MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Design for Actual or Potential Storage Height?

4/13/2020

11 Comments

 
Low-piled storage versus design /area method: I notice a quite huge difference about requirements of NFPA 13 for using low-piled storage where where is no limitation for area and the method when the virtual storage height is used to determine according to the clearance the area / density method.

For example we can have a building with a high clearance with Group A plastic storage as low-piled at 5-feet (1.3 m). Using the low-piled method, you need Ordinary Hazard Group 2 0.20 gpm/sqft @ 1,500 sqft (7.5 l/min/m² @ 210 m²) when using ara /density method, but with the virtual height you need more than 0.73 gpm/sqft (30 l/min/m² @ 230 m²). In my example, the area of low piled storage is a very huge area 170,000 sqft (10,000 m²).

What is the actual criteria? Thanks for your comments.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
11 Comments
Dan Wilder
4/13/2020 08:56:27 am

Our AHJ's have taken the approach that the fire sprinkler design must be for a worst case height (or max clearance modification) of Group A Plastics to the highest point in the building bottom of roof.

They modified the IFC Chapter 32 to state:
"Minimum design requirements for speculative warehouses. The design of the automatic sprinkler system for speculative Group M, S or F occupancies shall be based on storage of a cartoned Class A non-expanded plastic to the available storage height. The storage height shall be determined by subtracting 48 inches from the highest point of the roof above each
system for ESFR and 30 inches for area density
applications."

The only exception to this is if the owner signs paperwork that the storage will be kept to a specific height, commodity, and storage configuration and then the address is tagged with the info. We clarify in our bids what the design will be (typically the worst case) unless we get specific info otherwise and then we push to get meetings with the AHJ early to verify their design request before submittal.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
4/13/2020 10:04:45 am

Dan, that is very forward thinking of the AHJ. Just curious which AHJ this is, where located?

Reply
sean
4/13/2020 02:07:20 pm

I don't know where dan is but I see that in multiple towns in the chicagoland area.

Dan Wilder
4/13/2020 08:01:15 pm

City of Phoenix specifically but the surround jurisdictions have adopted similar measures.

Casey Milhorn
4/14/2020 08:51:35 am

Thanks Dan and Sean. Good to know the trends and different requirements out there. This is definitely an issue in some areas of the Southeast. Spec warehouses with no idea of the tenant, or an idea, but everyone is being secretive about who it is and what they are using the space for.

James
4/14/2020 08:54:01 am

Casey that sounds like a near-impossibility to design for! It's hard enough to get storage information from owners who know what they want to store... let alone a mystery future tenant.

It's not like most owners just walk up and are willing to pay for everyone to design for the worst-case scenario.

Dan Wilder
4/14/2020 11:55:12 am

James - When the FD has an incident with loss of life because owners went the cheap route to build their building (OH2 in a 30' tall building), getting legislation passed to add these kinds of measures becomes really easy.

Unfortunately, it takes a loss like this to get them to be "forward thinking" even though they are just playing catch up.

The design may not capture everything, but it captures most scenarios.

James
4/14/2020 12:03:08 pm

Dan - Understood. Personally I like the concepts you've mentioned of forcing the design to the conservative scenario unless the owner specifically directs otherwise with storage information. When the AHJ writes/enforces it that's even better as I don't have to be the bad guy as an engineer.

FIREPE25
4/13/2020 02:46:07 pm

I am not sure if i am understanding your question correctly, but i will give it a shot. I think you are saying that you cannot meet the definition of miscellaneous storage because your area of storage is too large. This can be a problem in certain instances because if you cannot be classified as miscellaneous storage then NFPA 13 requires that you design to the acceptable clearances established in Chapter 12 (2013ed.). For Group A plastics these clearances are either 10'-0" or 20'-0" (depending on situation). However, in your example you say you only have 5'-0" of Group A plastics. If you look at 15.2.1 (solid piled group A plastics) and read the commentary that goes along with it from the handbook you do not need to obey any area requirements for less than 5'-0" of storage.

Reply
Pete D
4/13/2020 03:36:46 pm

I always designed for the highest height achievable with the water supply, neglecting the relatively small cost of larger orifice sprinklers. If there's a pump/ no pump cost consideration, and the design is for a specific occupant, I would put the storage height limitation on the riser placard. This should be satisfactory for that occupant to obtain a U&O permit from the AHJ. I suspect your question is about maximum clearance to storage which comes into play with plastics and tires. Where a maximum clearance to storage is required, you have to design for the storage height that would result in that clearance (varies with building height). It shouldn't come into play for 5 ft storage height.

Reply
Franck
4/14/2020 10:16:29 am

As a summary to all above comments (and point of view from Insurance industry), if the storage is always below 5 ft, as already indicated by Firepe25, you have to use the miscelaneous storage requirement for 5 ft of plastic.

But if you go above 5 ft, then you have to take the "clearance" requirement into consideration and you will end up with a huge difference in term of density.

We apply such recommendations in the insurance industry when we have a given density and the storage is "too high", giving alternative such as :
the sprinkler protection in the area should be upgraded and designed to deliver a minimum density of 0.73 gpm/sq ft over xx sq ft (as you suggested in your example) or the storage height of group A plastics should be limited to 5 ft.

We have the same approach with idle pallets (you will see that we have much more flexibility for wooden pallets up to 6 ft or plastic pallets up to 4 ft, as long as you can limit the number of stacks).

Then I understand the conservative approach from some AHJ, especially in the design phase of a project, as, if you can store higher, there will be a time when you will store higher...

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​July '22 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT