MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Two Remote Fire Pumps for One Building?

6/7/2021

4 Comments

 
We are designing a warehouse which has a system demand of about 150 psi at 2,000 gpm.

There is an existing facility with a 150 psi @ 1,000 gpm rated pump installed approximately 1/4-mile (350 m) from the warehouse. We are planning to add a new 150 psi pump at 1,000 gpm near the warehouse roughly 65-feet (20 m) from it. 

Is there any code limitation we might hit to serve one building with two separate pumping stations installed remote from each other?

How would you recommend we set the pump operation sequence for the two pump rooms?

Each pump room will have an electric, diesel, and jockey pump. Thanks in advance.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments
Dan Wilder
6/7/2021 08:19:12 am

Couple questions:

-Are these pumps setup in series due to the distance between buildings (thus not allowing a full 2000 GPM supply to the second building) or is there actually 2 separate fire lines to allow a parallel installation?
-Is the water supply sized correctly before the split to accept up to a 3000 GPM demand when the pumps are tested at 150% and not take the pumps into a negative suction pressure scenario?
-Both buildings have the same owner? Different owners would create a huge liability for the 2nd, larger demand building.

Due to the distance of the pumps to each other, I would set the closest pump to its adjoining building, to start first , then have the second pump kick on when the pressure drops (Use the formula in A.14.2.6 _ 20-19 ED.) however the issue will be not setting the 1st pump (original) to start too low because it is still a primary for the first building. There may be some trial and error getting pressures set right to accommodate scenarios in both buildings as the couple of times I have done this in the past the pumps were much closer together.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
6/7/2021 09:12:40 am

Same questions as Dan. Will the pumps be in parallel and at what point do the supplies join back together? I would definitely involve a good local pump rep that has done this type of setup before. This is similar to a redundant pump setup for high-rises. It may take the better part of a day playing around with the pressures until you get it right.

Reply
CJ Bonczyk
6/7/2021 09:23:00 am

I concur with Dan there is a bit more information that is needed in order to give you a more definitive answer. I would also strongly suggest contacting the local AHJ and advise them of the situation as they may have local requirements that do or do not allow this setup as the location and accesses are required to be preplanned with the fire department per NFPA 20 § 4.14.1.1.4 & 4.14.2.1

Additionally, based on your last sentence in your question are you stating that each remote house will house a main electric and back up diesel pump? In your prior information it sounds as there is is only one single pump in each house? I apologize for any confusion on my end.

If the intent is that they are to operate in series they are required within 20 seconds after a demand to start, pumps in series shall supply and maintain stable discharge pressures +/_ 10% throughout its entire range of operation. Also, if in series they are required to adhere to the requirements of 4.21.2.2.

Reply
Franck
6/7/2021 10:45:15 am

It is not uncommon to have fire pumps set up as 2 separate water supplies.
For insurance purposes, when the insured values are high (or if the process is critical, as for nuclear power plants), it is a common recommended practice.
And again, for reliability purposes, it is better to have them in separate places (so that in case of fire, flood...) you may have only one affected at a time.

This being said, as long as they supply the same fire main and you have a Jockey pump to keep the pressure, the starting sequences are exactly the same, if you have separate pumps as if they are in the same area.

In reality, one fire pump house is the back up of the other (these are not 50% duty pumps) and under normal conditions, you should start only one of these pumps, the other ones being used only in case of impairment/no start.

You don't really care if your system is able to receive 3000 gpm or 6000 gpm. If it can't, the pumps will not be operating at 150% anyway at the same time (they cannot deliver more that what the system is able to receive), but probably both operating at 80%. It will only result in a higher pressure in your system for the same flow when both pumps are operating.
It is the same when one sprinkler is operating. Your branch line is not able to accept 1500 gpm, so the pump is operating at 20% of its capacity...
It may be problematic if they all start at the same time (within a fraction of second), but normally you have a delay.

Regarding the setting, as indicated above by other peers, you will find it in NFPA 20 (do not forget the annex section A14.2.6 as mentioned by Dan) for the pressure setting, in order to limit the water hammer).
The only thing you need to consider, when setting the start of the fire pumps, is the possible difference of elevation, as the pressure maitained by the jockey pumps in your system will not be the same at both pumphouse if they are at different height.

Pressures for the automatic start (and stop of the Jockey pump) should be set according to the following (for several pumps):
• Cut-out Jockey Pump : Pressure of the fire pump at churn
• Cut-in Jockey Pump : Cut-out Pressure of Jockey pump – 10 psi
• Cut-in Pump #1 : Cut-in Jockey Pump – 5 psi
• Cut-in Pump #2 : Cut-in Pump #1 – 5 psi
Cut-in Pump #3 : Cut-in Pump #2 – 5 psi
Etc.

You may also go up to a difference of 10 psi instead of 5 psi.

The above mentioned settings are provided to avoid a possible water hammer effect and to limit the delay of activation of the fire pumps in case of fire.

If water requirements call for more than one pumping unit to operate, the units should start at intervals of 5 to 10 seconds.

Example for 3 pumps in parallel arrangement set at 0, 10 and 20 seconds with a sudden large pressure drop:
• Lead pump: no delay (immediate starting); if the pressure remains low, then
• Second pump: 10 seconds; if the pressure remains low, then
• Third pump: 20 seconds

This sequential starting is absolutely necessary, otherwise in case of a sudden sharp drop in pressure, all the switches would trip at the same time.
Where this rule is not adhered to, pump houses have been destroyed when the surge of tons of water breaks the headers or elbows in the underground piping.

Note that this time delay in the starting sequence is only necessary when more than 1 pump is necessary (50% duty pumps, for example).

The only thing that is "strange" in your arrangement, is that apprently you already have one diesel and one electric in the first pump house, and you add one diesel and one electric in the second one. Which means that you will end up with 4 x 100%...
Waow, that's reliability !
Looks like a nuclear power plant!




Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​May '22 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • Content Library
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT