Consider a high-piled rack storage area with 30 ft roof height and the following arrangements:
(A) Class I through IV and cartoned nonexpanded Group A plastic up to full rack height (B) Exposed nonexpanded Group A plastics, only up to five feet NFPA 13 Table 23.3.1 prescribes protection criteria for (A) as pendent K25.2 at 15 psi starting pressure; however, it does not provide protection criteria for exposed nonexpanded Group A plastics using K25.2 sprinklers where ceiling height is ≤ 30 ft. NFPA 13 Table 4.3.1.7.1.1 prescribes protection criteria for (B) as Ordinary Hazard Group 2. The owner will have exposed nonexpanded Group A plastics. They have agreed in writing to maintain exposed nonexpanded Group A plastic to the bottom five feet of the racks. Would storing exposed nonexpanded Group A plastics only in the lowest five feet of the rack, with Class I-IV above to the full rack height, be permissible? If so, the overhead sprinkler design under NFPA 13-2022 § 20.4.13.2 would only require the more-demanding of the two criteria (which is A), correct? Some have suggested that the presence of the exposed nonexpanded Group A plastic within the (A) criteria mixes with the (B) criteria to form a more hazardous condition than posed by either individual commodity / arrangement. However, NFPA 13 § 20.4.13.1 and 20.4.13.2 seem to require each commodity / arrangement to be considered independently and not to hypothesize protection requirements based on commodity / arrangement mixes. Long one, but thanks in advance. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Pete H
4/29/2024 07:03:25 am
Check out NFPA 13 (2022 edition) Table 4.3.1.7.1.1
Reply
Glenn Berger
4/29/2024 08:08:43 am
Administrative control of storage arrangement / commodity is commonplace. Failure to comply with this approved administrative control is also commonplace.
Reply
NK
4/29/2024 08:18:00 am
You cannot store a higher commodity below a lower commodity in racks without solid horizontal barriers. NFPA 13, 2016 §5.6.1.2 "Mixed Commodities" and §5.6.1.2.4 "Mixed Commodity Segregation" provide guidance on when you can and cannot mix commodities. Generally speaking, you can't mix commodities without using solid barriers and in-rack sprinklers. The handbook right below 5.6.1.2.4 specifically states that FM Global testing found that placing Group A plastics below class III commodities resulted in the need for Group A plastic protection.
Reply
Franck
4/29/2024 09:17:24 am
As indicated by Glenn, it is nice to have rules, but most of the time, rules are not considered on the long term.
Reply
4/29/2024 09:18:56 am
Unfortunately, the proposed scenario is not compliant without horizontal barriers, in-rack sprinklers as mentioned in other replies, or some other engineered solution. Assuming this is under the 2021 International Fire Code, §3204 and §3206.3 prevent this arrangement. The way I explain it to my clients is to consider the plastics on bottom as the burner underneath their stovetop grate. The plastics turn the dial to high-heat instead of medium heat. It is added fuel that otherwise would not be there.
Reply
Streeter
4/29/2024 10:07:43 am
We have done some storage arrangements similar to this and have found that is this scenario, the use of ESFRs is almost always going to be a hydraulically less demanding system than an OH2 system.
Reply
Jon
4/29/2024 01:22:17 pm
Glenn's comments are spot on. As a former AHJ with 37 years of experience as a fire marshal, I have rarely seen compliance with "promises". "I promise not to let more than 49 people into my business with one exit - until I have a sale." "I promise not to store more than 12 feet high so it is not high-piled storage - until I figure out that I have a large volume of space that I could use." "I promise not to use my large assembly venue for concerts - until I find that I can make a lot of money even though I chose not to sprinkler it."
Reply
Brandon Wilkerson
4/29/2024 01:59:05 pm
To those stating that this is not allowed because higher hazard commodities cannot be stored within a rack without designing to the high hazard commodity, regardless of the storage arrangement:
Reply
NK
4/30/2024 08:11:04 am
"highest classified commodity AND storage arrangement" refers to the most demanding commodity and the most demanding arrangement. For example, if you have class IV commodities and cartoned expanded group a plastics in a rack then you would protect the rack for the cartoned expanded group a plastics since it is more demanding. Like wise, if you have a warehouse with single-row racks and multiple-row racks you would protect the warehouse for multiple-row racks since it is more demanding.
Reply
Pete D.
4/30/2024 08:27:10 pm
This kind of goes along with what others were saying regarding mixes commodities and rack barriers. When you get into NFPA 13 sections /tables on ceiling-only protection of group A plastics in racks, it gives a 0.6 density, but it also comes with a 10 ft maximum clearance between the storage and roof. That is if youre storing 15 ft in a 30 ft building, you must protect as though you're atoeing at 20 ft. This is echoed in the General Storage requirements (used to be Ch. 12), and it's all throughout FM's design criteria, NFPA 13 tire storage, etc. I've installed a single line of in-rack sprinklers with a horizontal barrier in the past to protect class III combustible liquid IBCs in the lowest tier. Think of the horizontal barrier as a way of bringing the ceiling to the storage instead of vice versa.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop April '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
May 2024
PE PREP SERIES |