MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Leaders in Flexible Drops

8/31/2016

 
Two weeks ago we covered Benefits and drawbacks of flexible sprinkler drops, and last week we covered Considerations with flexible sprinkler drops. This week we offer a summary of industry leaders in the U.S. market with flexible drop technology. Know someone we're missing? Contact us so we can be sure to provide a thorough summary.
Summary of Leaders in Flexible Drop Technology in the U.S. Market
Having trouble viewing? This table best appears on www.meyerfire.com. Click the link to view.
Supplier
Lengths (inches)
Approvals​
Max. Sprinkler K-Factors
Bend at Nut?
Max 90 Deg. Bends (applicable sizes)
Min. Bend Radius
Source / Website / Pressure Loss
EasyFlex
24, 36, 48, 60, 72
UL/FM
K5.6 for 1/2" outlet (UL/FM)
K8.0 for 3/4" outlet (UL/FM)

No bend within 2.52 inches from connection nut
1 (24)
2 (36)
3 (48)
4 (60, 72)
4 inch (UL)
8 inch (FM)

Link
FlexHead
24, 36, 48, 60, 72
UL/FM
K5.6 for 1/2" outlet (UL/FM)
K14.0 for 3/4" outlet (UL/FM)
K22.4 for 1" outlet (FM)

No limit
3 (24, 36)
4 (48, 60, 72)

3 inch (UL)
8 inch (FM)

Link
Sidewinder
30, 48, 60
FM
None Listed
Not within 2.5" of connection nut or reducer
3 (30, 48, 60)
6 inches (FM)
Link
SprinkFlex
28, 40, 48, 59, 71
UL/FM
K8.0 for 1/2" reducer (UL)
K11.2 for 3/4" reducer (FM)
K5.6 for 1/2" outlet (FM)
K8.0 for 3/4" reducer (FM)
Not within 2" of connection nut
2 (28)
3 (40, 48, 59, 71)

3 inch (UL)
8 inch (FM)

Link
​VicFlex
31, 48, 60, 72
UL/FM
K8.0 for 1/2" reducer (UL)
K14.0 for 3/4" reducer (FM)
K5.6 for 1/2" outlet (FM)
K14.0 for 3/4" reducer (FM)
No limit
3 (31)
4 (36, 48, 60)
5 (72)

2 inch (UL)
​7 inch (FM)
Link
If you find this information helpful and think someone you know might benefit, please send them a link to our Blog and ask them to subscribe. We grow and share information among experts through word of mouth by our subscribers.

Considerations with Flexible Sprinkler Drops

8/25/2016

 
Last week we covered Benefits and Drawbacks of Flexible Sprinkler Drops, and this week's post covers things to consider when using the technology.

Maximum Bends
  • The listing for each product limits the maximum number of bends that the installation can use
  • The greater number of bends allowed will help allow for flexibility in the actual installation (to avoid obstructions), but the greater number of bends used also significantly impacts friction loss within the drop.
  • It's important to also verify the actual number of bends used in installation so that the install does not violate the manufacturer's listing.
​
Maximum K-Factors
  • There are limits to sprinkler k-factors provided with flexible drops. These limitations are listed in the product data for each drop.​
​
Minimum Bend Radius
  • In order to prevent kinking, the UL Listing and/or FM Approval process dictates a minimum bend radius. This is listed in the manufacturer's product data.
  • It's important to also verify minimum bend radius for field inspections so that the install does not violate the manufacturer's listing.

Bending Near Mounting Nut
  • Some manufacturers require a minimum distance before a bend is allowed at the nut near the mounting bracket. This distance varies across manufacturers (we'll explore more next week) and is available in the product data.
  • Some manufacturer's combat this limitation by providing a 90 degree elbow immediately at the reducing fitting near the mounting bracket, which offers flexibility in the hose direction directly above the sprinkler.
Flexible Sprinkler Drop
Flexible Drops have limitations on minimum bend radius, the maximum number of bends allowed, and bending near the mounting nut
Hanging
  • Flexible sprinkler hose fittings exceeding 6 feet in length are required to use a hanger attached to structure (NFPA 13 2016 Section 9.2.1.3.3.3, which was added in the 2016 edition)
​
Pressure Loss
  • We'll see this in more detail next week, but pressure loss within the flexible hoses have significant hydraulic impact, and vary widely across different products. 
  • Pressure loss needs to be incorporated in the hydraulic calculations.

Types
Braided
  • Braided hose is defined by the external braiding which wraps and protects the interior corrugated hose.
  • This arrangement better retains internal water pressure and prevents deformation of the hose, prevents overbending of the flexible hose, and ends up being more flexible (workable) than non-braided hose
  • Braided type is required by FM 1637 Standard. This approval process requires 50,000 cycle tests (under ISO 10380)
Non-Braided
  • Corrugated hose only
  • Can be prone to extension (corrugations can pop-out)
  • Can be prone to kinking
  • Can be very stiff (only tested to 100 cycles under UL test)

Subscribe
  • Next week I'll briefly dive into the currently available products developed by leaders in the U.S. marketplace.

Want to see more like this? Subscribe to our Blog.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Flexible Sprinkler Drops

8/17/2016

 
While not a code requirement, flexible sprinkler drops have quickly become a major innovation for the fire sprinkler industry. This week's post explores logistical advantages and drawbacks of the technology.

​Components
Flexible Sprinkler Drop
Components of a Flexible Sprinkler Drop Assembly
Advantages
​

Reduced labor cost
  • Flexible sprinkler drops can significantly reduce the time to installation. A single return bend on branch piping can be composed of at least seven distinct pieces which include some that must be cut and joined. A flexible sprinkler drop does not require the assembly nor coordination required to locate in specific positions within a ceiling.
Faster project completion
  • Time savings can lead to an overall faster-completed project.
Allows for ceiling/lid movement over time 
  • Lowering of a ceiling or hard lid can occur over time due to settling, loads placed on the ceiling, or even activity above the ceiling (such as workers above a cooler/freezer). This difference in ceiling position for hard piped sprinklers can cause unwanted obstructions between the new ceiling position and the fixed-in-place sprinkler. Flexible drops allow the sprinkler to move with the ceiling.
Flexible Sprinkler Drop Ceiling Movement
Flexible sprinkler drops allow the sprinkler to stay in the appropriate position with ceiling movement or following seismic events
Seismic performance
  • In a seismic event, sprinklers on flexible drops can continue to provide protection below a ceiling
Does not require oversized escutcheon 
  • Unless a ceiling is rigidly braced, sprinklers must be allowed 1/4 inch clearance on all sides in buildings with Seismic Category C (ASCE 7 Section 9.6.2.6.2.1) or 1 inch of free movement in all horizontal directions in buildings with Seismic Design Category D, E, and F (ASCE 7 Section 9.6.2.6.2.2(e)).
  • This requirement necessitates either (1) an oversized escutcheon to cover the required clearance (which may not exactly enamor your architect), (2) a swing joint above the sprinkler, or (3) a flexible drop. While each solution meets code, flexible drops can accommodate the required movement without oversized escutcheons (NFPA 13 2016 9.3.4.11.1).
Oversized Sprinkler Escutcheon
For facilities with Seismic Design Category D, E, or F, movement must be allowed between a sprinkler and its surroundings. Oversized escutcheons are one method to allow the movement but conceal the surrounding gap.
Remodel friendly
  • Use of flexible sprinkler assemblies allow easy relocation of sprinklers within a short distance with ceiling modifications without re-cutting, attachment or demolition of existing pipe and fittings.

​Disadvantages

Material Cost
  • A flexible armover assembly can run $160-$400 per assembly, while traditional pipe and fittings can run half that cost or less on materials.
Hydraulic Demand
  • As we'll explore in next week's post, the hydraulic demand can be dramatically more significant than a return bend, adding the equivalent of up to 100 feet of 1-inch schedule 40 piping in friction loss.
​
​What is your experience?
Join the conversation and discuss what you see as advantages or disadvantages of flexible sprinkler assemblies for this post at www.meyerfire.com.

​Subscribe
Next week I'll explore points to consider with flexible sprinkler drops in design and inspection that I've come across in my research.

Want to see more like this? Subscribe to our Blog.

Slope Requirements for Fire Sprinkler Pipe

8/10/2016

 
Pipe slope is a critical element in reducing water collection following a sprinkler system drain. Water removal is important in that the largest detriment to sprinkler system life, corrosion, occurs across interfaces between air and water. Here is a quick summary of the minimum pipe slope requirements for fire sprinkler systems.
Picture
 
Non-Refrigerated
Refrigerated
Wet Systems
Branch & Main Pipe: Level

​
(NFPA 13 2002 8.15.2.2.1, 2007/2010/2013/2016 8.16.2.2.1)

N/A
Dry Systems
Mains: 1/4 inch per 10 feet
Branches: 1/2 inch per 10 feet
​

(NFPA 13 2002 8.15.2.3.1, 2007/2010/2013/2016 8.16.2.3.1)
Branches & Mains:
​1/2 inch per 10 feet


(NFPA 13 2002 8.15.2.3.4, 2007/2010/2013/2016 8.16.2.3.3)
Pre-Action Systems
Mains: 1/4 inch per 10 feet
Branches: 1/2 inch per 10 feet
​

(NFPA 13 2002 Edition does not require slope for pre-action systems in non-freezing areas per 8.15.2.3.3, 2007/2010/2013/2016 does require slope per 8.16.2.3.2)
Branches & Mains:
​1/2 inch per 10 feet
​

(NFPA 13 2002 8.15.2.3.4, 2007/2010/2013/2016 8.16.2.3.3)

Advantages of Return Bends in Fire Sprinkler Systems

8/3/2016

 
Components of a Return Bend
A return bend is the piping arrangement for pendent sprinklers where piping stems from the top of the branch pipe (riser nipple), runs horizontally (arm over), and then down to the sprinkler (drop).
Fire Sprinkler Return Bend
Components of a return bend in a fire sprinkler system
Where Required
Raw Water Sources, Mill Ponds, Open-Top Reservoirs
  • Required to avoid sediment and mineral deposit accumulation (NFPA 13 2002 Edition Section 8.14.18.1, 2007/2010 8.15.18.1, 2013/2016 8.15.19.1)
Dry Systems
  • Although in theory return bends would trap air and prevent water from traveling to a pendent sprinkler, in practice many installers have found water trapped at pendent sprinklers in dry systems even when on return bends. This is in part why return bends on dry systems as well as sprinklers are required to be located in heated areas. (NFPA 13 2002 7.4.1.4, 2007/2010/2013/2016 7.3.2.5)

Where Not Required
Deluge Systems
  • Deluge systems already provide an open orifice, so sediment accumulation to the extent that the system would be plugged is typically not a concern. (NFPA 13 2002 8.14.18.3, 2007/2010 8.15.18.3, 2013/2016 8.15.19.3)
Where Dry Pendent Sprinklers Are Used
  • Sediment accumulation may be less of an issue at the sprinkler, but could still be a concern at the edge of the dry shaft. (NFPA 13 2002 8.14.18.4, 2007/2010 8.15.18.4, 2013/2016 8.15.19.4)
Wet Pipe Where K-Factors are 11.2 or greater
  • In theory large orifices would be more difficult for accumulation of sediment to block. (NFPA 13 2013/2016 8.15.19.5)
Fire Sprinkler Return Bend
Return bends are used primarily to prevent sediment accumulation in the drop to the sprinkler.
So Why Use Return Bends?
1. Sediment Accumulation
  • Prevent mineral deposit, pipe scale, and sediment accumulation (NFPA 13 2002 8.14.18.2, 2007/2010 8.15.18.2, 2013/2016 8.15.19.2)
2. Sprinkler Installation Flexibility
  • By piping from the top of the branch pipe instead of the side, sprinklers have the flexibility to be located at the center of tile or a specific location with greater tolerance for the sprinkler installer
3. Remodel and Shell Friendly
  • Where shell spaces are provided with upright sprinklers, return bends can typically be installed without modifying the branch piping
  • When systems undergo remodels, taping the top of the branch piping allows for flexibility in future sprinkler placement.
Fire Sprinkler Return Bend
Use of return bends on outlets at the top of branch pipe makes relocation and exact-location placement easier for installers.
Things to Consider
Hangers
  • Hangers are required to prevent upward movement on the arm over piping when:
    • the arm over is steel, exceeds 12 inches, and system pressure exceeds 100 psi (NFPA 13 2002/2007/2010/2013/2016 9.2.3.5.2)
    • the arm over is steel and exceeds 24 inches (NFPA 13 2002/2007/2010/2013/2016 9.2.3.5)
Minimum Outlet Dimension
  • New systems require outlets to be minimum 1-inch, but can have temporary bushings serving upright sprinklers (NFPA 13 2002 8.14.19.1, 2007/2010 8.15.19.1, 2013/2016 8.15.20.1)
Minimum Riser Dimension on Existing Systems
  • For hydraulically designed systems, nipples less than 1 inch are allowed but cannot exceed 4 inches in length, and must be incorporated in hydraulic calculations (NFPA 13 2002 8.14.19.4, 2007/2010 8.15.19.5, 2013/2016 8.15.20.5)
  • For pipe schedule systems, nipples less than 1 inch are allowed but also cannot exceed 4 inches in length (NFPA 13 2002 8.14.19.3, 2007/2010 8.15.19.4, 2013/2016 8.15.20.4)

Interested in More?
Subscribe to our Blog if you haven't already.

Further Reading

Minnesota Public safety Issue | Link
NFPA 13 | Link

A New Look

8/2/2016

 
I'd like to open the blog today with a different flavor of technical information alongside visuals which I hope you enjoy. Early in my career I realized that the value an engineer has is in the knowledge he or she gains and can then convey in order to help others.

Traditional thinking is that experience is the only way to gain knowledge and build value. While that may be true in large part, those who wish to learn without compromise naturally have more to gain and more to offer others. In this blog I hope to note takeaways I've gathered and topics which I hope to explore in more detail as part of my effort to be a relentless learner. It is my way of cementing details I've explored while garnering feedback and learning from knowledge of others.

If you have not already subscribed, you can do so by visiting the Blog and simply entering your email on the right hand side. Thanks for being a part of the journey. ​
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    SUBSCRIBE

    Get Free Articles via Email:
    + Get calculators, tools, resources and articles
    + Get our PDF Flowchart for Canopy & Overhang Requirements instantly
    Picture
    + No spam
    ​+ Unsubscribe anytime
    I'm Interested In:

    AUTHOR

    Joe Meyer, PE, is a Fire Protection Engineer out of St. Louis, Missouri who writes & develops resources for Fire Protection Professionals. See bio here: About


    FILTERS

    All
    Announcements
    Book Review
    Calculators
    Career
    Course
    Delegated Design
    Design Challenge
    Detail Critique
    Fire Alarm
    Fire Events
    Fire Suppression
    Flammable & Combustible Liquids
    Flexible Drops
    Floor Control Valve
    Life Safety
    News
    NICET
    Passive Fire Protection
    PE Exam
    Pick A Part
    Pick-A-Part
    Products
    Site Updates
    Special Hazards
    Specifications
    Sprinkler Systems
    Standpipes
    Tools
    Videos


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT