MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Does My Unit Require a Duct Smoke Detector?

1/29/2020

 
On every project containing fire alarm design I come across the same question repeatedly - does this unit require a duct detector?

In short, there's two prevailing standards that determine whether duct detection is required. The first (and most common in the United States), is the International Mechanical Code (IMC). Section 606.2 identifies areas where smoke detection is required for the purpose of mechanical unit shutdown.

The other prevailing standard is NFPA 90A, the Standard for Installation of Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems. I'll address those requirements in a later post.

Back to the question at hand - there's essentially six different scenarios a mechanical unit can fall into under the International Mechanical Code. These do not include the requirement for multi-level duct risers over 15,000 CFM, but rather whether an individual unit requires detection at the unit.

​Here is a quick cheatsheet summary concerning those scenarios:
​
Duct Detector Cheatsheet
GET THE DUCT-DETECTOR CHEATSHEET

If you review or design fire alarm systems regularly, take a look and let me know what you think. 

If you know someone who might also benefit from cheatsheets like this, send them a link or tell them to subscribe here.

Hope you find this helpful and have a great rest of your week!
Rusty Scott
1/29/2020 01:36:18 pm

Don't forget about those Remote Alarm LED indicators and key test switches. NFPA 72-2013 & 2016 17.4.7 where "detectors more than 10ft above finished floor or in arrangements where the detector's alarm or supervisory indicator is not visible to responding personnel, the detectors shall be provided with remote alarm or supervisory indication in a location acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction."

I've seen some engineers try to rely on specifications for the contractor to locate the remote indicators on performance design type projects. I believe this may be due to on NFPA 72-2013 (under 7.4 Shop Drawings Installation Documents) 7.4.8 "Typical wiring diagrams shall be provided for all initiating devices, notification appliances, remote indicators, annunciators, remote test stations, and end-of-line and power supervisory devices." So it's putting it off on the contractor to coordinate. I don't believe this is the best/correct/only method, I believe engineers should be discussing & coordinating this information with architects about locating on the floorplan drawings for AHJ's initial review for permitting.

I'm assuming FA contractors price this equipment whether shown on floorplans or not in some way?? I'd be curious to know, because I've never heard any complaints when they weren't shown. I'd be interested to hear someone's thoughts on this if anyone has any experience on it. The person who normally makes the most noise is the architect when walking around the finished product.

Jon Sullivan
2/3/2020 03:53:34 pm

I see these missed a lot, and have missed them myself. I do not think many HVAC engineers are aware of this requirement even though IMC requires NFPA 72 compliance. IMC requires requires the supervision of detector by the fire alarm system and as well as a version of the requirements of NFPA 72 17.4.7. Perhaps many engineers think that the supervision of the detector by the fire alarm system is also assumed to be the visual and audible supervisory signal required at a constantly attended location by both NFPA and IMC.

Joshua Smith
6/12/2020 09:37:49 am

My question is this. Who ultimately is responsible for where duct detectors should be located? I work at an MEP firm and the mechanical engineers refuse to take responsibility for locating them. I see it as a fire alarm device that is located by the mechanical engineer. They do not show them on there documents either.

WES
6/12/2020 09:43:40 am

It's up for debate. Used to work at a large MEP firm and I did a location callout on the fire alarm plans to locate "on return side of mechanical unit" but to refer to the mechanical for exact ductwork and unit locations.

Just my experience, but non-fire people tend to very much not care about fire things.

Joshua Smith
6/12/2020 10:25:16 am

Since the locations are dictated by the IMC and NFPA 90A which are all mechanical code requirements how can it be up for debate? I worked for another firm who only did fire alarm design. In all my years there I never had a mechanical engineer not locate the the duct detectors or not show them on their documents.

I agree about the non-fire people not caring. But if it is a requirement of the code of which you are designing to you must own it in my opinion.

WES
6/12/2020 10:29:11 am

Well said. You convinced me.

... now you just need to convince those mechanicals....


Comments are closed.
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    SUBSCRIBE

    Get Free Articles via Email:
    + Get calculators, tools, resources and articles
    + Get our PDF Flowchart for Canopy & Overhang Requirements instantly
    Picture
    + No spam
    ​+ Unsubscribe anytime
    I'm Interested In:

    AUTHOR

    Joe Meyer, PE, is a Fire Protection Engineer out of St. Louis, Missouri who writes & develops resources for Fire Protection Professionals. See bio here: About


    FILTERS

    All
    Announcements
    Author Jocelyn Sarrantonio PE
    Book Review
    Calculators
    Career
    Course
    Delegated Design
    Design Challenge
    Detail Critique
    Fire Alarm
    Fire Events
    Fire Suppression
    Flammable & Combustible Liquids
    Flexible Drops
    Floor Control Valve
    Life Safety
    News
    NICET
    Opinion
    Passive Fire Protection
    PE Exam
    Perspective
    Pick A Part
    Pick-A-Part
    Products
    Site Updates
    Special Hazards
    Specifications
    Sprinkler Systems
    Standpipes
    Students
    Tools
    Videos


    ARCHIVES

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT