MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Are Flexible Couplings Req'd For Tall Riser?

9/19/2023

10 Comments

 
Are flexible couplings required at riser for vertical support?

My project has a vertical support for a 30-ft long 6-inch riser.

I used a riser clamp with two wall-mounted welded brackets to provide vertical load hanger at about 20-ft AFF.

The inspector commented that I have to provide a flexible coupling above and below within 24" of the point of attachment. His reasoning is: 18.2.3.1(6) NFPA 13 2022 edition (6) Within 24 in. above and 24 in below any intermediate points of support for a riser or other vertical pipe.

Anyone has suggestion for better way to put a vertical support at the riser?

Is one ATR hanger at the top of the riser sufficient?

Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Jim Phifer
9/19/2023 08:22:41 am

You didn't state if this project was located within an earthquake zone.
Chapter 18 only applies where seismic protection is required. If it is a requirement, then yes, the flexible couplings are required.

Reply
Jesse
9/19/2023 08:31:23 am

Is your project in a seismic zone.

Reply
Todd
9/19/2023 08:45:34 am

What is the building's Seismic Design Catagory?

That will determine if seismic restraint is required or not.

Buildings can be within 'seismic zones' and not require seismic restraint.

Reply
Brad K
9/19/2023 09:02:09 am

Addressing the top of riser bracing. If Seismic is required, 13-18.5.8 (2019) shall be provided with a four-way brace.
If Not Seismic, I recommend considering a four-way brace if there are no other means of horizontal support like a landing within 7 to 10 ft. I don't think the ATR would be adequate.

Reply
Inspector
9/19/2023 09:12:00 am

I have to say as an inspector, I think this is a good catch. I understand that it may be inconvenient, but having that much vertical pipe above and below that support could cause a lot of pressure at the support if the building/sprinkler system were to shift back and forth. Even if the sprinkler system is braced throughout, the wall where your support is on the riser could move independently of the sprinkler pipe and cause an issue. Limiting the movement of the pipe could cause it to break disabling the entire system.

Even assuming there was no fire to accompany the seismic event, the massive flooding that would occur from a 6 inch riser pouring into the building would be a disaster.

Reply
Dan Wilder
9/19/2023 09:43:43 am

The first question is a little confusing (couplings don't provide support), so I am reading it as "Are flexible couplings required on a riser at the point of vertical support". This is also assuming this is a seismic application but since soo many AHJ's apply riser requirements to non-seismic areas, any reference from Chapter 18 technically should not apply.

As for vertical support, I've seen horizontal offsets to catch hangers or a riser clamp (via a knee bracket like an Eaton B3067 or similar based on structural approvals)

Looking at Chapter 17 first, based on that total distance of a riser, you'll need 2 points of support - Top & Intermediate:

17.4.5.1 - Risers to be supported by clamps or hangers on the horizontal connection within 24" of the C.L. of the riser.

17.4.5.5 for distance between supports not exceeding 25' (technically in multistory buildings but tall buildings tend to get lumped into this requirement), an intermediate support is required based on a total riser length of 30'.

Then Chapter 18 for where flex couplings are required (again, based on seismic requirements):

18.2.3.1 (1) Flex coupling required within 24" of the top and bottom of all risers.
18.2.3(6) then requires a flexible coupling within 24" above & below the intermediate support for a riser.

The only technical work around would be to have a horizontal offset somewhere below the 25' mark, provide the flex couplings and hanger as required for the initial vertical run, provide the 4-way brace and hanger (top of riser), then continue vertical for the last bit but as the pipe is still considered a "riser", you'll need to provide one additional flex coupling (riser is greater than 3' but less than 7') and an additional 4-way brace (18.5.8.1 as the last piece exceeds 36") so in the end, it's not saving anything if in a seismic area.



Reply
DAVE
9/19/2023 01:10:14 pm

^^ This.
Distance between supports for risers shall not exceed 25 ft.
9.2.5.5 (2016); 17.4.5.5 (2019)

Flexible couplings shall be installed…. Within 24 in. above and 24 in. below any intermediate points of support for a riser or other vertical pipe
9.3.2.3.1(6) (2016); 18.2.3.1(6) (2019)
This is under “Multistory Buildings” however I would think the upward thrust / axial expansion mentioned in the handbook commentary applies for any similar situation.

Reply
James Art, FPE
9/20/2023 10:42:50 am

SOME FLEXIBILITY:
NFPA 13 recommends the sprinkler system move with the building in most places, and perhaps unintentionally encourages rigid mechanical couplings (to eliminate some braces).

I live in EQ country (and note that other areas not so classified,like near the Mississippi, may possibly have seismic events).
I inspected over 50 high rises after the Loma Prieta,
and I have a different suggestion:

A little movement may be good, better than breaking.
I encourage the USE OF FLEXIBLE Grooved Mechanical Couplings, especially at corners, where main pipes change directions.

Jim

Reply
Luis
11/21/2023 02:47:20 pm

So if I have a riser in a vertical pipe chase, without floor penetration or offsets, and I support it via brackets anchored to a wall, for example, every 10ft, I would need to place 2 flexible couplings near each bracket?

Reply
Luis
11/21/2023 02:48:44 pm

(Assuming it is on a high seismic area)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT