MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

CMDA & ESFR Options for Lumber Storage?

2/15/2021

4 Comments

 
We have a 40-foot tall steel construction building, with lumber strapped and stacked, stored in 20-foot high solid piles.

The building is unheated. The building owner has been told by another fire sprinkler contractor that this will require ESFR sprinklers. The owner would prefer a dry pipe system.

We have researched NFPA 13, 2019 edition. It looks as if Chapters 20 and 21 will allow a dry pipe system for this application using CMDA sprinklers.

Anyone else have experience with a scenario like this? What path would you recommend?

​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments
Franck
2/15/2021 10:57:36 am

The issue may come from the height of the building and the clearance between the top of storage and building roof.

When the clearance is too high (excessive clearance), then other adverse effect may occur: delay in the activation of sprinkler heads (resulting on the operation of more sprinklers at the ceiling level), larger heat plume impact at the ceiling level (resulting again on the operation of more sprinklers at the ceiling level), poor penetration effect to the fire area and possible inadequate droplet size distribution when the water distribution pattern reaches the fire area (the fire plume that the sprinkler discharge must penetrate to reach the burning materials increases).
Most performance tests are realized with a clearance between 1.8 and 3 m (6 to 10 feet), and the ideal target is between 0.9 m (3 ft) and 3 m (10 ft).

The maximum allowed clearance for CMDA sprinklers (Control Mode Density/Area) (standard spray sprinklers) to storage should be:
• 6.1 m (20 ft) for palletized, solid-piled, bin box, shelf, or back to back shelf storage of Class I to IV commodities and Group A Plastic.
• 6.1 m (20 ft) for rack storage up to 7.6 m (25 ft) of Class I to IV commodities
• 3.1 m (10 ft) for rack storage of Group A plastic commodities and for rack storage above 7.6 m (25 ft) of Class I to IV commodities.

The storage protection requirements for a given height of storage in a given height of building are also implicitly adequate to protect any lesser storage height in that building. This requirement is necessary as within a warehouse, the storage is never completely full and storage height can fluctuate widely in both the short term and the long term.

When the actual clearance exceeds the limitations indicated above, the situation is at higher risk and complementary measures should be considered to avoid resulting in an inadequately protected storage configuration.

So in your case, 20 ft storage inside a 40 ft building, you may still be in good conditions for an adequate fire protection system.

You can use the CMDA curves for a class III occupancy, with adding 30% to the design area for a dry system.

I would suggest you to use high temperature sprinklers in your case, becuase of the high clearance and the dry pipe system, to avoid opening too many heads before the operation of your system.

You can also use CMSA protection with a dry system (table 22.2 in 2019 Edition)

Be aware about the possible size limitation for the dry pipe system (you need water to be delivered to the most remote point in less than 1 minute!), depending on the size of the building (square footage).

Just one comment: is the roof flat ? Remember that if the roof has a slop exceeding 1:6 (16.7%), then NFPA 13 does not apply for storage occupancies.

Reply
Jesse
2/15/2021 01:21:43 pm

Back in the day, I inspected a lot of forest products workers for insurance. 2016 NFPA 13 Table A 5.6.3.3 notes storage of dimensional lumber as a Class III Commodity. So you can protect it as you would any C-III. Dry ESFR is relatively new to our world, so pay attention to 13s restrictions and allowances.

Also, note that there are some insurers that impose more stringent classifications on the product. I know of 3 major High Protected Risk insurers that designate "stuck" lumber as C-IV Commodity. "Stuck" lumber consists of lumber stacks that have 1" sticks between each stacking tier. This is done downstream of the first bin sorter in the mill, and upstream from the kilns. The purpose is to allow for even drying of the stack by allowing air movement in the kiln across all surfaces of the dimensional lumber boards, as opposed to just the exterior of the solid unit load. This is great for the drying process. But frequently, mills leave the sticks in for quite some time in storage after the kilns. Now we have kiln dried lumber with a moisture content conducive to combustion with the ability to get convective air all around to aid pyrolysis and combustion. Think of stacks of pallets burning as opposed to solid unit load.

ESFR gives you most flexibility if you can do it. But if you go CMDA or CMSA and design for a C-III density and then find out their insurer won't accept it and it needs to be reinforce to a C-IV density, you'll have a really unhappy client.

Hope this helps. J

Reply
Bubaface
2/18/2021 06:11:55 am

Thanks for the input!

Reply
Jesse
2/18/2021 11:32:50 am

You got it!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT