MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

How to Adequately Sprinkler Suspended Art?

3/27/2023

18 Comments

 
I am currently working with a few artists that want to build an installation in the lobby of a high-rise office building.

Their design includes hanging acrylic bats independently hung from wires from the ceiling at varying heights to represent a bat swarm. What started as “a couple hundred bats, 6-8 inches in size, spaced evenly throughout the lobby” has turned into 1,300 bats, up to 12 inches wide, in a fairly dense swarm.

The artists and interior designers submitted this design to the AHJ without providing a final design or correspondence and were rejected (no surprise.) The rejection was based on the swarm obstructed both by being within 2 feet of the head, and the density of the bats.
Picture
Additionally they are worried about the flammability of the bats and want them tested per NFPA 289 to make sure the amount of acrylic has a heat release rate of less than 100 KW.

My questions here are two-fold:

1) How would one properly protect, or space these bats, so that sprinkler protection is not an issue?

At what density would hanging items like these turn into an obstruction, and once they are considered an obstruction, would the only way to solve the issue be to sprinkler both above and below the swarm?

2) Has anyone ever worked with NFPA 289?

I have been looking for information on heat release rate of acrylic or any plastic in general, who would test items to the NFPA 289 standard?

Or is there any information on how to properly categorize this hazard and determine if the heat release rate is less than 100 KW?

Looking forward to any thoughts. Thanks.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
18 Comments
Glenn Berger
3/27/2023 08:08:14 am

I have no experience with NFPA 289, but I have had a similar experience.

I worked with the AHJ with a recommendation of provided projected beam smoke detection below the obstruction level. This solution was accepted and when the obstruction was removed the smoke detection system was removed.

Reply
Schulman
3/27/2023 08:12:01 am

Sounds awesome.
It does not take much to create an obstruction - think about grating or walkways above theaters with grating ... usually required above and below ... I have worked on some cool ceilings in my day .. all required above and below coverage ... good luck.

Reply
Dan Wilder
3/27/2023 08:23:20 am

Independent testing is going to be time consuming and exspensive. Any option to place them on a link release for what I am assuming is the cable supports that support these units?

Check out your local Museum/Art Expo halls and find out what they provide for density, area, and sprinkler types (some modified design density approach), those have similar obstruction exhibits. You can also get an FPE involved to come up with a AM&M approach with some heat release calculations and design approaches.

Reply
Jesse
3/27/2023 08:28:59 am

Well this one's a mess isn' it.

Agree with Dan about the timeliness about testing. I'd be surprised if you had actionable results in 6 months. I like Dan's link idea.

My 2 cents, these present an obstruction to AS discharge.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
3/27/2023 09:07:00 am

Is this going in the new Wayne Industries HQ? I think the original was blown up, so probably good idea to sprinkler it. I would go with an OH2 for the whole building, at the very least.

Sorry, couldn't help myself.... lol.

But in all seriousness, I agree on the involvement of a FPE. If you are a contractor, you don't want to make the call on this one.

BUT, I would think an increased density at the ceiling, closer spacing of heads, along with requiring X percent to be open by total horizontal area would be a good start. Activation time and coverage.

Reply
Anthony
3/28/2023 07:57:34 am

Came here to make this joke, great job.

Reply
M. Newell
3/27/2023 09:29:27 am

I have seen instances where they have protected areas like this as EH-2. They in theory said the application was comparable to a heavily shielded fire. It could be one option you look at offering to the AHJ/Design Team. Since it would cover high heat release fires, and shielding so two-birds one-stone method. IMHO.

Reply
Franck
3/27/2023 11:44:33 am

One practical question: is there something to burn underneath ?

The fact that it is 2 feet below the sprinkler is fine (as with standard sprinklers you need 36 in. between sprinkler and top of storage).

If the bats are burning, you will cover them with the sprinklers.
And if there is nothing to burn underneath... well, in that case, the sprinkler protection is not really needed under the obstruction created by the bats.

I don't see a possible quick spreading fire (that could overtax the sprinkler protection, as it is not combustible dust deposit, but quite large objects).

In addition, as bats are hung by a wire, it also means that the water discharge will probably wet adjacent non burning bats and remove them (pushed by water) from the burning ones.
As long as the bats are not attached to sprinkler piping!
I would be more concerned with life bats flying all over the place and distributing the fire through multiple ignition sources :)

Increasing the sprinkler density in an existing situation is quite complex, and by the time you did it, the exhibit is gone (and while you do it, you still have the problem and no fire protection at all !).

Comment from Glen si quite fair. provide temporary beam detection below the bats. Sprinklers above for fire on the bats. Smoke detection below fo anything that could happen underneath.

But this is my personal opinion, not to be considered as what the AHJ would say or accept.

Reply
Franck
3/27/2023 11:49:29 am

In addition to my above comments, one of my concerns in your situation, is not that the heat release will be tremendous (you have many bats, but this is not plastic storage in racks over 20 ft), but on the contrary that the bats will burn, but heat release will not be sufficient to operate the sprinklers, and the fire will gently spread throughout all your bats, without any sprinkler operating.

The good thing is : there should be limited ignition sources over there, so limited probablility to have a fire (even though the consequence would be the same... if it happens anyway).

Reply
Shawn G.
3/27/2023 12:17:01 pm

FM has approaches that deal with grouped obstructions. These bats don't really fit nicely into that criteria, but it could provide some guidance to assist you in finding an answer to your first question.

Reply
Dave
3/27/2023 12:35:49 pm

What does the cauldron look like in plan / RCP view? Are they throughout the lobby?

Reply
Dave
3/27/2023 12:39:31 pm

...I guess what I'm wondering, is it roughly solid as the parameters of the two elevation views above indicate?

Reply
Jerry Clark
3/27/2023 12:40:00 pm

Just dealt with a similar issue involving acrylic spheres used as a center feature with lights powered by stationary bikes. Referred to Chapter 26 of the IBC which covers plastics. Most of the chapter deals specifically with plastic used as architectural features versus artwork. But Section 2606.4 is specific to self-ignition temps, smoke development ratings, with direct reference to testing standards:

2606.4 Specifications
Light-transmitting plastics, including thermoplastic, thermosetting or reinforced thermosetting plastic material, shall have a self-ignition temperature of 650°F (343°C) or greater where tested in accordance with ASTM D1929; a smoke-developed index not greater than 450 where tested in the manner intended for use in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, or a maximum average smoke density rating not greater than 75 where tested in the thickness intended for use in accordance with ASTM D2843 and shall conform to one of the following combustibility classifications:

Class CC1: Plastic materials that have a burning extent of 1 inch (25 mm) or less where tested at a nominal thickness of 0.060 inch (1.5 mm), or in the thickness intended for use, in accordance with ASTM D635.

Class CC2: Plastic materials that have a burning rate of 21/2 inches per minute (1.06 mm/s) or less where tested at a nominal thickness of 0.060 inch (1.5 mm), or in the thickness intended for use, in accordance with ASTM D635.

Reply
Pete H
3/27/2023 01:25:57 pm

2) Nope. Never.

1) Decide every clump of bats is a duct. Never let the clumps exceed 4'-0" wide without some spacing between them and the next clump of bats. If they exceed 4'-0" wide, spray underneath the hanging obstruction.

Make sure there is an 18" clearance between the top of bats and the deflector of your sprinklers.

For unnecessary fun: Drop exposed pendent sprinklers in the middle of clumps of bats and add Bat-wings to the frame arms.

Reply
Don Pierce link
3/27/2023 03:53:39 pm

I have had scenarios such as this come up multiple times. Often the "architectural feature" is in an atrium and not only poses an obstruction to sprinklers getting to the fire but adversely affects the smoke control system activation. It is a domino effect. Delayed sprinkler activation and mechanical smoke ventilation increased temperatures that were not survivable at the upper floors. Dan Wilder gives good advice. Get a FPE for an AMM. Unfortunately liability drives most decisions. This is one of them.

Reply
Pete D.
3/27/2023 07:49:05 pm

I just wanted to quickly provide my in-depth professional assessment, that this seems like something an interior designer would submit to an AHJ.

Reply
Street
3/29/2023 09:55:08 am

Spot on

Reply
Sean
3/31/2023 11:27:10 am

I think that without further information or justification I would consider it an obstruction.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT