought) component rating, if the hose guys ask for more pressure, they are getting more pressure.


It's in PI 34 - https://www.nfpa.org/assets/files/AboutTheCodes/14/14_F2018_SPI_AAA_FRReport.pdf

Public Input No. 34-NFPA 14-2016 [ New Section after
7.8.1.2 ]
7.8.1.2.1
The pressure required at the fire department connection for manual standpipes shall not
exceed the working pressure of the system components of the standpipe system or sprinkler
system when a combined system.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Some contractors have been calculating all 4" standpipe systems and bulk to the FDC and
indicating that the PSI required at the FDC is IE: 245 PSI. (Report from Denver). This is on non
high rise combined systems. The PSI required at the FDC should not exceed the pressure
ratings of the system components for manual standpipes.

Reply
Dwight Havens
11/23/2022 08:31:14 am

Essentially, this means that if the standpipe is combined with a fire sprinkler system, and the required pressure to operate the standpipe is greater than 175 psi, the components of the sprinkler system that are not rated for pressures greater than 175, need to be upgraded. This is one reason that sprinklers listed to pressures greater than 175 psi were developed. The alternate is to pipe the sprinkler systems and standpipe systems separately.

Reply
Alex
11/23/2022 08:41:13 am

NFPA 14 (2019) 7.2.1 states the "maximum pressure at any point in the system at any time shall not exceed 400 psi".

Therefore, if you have a standpipe system protected with PRVs, you are allowed to pump at greater pressures. You need to ensure that any component not rated for pressures above 175 psi is installed downstream from a PRV to prevent failure.

Reply
Matthew King
11/23/2022 01:03:18 pm

If you put in PRV and have an overpressure event., you will not have fire protection. That violates fundamental precepts of code, protect life and property, noting life is first. That's why they limit source pressure to the pressure of the lowest rated pressure of any component in the system. Another way to look at it, if you need more than 175 psig, then you have designed outside of code - look at you hydraulics ( pipe size) and zone design, adjust accordingly.

Reply
Jonathan Joseph
11/23/2022 09:27:57 am

For a manual standpipe system the maximum floors you would exceed in height is typically 8 stories just below the 75 feet so to get a 100 psi residual pressure on the roof or top landing you can keep all components on any part of the combined system under 175 as long as the fire pumper operator does so.

Reply
DAVE
11/23/2022 11:02:18 am

I haven't gone back through the committee discussions, but in AFSA Russ Bainbridge's January 7 article for "Sprinkler Age" on 2019 changes to NFPA 14, he states:

• Section 7.8.1.2 removes the wording “topmost” and replace it with “of the hydraulically most remote 21/2-in. (65-mm) hose connection valve.” This should help alleviate some confusion when calculating the system to clarify the most remote outlets should be calculated.

• Section 7.8.1.2.1 is being added which opens the door to manual system designs that exceed 175 psi inlet demand.

– “The pressure required at the fire department connection for manual standpipes shall not exceed the working pressure of the system components of the standpipe system or sprinkler system when the system is a combined system.”

• Sections 7.10.1.2.1 and 7.10.1.2.2 remove the wording “topmost outlet” and replace it with “connection point.” This should help alleviate any confusion about whether NFPA 14 is requiring two 21/2-in. outlets to be installed at the top of standpipe systems and which outlets should be calculated.

https://www.sprinklerage.com/nfpa-14-2019-edition/

Reply
Kelsey
11/23/2022 11:15:08 am

And it might be below 175psi as well. If my FDC is at ground level, but my systems go below ground, I might have to have a maximum of ~150psi at the FDC.

Reply
Eric R
11/23/2022 11:46:49 am

This is one of those code sections that shouldn't need to exist, but does because someone messed up a design using way to much 4" pipe, and then tried to rules lawyer their way out of the mistake by saying this very requirement wasn't explicitly stated in the code.

My state has gone even further and limited the max pressure at the FDC to 150psi for manual standpipes.

I just ran a super quick calc on two 70' tall standpipes separated horizontally by 130'. The demand comes out to 750gpm @ 150psi even when both 70' risers are limited to 4" pipe, with 4" pipe running the 130' distance between the two risers, and only utilizing 6" for the common piping from FDC to the first standpipe tee,

Obviously an abstract layout, but it really shows that there is no good reason to design a manual standpipe that needs pressures higher than 175 psi.

Reply
Mark Bagniewski
11/23/2022 12:17:23 pm

One reason this could have been added is for the firefighting side of the system. Depending on the jurisdiction, the FDC is either going to be a 2.5” connection, or a 4/5” stortz connection (large Diameter hose). One of the big issues with LDH is that they only have a service rating of 225 psi max. That rating is more for the actual hose. The weak point of the hose is the stortz connection to the hose. When you operate LDH at that sort of pressure, the hose normally does fine, but the hose will blow off the connection, and send the hose flying.

As for the 2.5” connections, these hoses can operate at higher pressure, but the stress of the hose weights and gravity pulling on these FDC connections at a 90 degree angle a few feet off the ground with connections that are usually just left outside in weather with little protection can also fail.

Just speculating as to why it might be added.

And PS as an FPE and a fire officer, we do enjoy speaking to the FPE when they design buildings in our area. The more information you can provide us in regards to your design, the better off we can utilize the systems when needed. And that goes for the guy pumping into your system, the guys hooking up to your system, and the fire officers managing the incidents and utilizing your systems.

Reply
Danial Bartle
11/28/2022 12:37:28 pm

When I was at the FD, the LDH was never supposed to be used for anything other than supply to the truck from the hydrant. They started adding 3" intake pipe and Stortz connections to pump the hose primarily to set up a relay from distant water supplies and the pressure was always 150 psi for the maximum flow of the pump. I haven't kept up with the NFPA requirements for fire hose but I would hope the pressure tests of the 4 and 5" hose has been adjusted for increased pressures for Stortz connections at FDC's.

Reply
Danial Bartle
11/28/2022 12:39:22 pm

Sorry, "intake" should be spelled "discharge".

Anthony
12/5/2022 12:18:06 pm

This one is always hilarious to me on several levels:

If the fire truck can produce 200 psi you can best your bottom dollar in an emergency all 200 are going to be used.

Also we test the sprinkler system at 200 psi. So what every sprinkler is invalidated for use or has experienced over pressure before the system is put into service? Obviously the components can withstand higher pressure than they are 'rated' for. I think most sprinklers are tested at 300 psi at the factory?

175 always just seemed arbitrarily less than the test for the system.

Also funny to me is that any time the fire department hooks up to a manual system and over pressurizes it the relief valve will start flowing. This may prevent the most hydraulicly remote valve from getting all the pressure it requires.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT