I have a project that consists of a concrete deck and a solid decorative wooden ceiling suspended about 1-foot below the deck. I'm trying to determine if this condition would create a combustible concealed space per Section 8.15 of NFPA 13 (2013 edition). The section touches on the construction of structural elements, but not really the construction of the ceiling itself.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to verify the supporting structure of the ceiling as is difficult to access above due to its age and level of ornate detail. I also question the feasibility of being able to protect above this ceiling for those reasons. If the space is considered a combustible concealed space and the preference is to omit sprinklers from the space, is the course of action at that point to increase the hydraulically remote area to 3,000 sf and omit protection? Thanks everyone! Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Travis Mack
3/3/2022 08:11:52 am
If sprinklers are required, you must provide them. You don't get the choice to omit or do 3000 sq ft. You follow the sections in the concealed combustible spaces criteria to determine if sprinklers are required or not.
Reply
Wes
3/3/2022 08:20:50 am
Agreed; well said Travis. I see this "option to choose" concept floated around a lot, and I don't agree with it.
Reply
Julius Wanyandeh
3/4/2022 03:10:45 am
Due to the fact that the area is combustion sensitive it is only fair to install sprinklers there is no option to that.
Dan Wilder
3/3/2022 08:26:41 am
The space as you describe it does not fall under any of the scenarios within 13-13' 8.15 or the allowances within 11.2.3.1.4 (3) & (4). When ceilings are referenced, they typically are defined as non-combustible or limited combustible ceilings.
Reply
Casey Milhorn
3/3/2022 08:34:10 am
We run into this situation fairly frequently and I've yet to run into a situation where the 3000 sqft is required. It seems very unlikely. As Travis said you usually sprinkler or you don't. However, we do have a very pro fire sprinkler fire marshal that has several old row house situations in his jurisdiction and he is pushing to have the owners electively sprinkler one by one. In many cases he allows the above ceiling areas to not be sprinklered (where the ceilings are historical/original). Damage to the building would be substantial and cost to sprinkler these areas would be prohibitive. I am definitely in favor of leaving sprinklers out if it means these buildings get retrofitted with a sprinkler system electively. When/if the times comes to renovate and remove old ceilings, the sprinkler system is there and this can be corrected at that time.
Reply
Jonathan Sullivan
3/3/2022 08:37:16 am
A practical note for this type of installation, please make sure our GC and architect have done their due diligence with your state historic preservation office (SHPO). We've run into these sort of old tongue and groove ceilings before; they are difficult to deconstruct and reconstruct, but often need to be preserved.
Reply
Glenn Berger
3/3/2022 09:28:03 am
The 1 foot between the concrete and the wood ceiling will make it difficult to get sprinklers installed in this space. I do not see in the question, about historical nature of the facility.
Reply
Jesse
3/3/2022 09:32:50 am
I'd like to know the occupancy and design criteria. I assume its a commercial building using full 13, or we wouldn't be discussing.
Reply
Dave
3/3/2022 12:52:26 pm
As others have correctly stated, the 3000 sf modifer come sinto play for adjacent spaces if you utilized one of the exceptions from sprinklering offered in the "Concealed Spaces Not Requiring Sprinkler Protection" section of the Installation Requirements chapter, UNLESS the condition fits one of the exceptions to the 3000 requirement listed in the Design Approaches chapter, as part of the paragraphs on the 3000 requirement. The condition has to cleanly fall within the descrition of an exeption, as well and the description of where 3000 is exempt if you want to use that. One cannot use it the other way around and calc 3000 in order to get around sprinklering a concealed space.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Feb '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
March 2025
PE PREP SERIES |