MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Calculate 3,000 sqft with Combustible Ceiling?

3/3/2022

9 Comments

 
I have a project that consists of a concrete deck and a solid decorative wooden ceiling suspended about 1-foot below the deck. I'm trying to determine if this condition would create a combustible concealed space per Section 8.15 of NFPA 13 (2013 edition). The section touches on the construction of structural elements, but not really the construction of the ceiling itself.

Unfortunately, I have not been able to verify the supporting structure of the ceiling as is difficult to access above due to its age and level of ornate detail. I also question the feasibility of being able to protect above this ceiling for those reasons.

If the space is considered a combustible concealed space and the preference is to omit sprinklers from the space, is the course of action at that point to increase the hydraulically remote area to 3,000 sf and omit protection?

​Thanks everyone!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Travis Mack
3/3/2022 08:11:52 am

If sprinklers are required, you must provide them. You don't get the choice to omit or do 3000 sq ft. You follow the sections in the concealed combustible spaces criteria to determine if sprinklers are required or not.

If sprinklers are required, then provide. If sprinklers are not required, then you go to the area about the penalties and see if your omission requires the penalty to be provided.

You can't just arbitrarily omit the sprinklers and do the 3000 sq ft design area.

Reply
Wes
3/3/2022 08:20:50 am

Agreed; well said Travis. I see this "option to choose" concept floated around a lot, and I don't agree with it.

It doesn't appear (at least to me) that the intent was ever to give an "option" on whether to provide sprinklers or not. If it's required to have sprinklers, it needs sprinklers.

Reply
Julius Wanyandeh
3/4/2022 03:10:45 am

Due to the fact that the area is combustion sensitive it is only fair to install sprinklers there is no option to that.

Dan Wilder
3/3/2022 08:26:41 am

The space as you describe it does not fall under any of the scenarios within 13-13' 8.15 or the allowances within 11.2.3.1.4 (3) & (4). When ceilings are referenced, they typically are defined as non-combustible or limited combustible ceilings.

You may be able to argue filling the space with noncombustible insulation and keeping the space under the FT² or FT³ limitations as imposed in other sections but as I don't deal with this as much, interested to see others approaches.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
3/3/2022 08:34:10 am

We run into this situation fairly frequently and I've yet to run into a situation where the 3000 sqft is required. It seems very unlikely. As Travis said you usually sprinkler or you don't. However, we do have a very pro fire sprinkler fire marshal that has several old row house situations in his jurisdiction and he is pushing to have the owners electively sprinkler one by one. In many cases he allows the above ceiling areas to not be sprinklered (where the ceilings are historical/original). Damage to the building would be substantial and cost to sprinkler these areas would be prohibitive. I am definitely in favor of leaving sprinklers out if it means these buildings get retrofitted with a sprinkler system electively. When/if the times comes to renovate and remove old ceilings, the sprinkler system is there and this can be corrected at that time.

Reply
Jonathan Sullivan
3/3/2022 08:37:16 am

A practical note for this type of installation, please make sure our GC and architect have done their due diligence with your state historic preservation office (SHPO). We've run into these sort of old tongue and groove ceilings before; they are difficult to deconstruct and reconstruct, but often need to be preserved.

Reply
Glenn Berger
3/3/2022 09:28:03 am

The 1 foot between the concrete and the wood ceiling will make it difficult to get sprinklers installed in this space. I do not see in the question, about historical nature of the facility.

I would definitely have sprinklers install below the wood ceiling and have the space between the wood ceiling and the concrete deck minimize as much as possible, just enough space to run non-combustible materials above.

Reply
Jesse
3/3/2022 09:32:50 am

I'd like to know the occupancy and design criteria. I assume its a commercial building using full 13, or we wouldn't be discussing.

It may need to be protected. But the thing is, fire doesn't spread very well laterally over flat surface. Convection is the most efficient method of heat transfer and creates positive heat feedback. In the event of a fire, the convection column will mushroom at the concrete deck. You'll have some fall-down ignition" but it won't release nearly as much energy release as you'd expect. The positive heat feedback will be severely limited.

I had a project where we had something like this, albeit a small area. I was able to omit protection using this position, and the fact that in my case, I had no means of ignition. It helped that I taught that particular fire marshal in a fire cause and origin class years before, but the premise remains.

I would advise involving your AHJ and getting their opinion.

Reply
Dave
3/3/2022 12:52:26 pm

As others have correctly stated, the 3000 sf modifer come sinto play for adjacent spaces if you utilized one of the exceptions from sprinklering offered in the "Concealed Spaces Not Requiring Sprinkler Protection" section of the Installation Requirements chapter, UNLESS the condition fits one of the exceptions to the 3000 requirement listed in the Design Approaches chapter, as part of the paragraphs on the 3000 requirement. The condition has to cleanly fall within the descrition of an exeption, as well and the description of where 3000 is exempt if you want to use that. One cannot use it the other way around and calc 3000 in order to get around sprinklering a concealed space.
Wood ceilings, whether solid or slatted, or slatted with the insulation blanket on top, or the new to the scene CLT panels, are a huge challenge, and flame-spread rating alone does not get you to not sprinklering. On some projects I have been able to get the architect to go with a wood-look cement-board, but usually only at exterior overhangs.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT