MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Are Standoff Hangers Allowed for Steel Pipe?

4/11/2022

11 Comments

 
Galvanized standoff hangers are used all the time for CPVC - are they allowed to be used with steel pipe also?

Product data that I'm looking at doesn't say that they cannot be used for steel, but they say "rated for use with CPVC". If they're capable with a weaker product (CPVC), then wouldn't that be more conservative than steel?

I haven't come across this before, but we have a unique structure situation where we'll be routing pipe slightly above a structural frame in a lab-type setting, and the standoffs would provide a clean/strong way to support the pipe. Thanks in advance!

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Dan Wilder
4/11/2022 08:34:58 am

The Tolco Fig 28M (Eaton B3184) is listed for steel pipe up to 2", but the description should state the type of pipe the hanger can support. I wouldn't follow the path of it didn't say I couldn't do it when it comes to data sheets.

Not much else is available in the stand off hangers (Argo, PHD, Caddy is what I looked through).

Can you get away with a unistrut & pipe strap assembly or a U-Bolt?

Reply
Pat Drumm
4/11/2022 08:36:53 am

Before thinking of using them, I would advise you to confirm with the hanger manufacturer that they are listed for steel piping. Without explicit approval on the data sheet for steel piping, I think you're putting yourself in a tough spot. With the steel piping being heavier than CPVC, I don't think you can assume the CPVC listing is comparable with the steel piping.

We encounter a bit of medical lab building designs here in the Northeast near Boston. Although I'm not sure what the specifics are for your design, we have seen hangers include Sammy Screws w/ short rod studs, & pipe clamps or F&M rings with the attachment drilled down into the "lab room" structure. Typically when encountered with unique situations, we reach out to manufacturers to confirm we are utilizing the components in an approved manner.

Good luck on your project.

Reply
Glenn Berger
4/11/2022 08:57:58 am

First - Googled "standoff hangers" - Never had heard that term before.

Everything that I have read so far is that they are approved for CPVC piping only. As such I cannot recommend them for being used with steel piping.

Reply
Alex
4/11/2022 09:05:11 am

Hi,

I echo above - if the sheet does not specifically list the hangers for steel, then I would not use them.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply
Casey Milhorn
4/11/2022 09:23:01 am

We have used two hole straps for steel pipe, when the weight of the pipe is supported by the member itself. (Steel pipe laying on top of the bottom chord of a wood truss). I'm sure some of our guys have slipped some steel pipe into some standoff hangers as well. Guys in the field get pretty creative at times.... lol, but definitely not designed on purpose that way. I agree with everyone else, but I would add that if the project is large enough and has a structural engineer that is a team player, run it past them, even if you have to throw a few dollars their way (if it makes sense). I would only consider this if it were going to save a lot of $, be completely signed off on by a Structural PE, have approval of AHJ/GC/Design Team, and I just felt like it was the right thing to do in this scenario. There are lots of little things that we use to hang/support sometimes that aren't listed specifically for fire sprinkler piping, but these are more like nuts, bolts, angle iron, etc.... Short answer, probably not worth the risk.

Reply
brian walder link
4/11/2022 09:48:20 am

The Anvil Fig.188R (Formally Afcon Fig.514) is listed for CPVC, Steel, and Copper pipe ¾" - 2"

Reply
brian walder
4/11/2022 09:58:18 am

*Formerly 😂

Reply
Ryan Hinson
4/11/2022 11:00:50 am

I agree with both Dan and Pat. A quick look at an older Tolco 28M cutsheet for these indicates the listing for CPVC piping with maximum hanger spacing less than half what is allowed for steel pipe. The B3184 standoff hanger indicated for steel piping is not UL-listed.

Standoff hangers using a split ring or split pipe clamp such as a B3198 are also not allowed for supporting the weight of waterfilled piping since both the screw closure and pivot pin are less than the minimum 3/8" as allowed in NFPA 13. These can only be used to restrain a vertical pipe from pulling away from a wall where the base of the drop is already supported by acceptable means.

Reply
Matthew Foreman
4/11/2022 01:53:41 pm

A word of caution using a galvanized steel product in contact with non-galvanized steel pipe. This dissimilar metal situation causes increased corrosion on the steel pipe. They make all copper stand off material for use with copper pipe for this same reason. The most corroding metal in the fixture becomes sacrificial.

I would expect this corrosion could be cause for failures halfway through a 50 year system/building life.

Reply
Jay
4/12/2022 03:51:14 pm

You need to reference the data sheet for maximum load the hanger listed to carry, calculate the weight of your water-filled pipe, and then refer to NFPA 13 which requires the hanger assembly to support 5 times the weight of the water-filled pipe plus 250lb. The weight listing is typically for the maximum allowable hanger spacing. In unique situations you can use more hangers (4ft spacing rather than 15ft), therfore less load per hanger, so that each hanger is supporting less weight than ots listed for. Just make sure the structure you're hanging from is able to support additional weight of water-filled pipe also.

Reply
Brad
4/13/2022 10:24:19 am

^^^ I like Jay's reply. Also, Pat Drumm was spot on -- the manufacturer is ultimately where the question ought to be directed. At least, that is, if you want an answer that means anything. After getting that answer you'll find out during the submittal if the AHJ is cool with it.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT