MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Appropriate Sprinkler Height from Tall Roof?

6/15/2023

9 Comments

 
We have a production facility with a roof height of 55-ft. Someone has decided that storage sprinklers would be more appropriate.

How far from the roof would it be acceptable to install K11.2 (K160) spray sprinklers?

Is this approach even acceptable? Does the extreme height of the roof affect the best sprinkler height?

I vaguely remember Russ Fleming did a paper on the hottest point in the fire plume being some 10 % (?) of the ceiling height from the roof. Must have been 20 years ago or more.

Hopefully someone can help me with information or views on this subject on an appropriate height from the roof.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
JI
6/15/2023 08:08:16 am

NFPA is rather silent on this issue unless storage is mentioned. FM guidelines has different requirements for ceiling heights as they get higher within DS 3-26.

Reply
R Jackson link
6/15/2023 08:21:33 am

FM has their own guidelines on everything. It seems as if they are close to something I read a long, long time ago. 'They seem to be able to swallow a camel, but gag on a gnat.' Pretty much sums up all politicians as well. Just my 2 cents worth. (That and $5.00 will get you a cup of 25 cent coffee.)

Reply
moises OLMEDA
6/15/2023 08:25:11 am

I think your guess is reasonable, even though the hazard category is between OH & EH, a bigger droplets have a better chance to control de fire and avoid the heat and turn into steam.

Reply
Jesse
6/15/2023 08:38:12 am

Seems like you have a few questions. First, make sure that whatever sprinkler you use is listed for the hazard class. Most storage sprinklers carry listings for OH.

Second, the storage sprinklers don't necessarily provide a larger drop per se. Large drop sprinklers do. Standard spray sprinklers are just that regardless of the listing.

Third, except when avoiding beams upright sprinkles will need to be within 12-inches of the deck usually/

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
6/15/2023 08:38:15 am

2022 NFPA 13 includes the following references to “distance below ceilings” :

Chapter 9 — Sprinkler Location Requirements
9.5.4.1* Distance Below Ceilings.

Chapter 10 — Installation Requirements for Standard Pendent, Upright, and Sidewall Spray Sprinklers
10.2.6.1 Distance Below Ceilings.
10.3.5.1 Distance Below Ceilings and from Walls.

Chapter 11 — Installation Requirements for Extended Coverage Upright, Pendent, Sidewall Spray Sprinkler
11.2.4.1 Distance Below Ceilings.
11.3.5.1 Distance Below Ceilings and from Walls to Which Sprinklers Are Mounted.

Chapter 13 — Installation Requirements for CMSA Sprinklers
13.2.7.1* Distance Below Ceilings.

Chapter 14 — Installation Requirements for Early Suppression Fast-Response Sprinklers
14.2.10.1 Distance Below Ceilings.

2022 NFPA Chapter 26 Special Designs of Storage Protection “is new to the 2022 edition of NFPA 13, but the requirements are not new to the standard. The protection criteria for the unique hazards covered in this chapter have been developed through many different tests for different materials and storage arrangements with various sprinkler types. Instead of having those scattered throughout NFPA 13 in several different chapters, they have been gathered together to be provided in a single chapter to make the criteria easier to find.”

Chapter 26 goes on to state the following :

26.1* General.
26.1.1*
This chapter shall cover special sprinkler system designs for storage protection.
26.1.2
The requirements of Chapter 20 shall apply unless modified by this chapter.
ENHANCED CONTENT
Where Chapter 26 has criteria for protection of a specific commodity, arrangement, and sprinkler, this chapter can be utilized. For anything not directly addressed within this chapter, the general requirements for storage protection of Chapter 20 apply.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
6/15/2023 08:38:47 am

2022 NFPA 13 Chapter 20 General Requirements for Storage states the following :

Using Chapter 20 to Determine Storage Protection
For the protection of any storage occupancy, the intent of NFPA 13 is for the user to start with Chapter 20 and determine the general rules that apply. Then, the user is to go to the appropriate chapter (Chapter 21 to Chapter 26) for the commodity and storage arrangement being protected to get the rest of the discharge criteria.

In general, the protection rules in Chapter 20 through Chapter 26 are designed to answer four basic questions, assuming that a fire is going to start in the occupancy:

1. What is a reasonable estimate of the flow that will be needed for the sprinkler system? (This includes consideration for the number of sprinklers that might open in a fire and the flow that will be used for fire department operations to extinguish the fire upon their arrival.)
2. At what pressure does that flow need to be available?
3. How long will the flow need to last?
4. If the storage is on racks, do sprinklers need to be placed in the racks, or can the storage be protected by sprinklers only at the ceiling?

When NFPA 13 is selected as the document to provide requirements for protecting occupancies from fire with sprinklers, it is important to follow all the requirements of NFPA 13. The user is discouraged from picking selected requirements from other documents and trying to use them with NFPA 13, because the fundamental assumptions that went into selected requirements from other documents might not be valid with NFPA 13. Users who want to select sprinkler design criteria from another standard are encouraged to use that standard in its entirety, including any additional standards referenced by that standard. The authority having jurisdiction is permitted to review the other set of standards and determine whether or not (as a package) it meets the same level of safety as that prescribed by NFPA 13. If the authority having jurisdiction is convinced that the other set of standards is sufficient, then that set of standards can be permitted to be used under Section 1.4 and Section 1.5 of NFPA 13 as an alternative that meets the same level of safety as NFPA 13.

While the storage chapters of NFPA 13 can seem daunting at first, they become easier to navigate once the pertinent information for a given facility is identified. For most storage facilities, only a few dozen individual sections of the standard are applicable. The trick is being able to identify which sections apply to a given storage arrangement and which ones can be ignored. That is done by finding the correct sections in each chapter to jump to after the requirements of Chapter 20 have been addressed and the pertinent information has been identified. This information should be identified by the designer prior to searching through the various storage chapters (Chapter 21 through 26) since that information will confine the search to only the pertinent chapters and sections. After the commodity classification and the storage arrangement have been identified, the next step is to determine the ceiling-only options, if any, that apply from Chapters 21, 22, 23, 24, or 26, followed by the ceiling and in-rack options that are available from Chapter 25.

Exhibit 20.1 is a checklist that should be used prior to navigating through the individual storage chapters of NFPA 13. Once the information has been identified on the form, finding an applicable design approach becomes much simpler. Many designers simply take the commodity class and storage type (rack, piled, etc.) and head into the storage design chapters looking for guidance. While that is certainly one approach, it is like starting to cook dinner without first checking to see what ingredients you need—you might have to replan or reassess once you realize that you do not have the ingredients you need to finish the meal. Failing to identify critical information such as storage height, clearance, storage arrangement, and ceiling height can lead to headaches later in the design process if they are not factored into the design decision up front. All the information in Exhibit 20.1 is needed to achieve an allowable design option, so it is helpful to start with this form.

20.1 General.
This chapter shall provide the necessary steps for identifying commodity, storage arrangements, storage heights, and clearances as well as general protection criteria for storage conditions relative to Chapters 21 through 25.
ENHANCED CONTENT
FAQ
Why was Chapter 20 written to apply to all storage arrangements?
Rather than repeat all the general rules that apply to all storage situations, the rules have been consolidated in one location so that they are easily found and uniformly enforced. If the rules were repeated in multiple chapters, they might be more difficult to find, and they unintentionally might be modified by the technical committee in one chapter while left alone or modified in a differe

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
6/15/2023 08:39:53 am

FAQ
Why was Chapter 20 written to apply to all storage arrangements?
Rather than repeat all the general rules that apply to all storage situations, the rules have been consolidated in one location so that they are easily found and uniformly enforced. If the rules were repeated in multiple chapters, they might be more difficult to find, and they unintentionally might be modified by the technical committee in one chapter while left alone or modified in a different way in another chapter.
FAQ
Why are systems designed in accordance with 4.3.1.4 through 4.3.1.6 and 25.2 exempt from the requirements of Chapter 20?
Sprinkler systems that protect miscellaneous storage or low-piled storage have more in common with ordinary hazard or extra hazard occupancies than they do with storage occupancies. Fires in those occupancies do not generate the same kind of forceful vertical fire plumes that can be found in other storage occupancies. Therefore, the discharge criteria for systems designed in accordance with 4.3.1.4 through 4.3.1.6 and 25.2 ultimately revert to criteria in 4.3.3 through 4.3.6 for ordinary or extra hazard systems; the more stringent criteria found in Chapter 20 do not apply.
The rules of Chapter 20 apply to all storage occupancies, except for miscellaneous storage (4.3.1.4), low-piled storage (4.3.1.5), miscellaneous tire storage (4.3.1.6), and the storage arrangements in 25.2. When planning a sprinkler system for a storage or warehouse occupancy, the user needs to make sure that all the rules of Chapter 20 are followed in addition to the applicable requirements of Chapter 21 through Chapter 26. Even though Chapter 26 is not listed in Section 20.1, 26.1.2 states that Chapter 20 requirements must be followed.

Dan Wilder
6/15/2023 08:42:35 am

If the question is to lower sprinklers below the standard NFPA written or Sprinkler listed deflector distances below the roof deck, no, there is no provision within NFPA for that.

This is where a FPE consultation would be very beneficial to establish both effectiveness of the sprinkler system at that height and type of sprinkler to best provide water to the ground with heat and smoke modeling.

FM Guidelines can also be useful with the buy-in from the approving entities for design approach if structured correctly.

I did a design for a large convention center with 105' ceilings where we provided closed head 11.2K sprinkler layout at the roof deck (with something like a +5000ft² remote area) and a supplemental system of open head deluge EC sidewalls that covered the floor area around the 50' elevation (with beam detection). All FPE detailed AHJ/Insurance approved, but the intent was to provide the lower sprinkler coverage for water onto the fire and the overhead as a secondary cooling at the higher roof if needed.

Reply
Pete H
6/15/2023 02:54:18 pm

55 foot building using storage heads?

Is it protecting storage? It sounds like it is. In which case, you're going to have to use FM (as other comments have pointed out).

That said, if you are protecting storage as per FM 8-9... no, you won't be able to use an 11.2k sprinkler for a 55 foot building with storage underneath. You'll more likely be using either 28.0K or 33.6K sprinklers.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Oct '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT