MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Will Membrane Building Melt Before Sprinkler?

12/1/2025

12 Comments

 
Is it necessary to apply special sprinkler design criteria for a membrane building?

Tension fabric buildings with polyethylene membrane are becoming increasingly common. In this case, the fabric is rated per NFPA 701 and other certs, so it will not propagate fire, but the manufacturer advertises that it will melt/burn under direct flame and release smoke and heat.

Would this not affect the operation of the building's sprinkler system?

FM 1-59 requires quick response sprinklers, which makes a lot of sense, but provides little to no evidence in support.

I can see no similar requirements in NFPA outside special requirements for aircraft hangars; NFPA 102 seems like the main standard and is silent on the subject.

Is there something I'm missing in NFPA? Is there any research out there on sprinkler performance in membrane structures that will melt and release heat?
​

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
12 Comments
Pete H
12/1/2025 07:03:58 am

https://hybridbuildingsolutions.com/fabric-buildings-protect-against-fire-damage/#:~:text=There%20are%20many%20benefits%20to,of%20Brutus%20Salt%20Storage%20Building

Yes, a melting membrane would affect the building's sprinkler system insofar as "Without heat collection, the sprinkler will not operate." However, one would assume the point of melting the fabric membrane to prevent the spread of fire (for most of these fabrics seems to start at 329 F as the lowest) will still be higher than the 125-286 degree (Fahrenheit) temperatures the sprinklers should already have activated at.

Reply
Dan Wilder link
12/1/2025 07:58:02 am

Other than area increases for slope, hanging methods for the atypical structural members, seismic considerations for structural load, and restraint methods, the layouts and design approaches are not any different....

And as Pete said for the heat collection. Most membrane MFG's (or their suppliers) have testing reports available when requested.

https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/626d7c3bdc441c114f39f304/65e138028f977434c4f9fcd3_NFPA%20701-2023%20Test%20Results.pdf

https://abastran.com/en/fire-resistance-of-membrane-structures-pvc-ptfe-etfe/

Reply
Jesse
12/1/2025 08:10:37 am

Agree with Dan and Pete here. The point at which the membrane deteriorates is above even intermediate temperature sprinklers. Using QR sprinklers I would think would allow the AS system to operate.

Reply
Chad
12/1/2025 08:19:14 am

What kind of "evidence" do you need? Section 3.4 of 1-59 applies common sense "evidence" that speaks the inherent, expected conditions as to the why:


3.4 Protection
Fire-exposed fabric structures can impair automatic sprinkler systems or present conditions which are difficult
to protect. Therefore, they are not appropriate for all occupancies.
Fabric materials that are exposed to fire can fail (lose integrity, melt, or burn through) and create holes or
openings in the building envelope or ceiling that allow heat (hot gas) to vent. Automatic sprinklers rely on heat
from fire exposure for proper actuation, and therefore venting can delay sprinkler response and result in
inadequate protection. This is among the fire-related hazards addressed by the recommendations in Section 2.4.

For a two-layered system (e.g., an acoustical interior fabric liner in addition to the exterior fabric), the fabric
liner typically acts as the ceiling when designing or evaluating automatic sprinkler protection. In addition to
overwhelming the sprinkler system, two-layered systems can create a concealed space that may require
additional automatic sprinkler protection.
Fabric structures often have substantial roof slopes or curvature in order to shed rain and snow, or for
architectural or occupational purposes. These large slopes often exceed the maximum recommended slopes
for some automatic sprinkler systems.
Fabric structures can be susceptible to fire damage from exterior sources since the fabric material can burn
or melt away and expose building contents.
It may not be feasible to install automatic sprinkler protection in tensioned fabric structures due to the lack
of adequate support structure, which is needed for the proper hanging, bracing, and restraint of automatic
sprinkler system components.

Reply
Nick (OP)
12/1/2025 07:49:20 pm

Thanks! The challenge in this particular case is that the QR sprinkler requirement is in conflict with other requirements, because this is a dry system for an EH1 occupancy (which both FM and NFPA agree should have SR heads). Even if there is no "proper" way to do it according to standard and may be unprotectable, I'm struggling with what the "best effort" solution should be.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
12/1/2025 08:22:12 am

The scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2024) determines WHERE an automatic sprinkler system (ASPS) is required based on the structure’s Occupancy Classification (903.2.1-903.2.10) and Specific Building Areas and Hazards (903.2.11).

Once the Occupancy Classification(s) are determined, then the permitted ASPS standard (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) is determined. The required ASPS standard determines the sprinkler design criteria.

REFERENCES
IBC-2024
Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems
Section 903 Automatic Sprinkler Systems
903.2 Where Required
903.2.1 Group A
903.2.2 Group B
903.2.3 Group E
903.2.4 Group F-1
903.2.5 Group H
903.2.6 Group I
903.2.7 Group M
903.2.8 Group R
903.2.9 Group S-1
903.2.10 Group S-2 Parking Garages
903.2.11 Specific Building Areas and Hazards

Reply
WC
12/1/2025 08:46:57 am

I agree with Chad. I do not agree with Pete H, Dan Wilder, Jesse and not sure where Todd E Wyatt was going with their response as this is a question about functionality and not design.

Just because a fabric is rated slightly above a sprinkler rating does not mean the sprinkler will operate before the fabric fails. Please refer to the many fire tests where ceiling temperature are measured at much higher temperatures (>500F) than the sprinkler rating before the sprinkler operates.

IMO, there is no protection scheme that will adequately protect fabric structures outside of a deluge system with some type of reliable detection system and usually the size of the structure eliminates this as a practical option.

Reply
Franck
12/1/2025 03:54:26 pm

I fully agree with this comment
I see too many possibilities for the sprinkler system not to operate properly, unless you have some kind of reinforced material with a much higher temperature melting point (as outlined by Jack below).

Reply
Nick (OP)
12/1/2025 07:55:58 pm

Thank you for the reply. I am somewhat of the same "no adequate option" opinion, especially since it's going to need a dry system for an EH1 occupancy. The building still needs to be sprinklered per the AHJ so some kind of system will be going in, it's just hard to choose what would be the "least bad" option.

I feel like others must have faced this dilemma too given that these tents are used by auto manufacturers and all sorts of industries these days.

Reply
Jack G
12/1/2025 12:12:30 pm

My experiences with fabric structures was with 6 flags Great Adventure and Factory Mutual Engineering. Also Hotel structures , Sheraton for displays, conventions, heated and cooled tents and FM.
The structures there were, both companies were Kevlar. From what I can recall was the fabric was reinforced Kevlar for strength and was rated for over 900 degrees F.
Fm has a guideline for these structures. Also IBC 2021….3103.5..:
The great flag structures were huge ( like Oktoberfest tent ) had triangular pipe trusses about every 30 feet. The tent itself had sag in between.
FM proposed Sidewall sprinklers back to back with baffles in the truss. One sprinkler would hit the “ middle of the sag.
Before contracting, fm did extensive testing for this method.
Fabric ceilings I ve dealt with usually had pendent heads in them ( indoors )

Reply
Jack G
12/1/2025 12:20:58 pm

The pipe was in the trusses to protect the sprinklers. Some runs we bent to the arch, others with angled fittings. Bulk to the “ lines “ was run low along peremeter around 15 or more feet high.
For the Sheraton, the structures were erected and removed seasonally. So we put fabrication tads on all the pipe so it would be like a new install. Pipe would be scrutinized and repared as needed.
Was really interesting.

Reply
Nick (OP)
12/1/2025 07:51:58 pm

Thanks Jack, fascinating projects and insightful! I appreciate the reply.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT