MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Always In-Rack for Solid Loads in Open Rack?

5/27/2021

5 Comments

 
​We have a project where the tenant intends to store Class I to Class III commodities that have a typical footprint of 12’ x 3.5’ (42 SF) on open-wire mesh racking.

Between the Definition 3.3.172 (NFPA 13-2019) Rack Shelf Area which specifically calls out “by the placement of loads” and the definition “Open Rack” (3.3.140) it appears that this condition has to be viewed an Solid Rack and would require In-Rack sprinklers no matter what roof level system (CMDA, ESFR, K-25) is installed or the Commodity Class stored.

I know there are some special designs related to “big box retail” stores (Mercantile) for this, but our application is Warehouse (Storage). There are also additional conditions if the footprint is greater than 64 SF.

Is there a way to read the above definitions that would not require in-rack sprinklers when Loads with a footprint over 20 SF and less than 64 SF are placed on otherwise Open Rack?

Requiring in-rack sprinklers is a potentially major expense for an owner with 75+ operable facilities like this.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
Franck
5/27/2021 09:32:55 am

I am afraid you're right and it may cost a lot for your owner with his 75+ locations...

To be considered as open rack arrangement, you need longitudinal and transversal flue spaces (the 6 in. nominal flues on all 4 sides around your maximum pallet footprint of 20 sq ft).
The transversal flue space is even more important than the longitudinal flue space (the longitudinal flue is a "must" requirement for storage above 25 ft, and a good advice below).
The purpose is to have the fire spreading vertically to activate the ceiling sprinklers without spreading horizonrtally too far...
This is the vertical spread of the fire toward the ceiling that will activate the sprinklers. The sooner, the better, and on a smaller area, the better.
With large pallet footprints, this means that the vertical fire spread will occur at longer intervals, will activate more heads at the ceiling, and will spread horizontally within the rack as the water will be prevented to reach the fire by the large pallet loads above...
This is why, when you are considering "solid shelves" in racks (as in your case), you need intermediate in-rack sprinklers to be as close as possible to the fire and prevent the opening of too many heads at the ceiling level.

If you consider the vertical fire spread through the transversal flue space between pallet loads, you will better understand the design requirement for ESFR and CMSA.
If the fire is directly below one sprinkler (ESFR), you will open one head. And then the fire/heat plume will spread in all directions and you "may" activate the second row around that sprinkler. This means 8 additional ESFR, for a total of 9 (if you make a drawing, it is easier to understand... I can't do it in this text box).
But if the fire starts between 2 sprinklers, you will first activate 2 ESFR at the ceiling, and then the second row will involve 10 more ESFR, for a total of 12.
As ESFR are very efficient (and most tests demonstarates fire extinguishments with 1-3 heads), the final design is generally with 12 ESFR (sometimes more, but for higher storage height/more hazardous commodities).
With CMSA, this is the same principle. But as we are on the control mode, a 25% safery margin is added (12 + 25% = 15). You end up with a general design with 15 CMSA sprinklers :)

But if you have solid shelves, the design will not work anymore as you are not considering 2 heads for the initial stage, but 3, 4 or 5... and end up with much more (unknown) operating sprinklers at the end, thus overtaxing your sprinkler protection.

I had once this particular issue in the automotive industry where they stored large plastic parts (bumpers....) in racks, and it became a nightmare for the sprinkler protection.
The better option, if you have a limited amount of apllet loads, is to store them on pile storage arrangement and to keep the rack for smaller footprint pallet loads.

Reply
Robert Anderson
5/27/2021 07:18:42 pm

I agree with everything you said related to horizontal fire spread. The concept of Placement of Loads creating solid shelving has been in the Code for several years now, but I visit so many facilities that have racks with oversized pallets, door slabs, lumber, pipe, sofas, hand stacked loads without transverse flues, etc. where this issue has not been address. If there was any gray area in the language it appears NFPA doubled down on the concept in the 2019 Code.

Reply
Franck
5/28/2021 02:36:55 am

Note that for solid shelves between 20 sq ft and 64 sq ft – as measured between aisles and flue spaces – in rack sprinklers must be added, but not necessarily below every shelf (depending on arrangement).
They should be installed below every shelves when the solid shelves are above 64 sq ft.

Reply
franck
5/27/2021 10:09:48 am

Just to add a personnal view (to be discussed with the AHJ / Insurance company) : maybe the class I commodity storage is not much of an issue, in particular if you design your entire storage area for a class III commodity storage, as you will have safety margin from the class III commodity design to cope with the adverse conditions on your class I commodity storage.

You can also add some safety factors by using a larger design area (i.e. not the point for 2000 sq ft, but the one for 3000 sq ft on your design curves from chapter 21.4.1.2) and / or a larger design density (such as the one for the 4 ft aisles, even though you have 8+ ft aisles, for example...).

For the class III commodity, I would better stick with additional in-racks.

Reply
Franck
5/28/2021 02:35:37 am

Some additional information:

Tests performed with or without solid shelving demonstrated that fire travel was more horizontal than vertical during the early stages of a fire with solid shelves.

This created a broader base and fast spreading fire, making it extremely difficult for sprinklers to work effectively.
Ceiling sprinklers were delayed in operation and did not reach the base of the fire because of the shielding of the shelves. In all tests, the fire was not controlled when solid shelves were present and a large amount of sprinklers operated, whatever the design density at the ceiling level.

In-rack sprinklers were not as effective as when installed in an open rack (no shelves) because the fire spread was faster than the sprinklers could operate.
Following is a further explanation:
• In-rack sprinklers that are situated in open flues do not normally operate until they are engulfed in flames.
o With open racks (no shelves), this is normally fast enough as flames tend to travel faster vertically than horizontally.
o With in-rack sprinklers in open longitudinal flues and with solid shelves covering the transverse flue spaces, this is normally not fast enough as flames tend to travel faster horizontally than vertically and race ahead of the operating sprinklers.
• In-rack sprinklers that are situated directly under a shelf will operate very fast and ahead of the flames as the heat banks of the shelves to the sprinklers.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT