MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Approved Pipe Material for Pier/Dock Standpipe?

6/6/2023

12 Comments

 
Has anyone designed a dry manual standpipe for a pier or dock standpipe system in the past?

My question is in regards to materials used for the pipe.

With the tides rising and falling my client is struggling to find an approved material that will allow for enough flexibility.

I walked an adjacent marina to our project and it looked like they used 4" heavy-duty rubber tubing to run out the standpipe lines and transitioned to steel only for the vertical 2 1/2" up to the hose valves on the dock.

Any information to point us in the right direction would be helpful. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
David Kendrick
6/6/2023 08:12:20 am

Metraflex

https://www.metrafire.com/products-category/flexible-connector/

Reply
SCHULMAN
6/6/2023 08:19:20 am

NFPA 14: 4.2.6 says you can use any pipe as long as it is installed within the limits of its listing and per the manufacturer's instructions. So if it meets the pressure requirements and is installed correctly and passes tests you should be good. The rubber tubing sounds like a good idea for the use. Talk to your AHJ / Fire Marshall ... Best of luck

Reply
Dan Wilder
6/6/2023 08:25:19 am

While I have not designed one, what I've seen in the past:

Use of HDPE piping beneath with taps of stainless or galvanized (assuming, they were heavily painted) for the individual hose valves.

Straight carbon/stainless steel (again, heavily painted) and metraflex seismic assemblies.

Some older installations had what looked like a rubber bellows type assembly (likely not a fire protection listed assembly but just a solution implemented).

Something like a FlexHead Flexible Pipe, Metraflex FireStraight or even a "U" or "V" loop assembly come to mind as acceptable options for the movement.

Reply
Pete H
6/6/2023 08:53:37 am

Seeing the metraflex mentions here, I'll just mention that Reliable just dropped their equivalent "Rascoloop"

Reply
Joe F
6/6/2023 10:00:05 am

We have designed and installed a few in the past. We typically used SCH-80 PVC, and installed the piping between the dock joist below the deck boards to protect from physical damage, and sun damage over time.
Our transition to the gangway or ramp we used a heavy black hose found here:
https://www.continental-industry.com/en/solutions/fluid-handling/industrial-hoses/chemical-transfer-petroleum-hoses/products/petroleum-transfer-suction-discharge/plicord-super-black-flexwing.
Our manufacture would add Grooved Ends on the hose for connection to the dock piping. The hose valves were piped with Galvanized Sch-40, and connected to the supply pipe with Slip x Thread adapters.
Another major problem is the hangers or supports. Most are steel and will rust away quickly. We had better luck with Stainless Steel Banning Straps.

I would suggest looking into the HDPE as mentioned above. We did not have the tools required to join the large HDPE pipe and fitting.

Reply
Pete D.
6/6/2023 10:33:59 am

I would analyze the buoyant force acting on the pipe. I like the idea of using metraflex, but those are expensive.

Look at the highest volume of submerged pipe x the density of sea water, minus the pipe weight. You are looking at even load distribution along the path of the pipe, which should not create any deflection at the joints, unless part of the run is angled up or down and partially submerged.

I'd think you could resist the buoyant force using surge clips with your hanger rings or alternately using 138R split rings.

I would also consider the corrosion resistance of the material selected. You might consider cathodic protection for this.

Reply
Ryan Hinson
6/6/2023 12:30:53 pm

Be careful about use of HDPE (or any plastic pipe) in aboveground installation for FP as it is not listed for such use. Nor is any plastic listed in NFPA 14 (2016) Table 4.2.1 or for above ground installation per NFPA 24.

Since this pipe is normally-empty, there is no heat-sink to temper/delay pipe expansion due to ambient temperature changes.

Also, changes in ambient temperatures will result in expansion/contraction of the HDPE and proper support of such piping in accordance with mfgrs'/HDPE industry direction to allow expansion/contraction without creating trapped pockets is paramount. What are the conditions when it is installed versus the full ambient temperature range? How will it be completely drained? How will this piping be protected from direct sunlight? The surface temperature of HDPE piping in direct sun may be 50°F higher than the ambient temperature condition and the resulting effective pressure rating of of the piping is heavily dependent upon the maximum localized temperature to which the pipe may be exposed.

Without significant- and expensive plastic pipe protection considerations...and AHJ approval, I would recommend against using plastics in this scenario.

Metallic components with appropriate corrosion-reducing/mitigation measures would be the route I'd go...keeping in mind the galvanic corrosion potential recommended limit is 0.15 V in this harsh environment wherever dissimilar metals interact.

Reply
Colin Lusher
6/6/2023 01:13:21 pm

I've designed these for fixed piers in Hawaii, and we've used all stainless steel pipe and fittings. I'm not sure about the flexibility issue with your moving dock, but we used a metraflex at the point of connection from the pier to the land.

Reply
Scott Chambers/Champion fire design
6/9/2023 10:12:12 pm

I have run a few horizontal standpipes above and below a pier. Above we used galvanized and stainless steel with grooved ends. Below the pier was a bit more challenging both for corrosion resistance and durability from rising waters and the waves constantly crashing against it. Cement lined ductile iron pipe with flanged ends was found to be most durable. Of course securing it to the pier also plays a huge role in its longevity. They now make quite a bit of plastic and epoxy coated hanging materials which wouldn't be a bad idea to use. Good luck.

Reply
Shane Gilbertson
6/12/2023 12:49:37 pm

Following for ideas.
Here in Florida every beach jurisdiction requires something different, but nothing lasts long. of course cost is always an issue so stainless steel gets thrown out first. We do provide the Tar solution at all connections with Galv SCH40 pipe & fittings. HDPE and SCH80 PVC does not fair well with the Florida sun so I try give an option to wrap the pipe, at an extra cost of course. One main issue is if the dock can provide stability and durability of hanging ductile iron pipe while waves are bashing everything. I like the idea of using FlexHead or Metraflex, but also expensive.

Reply
Patrick Drumm
11/24/2023 03:10:18 pm

Although I meant to do this months ago, thank you to all you contributed to this discussion. It was very helpful in helping us come to a solution regarding materials on this project.

Reply
Thomas Surherland
1/20/2026 11:52:45 am

Could you share what avenue you came up with?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT