When conducting or reviewing hydraulic calculations, I very often face scenarios where the initial (very first) hydraulic demand exceeds the potential for the water supply.
At that point I lose all hope and add a fire pump to the job. Just kidding, of course  there's at least a half dozen hydraulic elements I analyze and refine to better match the capabilities of the water supply to the design of the sprinkler system. Refining Hydraulic Calculations with KFactors One of the more finetooth aspects I look at is the kfactor used on the sprinklers. The kfactor for a fire sprinkler is the discharge coefficient, or in normal human terms just relates to the amount of water that is permitted through the sprinkler. The kfactor is dependent upon the orifice diameter of the sprinkler  a low kfactor (such as K2.8) restricts the flow of water, while a larger kfactor (such as K22.4, K25.2, or K28.0) permit much more water to flow through. Kfactors were originally created to be multiples of the discharge of a K5.6 sprinkler. A K2.8 sprinkler, for example, is 50% discharge of a K5.6 sprinkler, while a K11.2 sprinkler is 200% of the discharge of a K5.6. NFPA 132016 Table 6.2.3.1 shows this well.
Use In Design
We find K5.6 sprinklers in light hazard all the time. Residential sprinklers often have kfactors less than 5.6. ESFR and CMSA require minimum K11.2 (NFPA 132016 6.2.3.5). ESFR are tied directly to the hazard it protects. Back to refining the hydraulics in a system  increasing the kfactor of a sprinkler allows more water to flow through a sprinkler with less pressure loss. This becomes very important when trying to reduce pressure loss in a system. Light Hazard Example A light hazard system (0.10 gpm/sqft) with widely spaced sprinklers (at 225 sqft each) would require a minimum flow through each sprinkler of 22.5 gpm (0.10 gpm/sqft x 225 sqft = 22.5 gpm). In order to flow 22.5 gpm, a sprinkler with a kfactor of 5.6 now requires 16.1 psi to do so (Q=k√p, or rearranged, p=(Q/k)^2). This is 9.1 psi higher than 7 psi, or the minimum that NFPA 13 requires. In order to flow 22.5 gpm, a sprinkler with kfactor of 8.0 only requires 7.9 psi to do so, or less than 1 psi more than the minimum NFPA 13 requires. In this scenario, flowing the same amount of water (22.5 gpm) results in a 8.2 psi difference in the pressure required at the most remote sprinkler. Can 8.2 psi be important? Absolutely! Other Scenarios Similarly, consider Ordinary Hazard Group 1 (0.15 gpm/sqft) and Ordinary Hazard Group 2 (0.20 gpm/sqft) systems. For Ordinary Hazard Group 1 and sprinklers spaced at 130 sqft, a K8.0 sprinkler requires 5.1 psi less than a K5.6 sprinkler (7.0 psi vs 12.1 psi). This same methodology applies to extended coverage sprinkler requirements, specific densities for traditional storage design, and more. The KFactor Selector Want to quickly compare fire sprinkler kfactors across different design densities and sprinkler spacing? Easy. Here's the calculator I've created that quickly compares pressure requirements and flow rates across different sprinkler kfactors. Toolkit Update Want all these tools in a downloadable, printable & PDFsaving capability? Great! The MeyerFire Toolkit will include this tool as well. You can download and try it out now through September for free. Sprinkler Database Other than the Toolkit, users of the comprehensive Fire Sprinkler Database can sort & search among kfactors as one of the parameters when comparing sprinklers. Please Share Do you get these articles & tools? If not, follow the fight for better fire protection by subscribing here. Know someone that might be interested in these tools or articles? Please do me a favor and send them a link or email to share these resources. Thanks!
Gerard Crimmins
4/5/2019 10:08:51 pm
I was reviewing a sprinkler plan using flexible house from an arm over. The head had a k factor of 5.6 and the flexible hose had a k factor of 4.86 with the pressure and flow at the head. This seems like a mistake. Wouldn't you want a flexible hose with a k factor of 5.6 or larger?
MODERATOR
7/24/2019 07:01:54 am
Gerard  this was just posted as a daily question here: https://www.meyerfire.com/daily/flexibledropwithsmallerkfactor
Silvano Tongco
3/27/2020 02:20:47 am
just for studying
Nestor Antonio Gomez Rivera
4/26/2020 10:52:29 pm
So, it will be ok to install K=5.6 sprinklers 4 meters away from each other in a 2.50 mts tall ceiling?
Joe Meyer
4/27/2020 07:53:48 am
The kfactor is relatively unrelated to your question. Sprinkler spacing is more complex than just the distance between sprinklers and the ceiling height. It depends on the type of sprinkler, listing limitations for the sprinkler, and the hazard category of the space it's protecting (among other things). Best place to go is NFPA 13 if you're protecting your building in accordance with that standard.
Giri
7/3/2020 05:30:48 am
Hi, 7/21/2020 03:00:07 pm
Very Nicely designed calculator for Sprinkler Design Calculations Comments are closed.

SubscribeGet Free Articles via Email:
+ Get calculators, tools, resources and articles
+ Get our PDF Flowchart for Canopy & Overhang Requirements instantly + No spam
+ Unsubscribe anytime The ToolkitGet access to every tool, the downloadable Toolkit, Sprinkler Database, Calculators and more:
AuthorJoseph Meyer, PE, owns/operates his own Fire Protection Engineering practice in St. Louis, Missouri. See bio on About page. Categories
All
Archives
August 2020
