MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Do Window Sprinklers Need Separate Zone?

9/15/2021

11 Comments

 
I was hoping to get some feedback on whether interior Special Application Window Sprinklers would require a separate zone from the remainder of the floor fire sprinkler system?

I do not see any provisions that would require separate zoning per NFPA 13 nor the IBC. However, I can see why it would be important to zone these areas separately seeing as the intent of the window sprinklers is to maintain the integrity of the fire rated separation (as opposed to actively suppressing the fire).

Thanks in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Alex
9/15/2021 07:19:14 am

HI Anonymous,

To answer your question, I haven’t heard of a requirement for window sprinklers to be installed on a separate zone.

I do want to note, that when you are installing window sprinklers, you are still only designing for a single zone to operate at one time. Installing sprinklers on a separate zone does not allow for two zones to operate simultaneously (of course any heads will open when heated, but the system is not designed to produce the flow or pressure required).

An additional zone may be requested by the fire department to indicate the location of the fire via the flow switch and FACP, but that’s all I can think of.

Thanks,
Alex

(PS, take a note of NFPA 13 (2019) 9.3.15 which states that your “water supply duration for the design area that includes the window sprinklers shall not be less than the required rating of the assembly”. This is important where window sprinklers may be installed in an office where the duration is typically 30-60 minutes and the assembly may be 2-hour)

Reply
Paul G
9/15/2021 08:21:38 am

To only add personal experience to the above, when applying with a smoke control system, typically for atrium which provide an exception for sprinklers on glass in lieu of 1-hour barrier, they may need to be zoned with the atrium sprinklers or separately depending on the requirements of the Rational Analysis. The requirement stems from appropriately zoned sprinklers for activation of the smoke control systems. The engineer of record for the rational analysis or smoke control system would be able to answer this question and would not be on the sprinkler designer to determine alone.

Reply
Glenn Berger
9/15/2021 08:18:23 am

The standard answer is that a separate zone is not required. Separate zones may be required if the sprinklers are being furnished to cover fire rated openings.

Reply
James
9/15/2021 08:19:28 am

The only scenario I've ran into is when the window sprinklers were used for a stairwell/atrium separation. This separation needed window sprinklers as it was a 2-hour separation and not just 'closely-spaced-sprinklers' to meet an atrium separation.

The sprinklers on the atrium side needed to be zoned together because the waterflow switch was used to activate the smoke control system (among other things).

Reply
Jesse
9/15/2021 08:52:46 am

For window sprinklers, no. There is no specific requirement these be zoned separately.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
9/15/2021 09:17:11 am

The only thing I could/would add to the previous comments would be that separate zoning may be desirable for hydraulic purposes. I assume these sprinklers are being provided as a means to maintain rating per NFPA 13 "Sprinkler-Protected Glazing", if so the demand of the "window sprinklers" should be added to the fire sprinkler demand ONLY if adjacent to the remote design area. I would argue that you would MAKE this area possibly the remote area by adding it to the ceiling level sprinkler demand, but that's a debate for someone on the 13 committee to make I guess. So long story short, IF your "window sprinklers" are adjacent to your remote design area by chance, don't forget you will need to add the two demands together and balance. That becomes a lot easier to do if you have them zoned, or at least fed separately so you can adjust pipe sizing and help them balance easier. You don't want to beef up your entire system just because your overall design area doesn't balance correctly or is inefficient. Also, don't forget that IBC, NFPA 13, and the cut sheets should be consulted for all the appropriate requirements. More often than not (in my experience), architects/engineers attempt to use these in non-compliant situations to avoid the expensive fire rated glass. From memory, they cannot protect operable doors/windows, they cannot protect glass in a load bearing wall/assembly, no protruding horizontal mullions are allowed, unless sprinklers are located below every mullion, deflector must be located at top level of glass (not inches or feet above glass at ceiling), and plenty of other requirements to boot. The cut sheets of both availably listed heads for this use even tell you to check other applicable building codes and standards, or something along those lines. Lots of ways to misuse these heads other than the way they were listed and intended for. Be careful and remember, if you are the contractor, don't be afraid to let the design team know when these heads are being used outside of their listed/intended purpose. Sorry for the long winded message! Good luck!

Reply
Brian Cockburn
9/15/2021 09:52:46 am

Thanks for asking this. I've been wondering about it too.

Does anyone know if window sprinklers are ever allowed to be on a dry zone? I always see them on wet zones even in underground parking garages that then require the piping to be heat traced.

Reply
ken Thackery
9/15/2021 10:14:43 am

Are they listed for dry systems? Always best to consult an FPE.

Reply
Brian Cockburn
9/15/2021 10:31:36 am

The Tyco WS sprinklers are listed for wet only, or deluge in exterior applications. I was curious if there are window sprinklers listed for dry systems.

Franck
9/15/2021 03:00:16 pm

As quite often, a possible answer is : it depends

All the following is my personal opinion.

The standard (Nfpa 13) does not require a separate system, but does not prevent it as well.
There are some good comments for separate systems listed above, such as balancing the system or having a “fire barrier” that is somehow independent from the sprinkler system (as a fire door / fire wall is a passive protection, independent from the active sprinkler protection).

Then you can use common sense. If the window protection is provided to protect from an outside exposure, it may be on the same system as the sprinklers inside the building. The aim is to avoid that an external fire could activate sprinklers inside the building. I would anyway suggest to provide a valve to possibly isolate the piping to the windows sprinklers in that case : if you activate the system and open heads, you don’t need to impair your entire building protection until you change the open sprinklers.
If the aim is to provide a rated fire separation inside a building, it would be advisable to have a separate system : in case of sprinkler impairment in the building, you still have a 2h fire rating for your separation.

But this is not required by the standard. Just common sense.

Reply
Wyn Hinkel
10/29/2022 11:35:11 am

Whether the sprinklers (window) are on separate zone or NOT,the water is Still drawn from the same source.Why can’t a system be designed with appropriate volume to include glazing sprinklers on same zone.Heat buildup starts at ceiling level with heads at higher elevations than window sprinklers,therefore if the fire spreads to window you still have the same amount of water being used either way

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT