We are working on a project where the Architect is very particular about the placement of ceiling components, including sprinkler heads. The idea is to line up diffusers, lights, sprinkler heads, smoke detectors etc. The problem is, in several locations, their preferred location will place heads more than 15 feet apart. The obvious solution for him is to require the heads more than 15 feet apart to be extended coverage type.
From a practical standpoint, it doesn't make sense to scatter extended coverage heads throughout the project as it becomes an installation and maintenance (heads that down the road needing replacement may be replaced with standard coverage by mistake) nightmare. Is there anything in the code preventing the installation of extended coverage and standard coverage heads of the same style (i.e. concealer style) in the same area? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Wayne Ammons
2/23/2022 06:48:09 am
You can mix standard spray sprinklers and extended coverage spray sprinklers within the same compartment as long as they are the same response and the spacing requirements for each type of sprinkler is maintained. If your standard spray sprinklers are quick response, your extended coverage spray sprinklers will need to be listed as quick response as well.
Reply
Alex
2/23/2022 07:09:22 am
HI,
Reply
Anthony
2/23/2022 07:39:06 am
I'd suggest using concealed type sprinklers the cover plates look the same on each.
Reply
Jesse
2/23/2022 08:09:25 am
Yep, as long as the response is the same.
Reply
Glenn Berger
2/23/2022 08:11:18 am
Mixing standard (coverage) pendent and extended coverage pendent in the same ceiling plane is a bad idea. I would ensure that the requirements for extended coverage sprinklers are met and use these throughout the given space.
Reply
Mike
2/23/2022 08:11:28 am
I thought mixing heads of different orifices within the same compartment was not permitted. Can't remember the section.
Reply
Cliff Schulze
2/23/2022 08:45:16 am
The code prohibits using different orifice sizes to minimize sprinkler discharge (NFPA 13 -2013 23.4.4.8.2). Obviously you can mix orifice sizes in situations like hotel rooms where you have an extended coverage sidewall protecting the sleeping area and a standard coverage head in the entry way.
Reply
Mike
2/23/2022 09:39:42 am
You're correct.
CJ
2/23/2022 08:46:23 am
This is allowed per the standard. Be careful of a few items:
Reply
Fred Walker
2/23/2022 09:26:57 am
Remember our job as FPE is to ensure proper fire and life safety, not to drive the Arch decisions. We have a tool bag that allows us choices which permit us to achieve our goals and permit the Arch to achieve their design intent and goals, giving the customer a safe and Arch pleasing environment.
Reply
Dave
2/23/2022 10:39:47 am
CJ covered the considerations that come to my mind, and I frequently (but not every time) mix standard coverage and EC. I often have a room (classroom for example) where four EC sprinklers make more sense than none standard coverage sprinklers, but perhaps there is an additional nook or door alcove that needs an additional sprinkler, and I might use a standard coverage sprinkler for that small area. Or in a corridor where corridor sprinklers give me the flexibility to spread them out but I need sprinklers for pockets that have significant shadowing.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop November '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
December 2024
PE PREP SERIES |