MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT

2017 PE PREP GUIDE

ERRATA & UPDATES
Every attempt is made for accuracy in every portion of the guide. It pains me to find mistakes, but I post them here in an effort for complete clarity and most importantly to aid in better exam prep.

I greatly appreciate any and all feedback from users in improving this guide. All of these updates are incorporated for future editions.

2017 PE Prep Guide Errata
​

Versions 1.01 through 1.05 (version number noted on backside of first inside page):
Formula 2.6, 2.7: Title for 2.6 should read "Lower Flam. Limit - Other Pressures". LFL for 2.6 is lower flammability limit "at any pressure". Title for 2.7 should read "Lower Flam. Limit - Normal Atm. Pressure".
Formulas 2.12, 2.13: Compartment mass ventilation rate should be in kg/s, not cu. m/s. Per SFPE (5th) p1007, cubic m/s x 1.18 kg/cu. m = kg/s.
Formula 9.10: Sp.G. is specific gravity of "liquid", not "gas".
Question 21: Mass ventilation rate should be in kg/s, not cu. m/s. Per SFPE (5th) p1007, cubic m/s x 1.18 kg/cu. m = kg/s. Answer is still c, but at 335 K.
Question 32: Assumed radiative fraction is listed at 25% but noted as assumed at 35%. 35% is more appropriate, resulting in a radiant flux of 2.4 kW/sqm.
Question 77: The T.T. Lie Equation (from SFPE 4th p4-350) was removed from SFPE (5th) Edition, so this question could not be used on the 2017 Exam.
Question 106: Solution should round to 500 gpm for flows above 2,500 gpm (per FPH 15-25). Solution becomes 3,000 gpm.
Question 109: The quick-reference charts from the SFPE 4th Edition were pulled from the 5th. C-factor should be given. See new problem and solution.
Question 113: Solution should read 50 occupants. See full solution.
Questions 126, 143, 147, & 151: The solution does not match the original question. Solutions: 126, 143, 147, 151.

Versions 1.01 through 1.04 only:
Formulas 5.18-5.21: References should be to page 13-377 and section A.10.6.2, not 13-339 and A.10.8.2.
​
​Question 49: Thrust block should be calculated using the Outside Diameter (4.5 in), not the nominal diameter. Answer becomes 3,936 lbs.
Question 101: The solution does not match the original question. See full solution.

Versions 1.01 through 1.03 only:
Question 5: The probability tree is here: probability tree.
Question 66: The question should read "Which of the following do not indicate deterioration of a battery?"
Question 70: The answer should be 10.2 square meters (b), not 12.2 square meters (c). The solution units should also be "kg/s".

Versions 1.01 and 1.02 only:
Question 56: The specific volume of the agent was calculated for HFC-125, not HFC-227ea. See updated solution.​
Question 57: The specific gravity shown is irrelevant to the problem (it does not affect the solution).
Question 110: The agent's specific volume was calculated for HFC-125, not HFC-227ea. See updated solution.
Question 121: The worked portion of the ELADJ shows use of a 6-inch pipe, which should be 2.469. The solution is still correct.
Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT