MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Any Way to Control What Contacts CPVC Pipe?

4/12/2022

13 Comments

 
CPVC has compatibility issues with various sealants.

As an architect, I can specify, review submittals, and keep an eye open during site visits, but there's a lot to keep track of. That goes for our engineers, who frequently cross-specify products. Throwing "compatibility" language in the spec is ultimately lazy, lame, and functionally unenforceable.

Does the sprinkler industry have a way to control what comes in contact with CPVC?

Is there a better way to prevent other products from being in contact with the pipe (ie: actual adherence)?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments
Pete H
4/12/2022 06:45:28 am

You could request a specific brand in the specs (i.e. blazemaster) and then additionally add "Viking blazemaster solvent cement only" . And then make sure that the contract is awarded as plans and specs and not design build or code coverage equivalent.

But that's really it. We can't control other trades and the site in general, so short of making the sprinkler contractor adhere to the brand you specifically want, I can't think of a way to protect the pipe from coming into contact with anything and everything unforeseen.

Reply
Alex
4/12/2022 07:09:44 am

Hi,

I would agree with Pete. In the end, if the system fails its on the contractor but lets be honest, the building owner will blame everyone involved. For that reason, I would specify a system you know works and you've used in the past, and stick to your guns.

Alex

Reply
M.Newell
4/12/2022 08:06:55 am

If you are able to specify and enforce. You could state in your specifications that the pipe needs to be insulated that way the coax or ethernet cable wouldn’t directly impact the CPVC system which is common for failures. This could be the responsibility of the general contractor or the installing fire protection contractor but would be a good safeguard for keeping things off of the sprinkler piping.

Reply
Glenn Berger
4/12/2022 08:08:39 am

This is where a good field quality control staff earns their keep.

Reply
Chris Logan link
4/12/2022 08:24:42 am

Nothing that will hold up in court! Post notice with the GC regarding compatibility issues, and notify the general contractor or consultant of any compatibility issues on site that occur

Reply
Darren
4/12/2022 08:34:27 am

I have found the best course is multiple paths. Use the coordination meetings as a forum to remind ALL trades of the importance of being aware of ALL CPVC piping products on the project (its often not just fire sprinkler piping). Specify a single fire caulk that is a known compatible product, for all trades. And finally, use the site walks through out the project to identify possible issues.

Reply
Dan Wilder
4/12/2022 08:46:54 am

Unfortunately no. If you are spec'ing the use of CPVC, the language for both Blazemaster and Spears are easily pulled from the website for handling & installation. Both of their tech support dept are very helpful as well, reach out to them.

In my experience, CPVC is more about liability mitigation than actual installer issues. We send a notice to the GC, post notices around the jobsite for other trades, give notice to the pipe fab company about their steel pipe (when used) will be in contact with CPVC and receive a reply that they did not use anything incompatible (at the time of fabrication). We also print off the compatibility list at the time of the project to have record of what was/wasn't allowed (this also gets sent to the GC for record)

It is pretty simple to see when a telecom tech uses our CPVC pipe to pull his CAT5 cables across, when the spray foam application comes in contact with the pipe, or when the painter oversprays things. We document with lots of install pictures and note dates & conditions and if we find issues, provide a quote for replacement. It's not always accepted but its documented for later.

Reply
Jesse
4/12/2022 09:13:30 am

I'm pretty hyper-sensitive to this. We had a very large hotel project where we had to rip out a lot of CPVC due the GC not going with my direction. In TX, state law gives someone with my license overall responsibility for automatic sprinkler. I typically have my designers specify on AS drawings where we're using CPVC to indicate that only compatible materials be used in applications where it contacts CPVC, etc. In the last case, it was wall texture compound that contained an elastomer that was incompatible. Of course the GC wanted to clean it as opposed to replace pipe, but I wouldn't sign off on it.

I agree with what everyone has said on this. I don't know if there is an easy answer. But the bottom line is, we need the AS system to operate correctly when we need it.

Reply
Pete D.
4/12/2022 09:35:17 am

It's worth mentioning, most CPVC systems in commercial applications transition from steel systems. Example is a hotel with steel class 1 standpipe combines systems that transition to Cpvc downstream of the floor control assembly. In this application, and it is often overlooked, the steel components upstream of the cpvc must be fabricated using cpvc-compatible cutting oil. The job goes to bid showing standpipe and overhead systems, without specifying how to accomplish that. It's a reasonable inference that the winning bidder will install combined systems, and cpvc-compatible fabrication should be included in the steel pipe specs.

Reply
Dave
4/12/2022 11:12:43 am

Unfortunately the responsibility is placed upon the manufacturer of components to submit them for CPVC compatibility testing, and the CPVC manufacturer will not back-up results from another CPVC manufacturer. Some incompatibility issues are universal, oils, oil-based paint, cable insulation, insecticides, some cutting oils. I have found others tough, like some insulation, Visqueen etc.

Here's Blazemaster's December 2021 hour-long webinar on compatibility. Despite being weighted with a Blazemaster bias, it is very excellent information.
https://youtu.be/VUvQegqPDtM

https://www.blazemaster.com/en-us/fbc-system-compatible-program

Reply
Scott McBride
4/13/2022 11:07:32 am

Well this starts with the designers as mentioned above. Then the reviewer, who has the responsibility to make sure that any materials that come in contact with the CPVC pipe is compatible by getting the data sheets for those products and checking the manufacturers compatibility list. Then it is the responsibility of the installing contractor to make sure that they are installing the approved items and not substituting without prior approval. Then it is the responsibility of the inspector to verify during the inspection that the products used match what was approved in the review. But ultimately it is the GCs responsibility to ensure that his contractors are using the materials that have been approved prior to the closing of the walls.

Reply
Lainey link
4/20/2022 10:27:14 am

This is an excellent question. I think the key is education on and awareness of CPVC and compatibility for ALL trades on the jobsite as well as the building owner.

In terms of training, all CPVC manufacturers offer in-person trainings. BlazeMaster additionally offers online and virtual trainings, which can be found here: https://www.blazemaster.com/en-us/training.

Additionally, CPVC manufacturers offer Jobsite Notices that can/should be printed and posted around high-traffic areas of a job site to help spread awareness. There's also turn over letters that inform the owner about properly caring for a CPVC system. These docs can be downloaded on BlazeMaster, JCI, Viking, Spears, and Reliable websites.

CPVC manufacturers also have their own "programs" that define what ancillary products are compatible and incompatible with their brand of CPVC. Lubrizol BlazeMaster's is found at www.fbcsystemcompatible.com. Spears has some guidance at www.spearsmfg.com. We at Lubrizol recommend that trades choose to use the products that are part of our Compatibility program as there will be absolutely no question as to whether they are compatible with BlazeMaster.

As someone mentioned above, specifying a specific brand brand of CPVC for the entire system and specifying specific ancillary products that are compatible with that brand (i.e. are part of its compatibility program) and not allowing substitutions is a pretty good way to nip compatibility issues in the bud.

The BlazeMaster team would be more than willing to discuss this topic with you in detail and/or provide support and training. If you'd like to reach out, you can send an e-mail to [email protected] and mention my name to connect with me.

Reply
Dereck K. link
8/6/2024 03:47:19 pm

Very late reply, but figured this can be useful for anybody else stumbling upon this post in the future.

To keep CPVC pipes safe from compatibility issues, start by clearly specifying the approved materials in your project documents. This means listing exactly which sealants and other products can be used with CPVC and making sure these choices follow the manufacturer's guidelines. Design the system with physical barriers or separation methods to keep incompatible substances away from the pipes.

During installation, make sure the team is trained and that there are regular checks to ensure only approved products are used. All materials should be properly labeled and documented. Good communication among architects, engineers, and contractors is key to making sure everyone follows the compatibility rules. Regularly updating your practices based on industry standards will help keep everything in line.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT