On an exterior patio, is there anything in NFPA 13 that allows you to protect from the building to the column only? Or are we required to protect to the edge of the overhang? In this case it makes the difference in extended coverage dry sidewalls and a dry system. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
15 Comments
Dan Wilder
7/3/2023 07:42:23 am
NFPA 13 2022 Edition - Section 9.5.1.3 is the closest I can think of to consider this, but the picture leads me to believe that this construction would not comply but Section 9.2.3.4/9.3.19 are clear on the requirements to sprinkler beneath.
Reply
Jesse
7/3/2023 08:06:32 am
Short of the workarounds Dan mentioned, I think you're looking at a dry system.
Reply
Glenn Berger
7/3/2023 08:12:49 am
You basically answered your own question here. The strictest interpretation of NFPA 13 would require the dry sprinkler system in the application mentioned.
Reply
Jay
7/3/2023 09:26:23 am
Is sprinkler protection required under this exterior roof?
Reply
empty
7/3/2023 11:20:02 am
(commenting for notifications, this discussion is informative)
Reply
Anthony
7/3/2023 11:41:34 am
I honestly don't see the need for sprinklers. The entire construction is noncombustible and in my reading of NFPA 13 the need for protection is not required. I would verify with your AHJ and layout your concerns.
Reply
Franck
7/3/2023 01:15:07 pm
I fully agree with Anthony’s comments.
Reply
Streeter
7/3/2023 05:41:24 pm
Aren't the benches that are called out as being made of wood an issue in this case?
Reply
Matt C.
7/4/2023 07:16:10 am
I think it may be difficult to argue that the presence of a wood furnishing constitutes reclassifying the building as 'combustible construction'
Matt C.
7/4/2023 07:25:20 am
Also, furnishings in assembly occupancies (which is what I'm assuming this is) are typically required to be rated or otherwise treated for flame spread.
Robert Morgan
7/3/2023 05:04:46 pm
What happens when during cold (or hot) weather there are side panels installed. If the building it is attached to requires sprinklers how do we get around sprinkling this space? We have had many covered patios/canopies that were not initially sprinkled but later added side panels, heaters (sometimes gas). Does this not become an extension of the building? Most of the Fire Marshals I have consulted with along with ICC and NFPA have advised me that under these conditions these areas should be sprinkled.
Reply
Matt C.
7/4/2023 07:20:49 am
If the initial construction is such that these panels are part of the design of the building, then yes absolutely. Otherwise, who are we to speculate on construction that has not been specified and is not a part of any current scope.
Reply
Alan Barnhizer
7/5/2023 04:51:14 pm
Is this part of an A2 occupancy? Because it looks like an outdoor dining/bar area. In Ohio the building code reads the following:
Reply
Patrick Drumm
7/9/2023 12:22:48 pm
It has to be frustrating to the original poster that almost 50% of the responses are not trying to answer the question asked, but prove that protection is not needed and his/her question is void. In a lot of states, these exterior overhangs are required to be protected to the building code so even though the construction is non-combustible the poster may live in one of these states where the overhang is required to be protected. I'm all for adding additional information for insight, but not answering the question and then questioning the validity of the question, seems unproductive.
Reply
Chris
7/13/2023 01:58:27 pm
I would say if you are protecting anything under that canopy then you will be protecting the whole thing.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Feb '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
April 2025
PE PREP SERIES |