MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

PVC Allowed for Remote Underground FDC Feed?

5/15/2020

9 Comments

 
Have a project which has a remote fire department connection outside of the main building. The fire department connection has its own dedicated feed that goes from the remote FDC, underground, up into the building, where it connects to the fire sprinkler riser downstream of the backflow preventer.

The check valve for this line is required to be inside the building, so the main between the FDC and check valve in the building is intended to be dry.

NFPA 24 (if that applies) allows PVC for underground water service in its table of permitted pipe types.

NFPA 13 specifically states that galvanized steel is permitted to be used between the FDC and the check valve serving the FDC. I can't see where NFPA 13 would mandate pipe types for this arrangement.

Is this underground FDC feed allowed to be PVC?

​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Wes
5/15/2020 09:59:40 am

A few references:
- NFPA 24 allows water service pipe to be PVC, but has no mention of different pipe types for typically dry mains (NFPA 24-2019 Table 10.1.1.1).
- NFPA 13 permits this FDC feed to be galvanized steel, but does not mandate any pipe type for this application (NFPA 13-2019 10.1.1.3). Commentary states this approach is possible, but coating and wrapping would be necessary.
- NFPA 13 permits unprotected cast-iron or ductile-iron where jointed with gasketed joint for air service underground (NFPA 13-2019 6.1.1.4.2). This pipe is not pressurized, however, as a dry system routed underground would be.
- Cutsheets for AWWA C900 PVC pipe don't appear to exclude normally-dry applications.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
5/15/2020 12:47:28 pm

Lots of great comments. One additional thing to watch for is the class of C900 pipe. Years ago DR-18 was listed to 150 psi if I remember correctly, which ruled it out for use on an FDC line that may be pressurized over that. Now DR-18 is listed for 235 psi, and DR-14 is listed for 315 psi (from memory, did not verify the pressures). So in most applications DR-14 and DR-18 should be acceptable as long as the application isn't in a fire district where there SOP require pressures over 235 psi. You definitely probably want to avoid DR-21 or 25.

Reply
Mike
5/15/2020 10:30:27 am

Why is the check valve required in the building?

If I remember correctly, the FDC check needs to be replaced verified that it opens every 5 years. That's going to be a mess if it's inside the building.

No mention of freezing conditions in OP. I'm in SoCal so we don't have freezing conditions. I don't know how East Coasters do it.

Thanks for the question.

Reply
Wes
5/15/2020 10:32:49 am

The AHJ is requiring it inside the building - I'm guessing so that it is accessible for testing and not buried below grade.

Freezing is not a concern for this project. It's in an area that could freeze, but freezing is not a specific concern for this pipe.

Reply
Shane
5/15/2020 12:52:51 pm

I had the same question on the check valve location in reference to the FDC. I have always put the check valve close to the yard FDC to keep it full of water to prevent all the air being pushing into a system during a fire. Although, I have recently be corrected in rather rude response that I should know my code and to look up, NFPA 14 6.4.2: Locate the check valve as near as practicable to the point at where it joins the system. I understand keeping the pipe dry in freezing locations, but I am in Florida.

Reply
Rob
5/15/2020 11:08:46 am

On a lot of projects, the piping for the fireline and remote FDC line are on the Civil Drawings and will call out the materials based on local requirements. In a lot of jurisdictions what materials and installation practices are dictated by the local municipalities public engineering department or water department. Usually what I have seen even in a dry remote FDC line is either C900 or ductile iron pipe, usually with a ductile spool (flanged) to come up above grade. Hope that helps.

Reply
Jonathan Joseph
5/15/2020 11:24:00 am

I don't see a problem with the pipe material as long as you restrain it well and make sure it is at least 1 foot below the frost line.

It will be up to your AHJ but my main worry about non pressurized FDC is that pedestrians could throw trash in the FDC.

Make sure that AHJ is ok with having locking FDC plugs

Reply
Richard Mercer
5/15/2020 12:27:39 pm

You did not mention the version of NFPA 13 the Jurisdiction references. the 2019 NFPA 13 Hand Book had an FAQ for table 6.1.1.1.

"The use of plastic pipe, including polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE), and oriented polyvinyl chloride (PVCO), are now included in Table 6.1.1.1 for use in underground systems, provided the piping is manufactured in accordance with the referenced AWWA standards. Listings are available for PVC and PVCO pipe and couplings for underground fire service."

Reply
Wes
5/15/2020 12:28:57 pm

Thanks Richard - it is the 2019 Edition. I was just curious if it being typically dry changes the material requirements at all.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top June '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT