|
Is it necessary to apply special sprinkler design criteria for a membrane building?
Tension fabric buildings with polyethylene membrane are becoming increasingly common. In this case, the fabric is rated per NFPA 701 and other certs, so it will not propagate fire, but the manufacturer advertises that it will melt/burn under direct flame and release smoke and heat. Would this not affect the operation of the building's sprinkler system? FM 1-59 requires quick response sprinklers, which makes a lot of sense, but provides little to no evidence in support. I can see no similar requirements in NFPA outside special requirements for aircraft hangars; NFPA 102 seems like the main standard and is silent on the subject. Is there something I'm missing in NFPA? Is there any research out there on sprinkler performance in membrane structures that will melt and release heat? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
Pete H
12/1/2025 07:03:58 am
https://hybridbuildingsolutions.com/fabric-buildings-protect-against-fire-damage/#:~:text=There%20are%20many%20benefits%20to,of%20Brutus%20Salt%20Storage%20Building
Reply
12/1/2025 07:58:02 am
Other than area increases for slope, hanging methods for the atypical structural members, seismic considerations for structural load, and restraint methods, the layouts and design approaches are not any different....
Reply
Jesse
12/1/2025 08:10:37 am
Agree with Dan and Pete here. The point at which the membrane deteriorates is above even intermediate temperature sprinklers. Using QR sprinklers I would think would allow the AS system to operate.
Reply
Chad
12/1/2025 08:19:14 am
What kind of "evidence" do you need? Section 3.4 of 1-59 applies common sense "evidence" that speaks the inherent, expected conditions as to the why:
Reply
Nick (OP)
12/1/2025 07:49:20 pm
Thanks! The challenge in this particular case is that the QR sprinkler requirement is in conflict with other requirements, because this is a dry system for an EH1 occupancy (which both FM and NFPA agree should have SR heads). Even if there is no "proper" way to do it according to standard and may be unprotectable, I'm struggling with what the "best effort" solution should be.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
12/1/2025 08:22:12 am
The scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2024) determines WHERE an automatic sprinkler system (ASPS) is required based on the structure’s Occupancy Classification (903.2.1-903.2.10) and Specific Building Areas and Hazards (903.2.11).
Reply
WC
12/1/2025 08:46:57 am
I agree with Chad. I do not agree with Pete H, Dan Wilder, Jesse and not sure where Todd E Wyatt was going with their response as this is a question about functionality and not design.
Reply
Franck
12/1/2025 03:54:26 pm
I fully agree with this comment
Reply
Nick (OP)
12/1/2025 07:55:58 pm
Thank you for the reply. I am somewhat of the same "no adequate option" opinion, especially since it's going to need a dry system for an EH1 occupancy. The building still needs to be sprinklered per the AHJ so some kind of system will be going in, it's just hard to choose what would be the "least bad" option.
Reply
Jack G
12/1/2025 12:12:30 pm
My experiences with fabric structures was with 6 flags Great Adventure and Factory Mutual Engineering. Also Hotel structures , Sheraton for displays, conventions, heated and cooled tents and FM.
Reply
Jack G
12/1/2025 12:20:58 pm
The pipe was in the trusses to protect the sprinklers. Some runs we bent to the arch, others with angled fittings. Bulk to the “ lines “ was run low along peremeter around 15 or more feet high.
Reply
Nick (OP)
12/1/2025 07:51:58 pm
Thanks Jack, fascinating projects and insightful! I appreciate the reply.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop April '26 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
April 2026
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
