MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Why Low Pressure at 150% Test for Fire Pump?

1/18/2022

16 Comments

 
Hello everyone -

I have a problem with two identical fire pumps rated at 145 psi at 2,500 gpm.

When testing for 0% flow and 100% flow the pump gives the correct pressure, but, when testing 150% flow the pressure drops dramatically, it has to show 125 psi and the result is 92 psi.

The pumps has a 10-inch flange suction an as NFPA allows it was installed a 10-inch pipe directly to the pipe, no suction reducer, having 16-ft (5 m) long of distance for one pump and 19'-6" (6 m) for another one, the second one with two 45-degree elbows installed more than 10 times the diameter from pump suction.

The tank is 23-ft (7 m), full of water. The test outlet is installed on the other side of the tank, so the flow does not fall over the suction inlets. The antivortex inlet has a plate of 7.5 inches above the floor.

The pump discharge is 10 inch.

The flow meter is 8-inch diameter with 8 diameters before and more than 5 diameters after.

Any idea why the pressure at 150% is so low?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
16 Comments
Mike L
1/18/2022 07:11:29 am

We would need to get a full description on how the whole arrangement is piped up. Are the pumps piped in parallel or in series?

But, my gut reaction is that your supply piping is too small for the 150% flow. At 150%, the flow rate is 3,750 gpm.

Using Hazen-Williams formula, assuming 8" schedule 40 steel piping, the friction loss at 3,750 gpm is double what it is at 2,500 gpm.

Reply
Mourad
8/29/2022 05:51:54 am

I will highly appreciate if we can debate why 150% is required for centrifugal fire pumps if 100% is achieved
The question may looks strange however I need some clarifications about it

Reply
Dan Wilder
1/18/2022 07:21:32 am

Need to get the icosahedron of trouble shooting out....

Are these in series or parallel?

Do these results match the certified pump curve from the factory or previous test results (new vs existing)?

What does the suction pressure drop to?

Are both pumps performing the same or is it only one pump with issues?

Electric or Diesel? Are there any large changes in the volts/amps or RPM's at the testing points? Verify incoming wire sizes & connection points are secure (this typically shows up more on startup but just a check)

Are these results at an actual flow condition (with pitot) or through the flow meter only? Does the setup allow flow through the flow meter to a location that can have a pitot to verify GPM?

Per 20 - 19' Ed - Section 14.2.6.3.4 - As long as you have meet the fire protection demand (and the rating of the pump), you are not required to hit the 150%, but that becomes the new pump curve moving forward for the ITM side.

Factory impeller rating (width/Dia) vs results? Are they consistent.

Just a couple thoughts before the caffeine kicks in....

Reply
Anthony
1/18/2022 07:29:27 am

Had to google icosahedron, not upset.

Reply
Martin Moffitt
1/18/2022 08:18:35 am

Me Too!

Dan Wilder
1/18/2022 08:23:13 am

Always nice to keep things light on the "most productive day of the week"...

Never played the actual game but loved the dice!

Glenn Berger
1/18/2022 08:17:51 am

In addition to the above:

Did the Factory Acceptance Test show the correct pressure at 150% of rated flow?

Reply
Alex
1/18/2022 02:54:11 pm

Million dollar question, Glenn. What did the factory show?

Reply
Paul Pinigis link
1/18/2022 08:22:14 am

We need a bit more information, but my gut reaction is that the suction pipe is too narrow.

Reply
Jesse
1/18/2022 08:33:52 am

I'd be curious to know more about the pump arrangement.

Its possible the suction piping is giving you grief. You're trying to move 3,750-GPM and your fiction loss is significantly more than at rated capacity. I'd be curious to see the results of the factory acceptance test as well as the yearly performance test results to see if anything was trending.

You're not far from where you should be. If you can get at 150% flow at 95-psi you're still within the 65% of rated pressure.

If you can't, as long as you still meet the demand and the pump's rated capacity you're still in good shape. This just becomes the new pump curve.

Reply
Cliff Schulze
1/18/2022 09:06:10 am

I assume you are getting the 125 psi from the factory curve? Otherwise, per NFPA at 150% of rated flow, you need to get 65% of rated pressure, which is 94.25 psi. The 92 psi you are getting is within the 5% variance allowed.

Reply
SCHULMAN
1/18/2022 09:59:43 am

I knew what a 20-sided dice was Dan ,,,
Palladin ... back in the day of course ...

Any chance your supply piping is so poorly manifolded that it is the cause ?

Reply
Franck
1/18/2022 10:03:06 am

10 in. suction pipe is fine and this should not be the problem.
The distance to the tank is not an issue, nor apparently the elbows (the elbows does not create a huge friction loss, but could lead to an early ageing of the pump is installed too close to the suction side).

The issue may come from the rotational speed of your engine (if this is a diesel engine). If this is the case, you can check it by resgistering the rotational speed with a tachometer. Normally, the speed should not vary too much between 0 and 150% (less than 10%). But if your engine has issue, it may be that it perorms well up to 100% and then present issues between 100 and 150% when youi ask the engine to "work a bit more".

For diesel fire pumps, as the rotational speed may vary between the shut off point (0% flow) and overload point 150%), a correction to the rotational speed should be performed to compare the curves over the years and to determine possible degradations on the fire pump.
This is not required for electric fire pumps as the rotational speed is constant.

Values should be corrected according to the following formulas:
• Corrected Flow = Flow measured x (speed nominal / speed measured)
• Corrected Pressure = Net Pressure measured x (speed nominal / speed measured)2

If the problem is not related to the rotational speed, you may have other possible issues such as:
- dirt caught in your flowmeter (if you are using a flowmeter for the test), thus giving artificially wrong results
- wearing of the impeller or a small amount of foreign material caught inside the casing or impeller
- Partial plugging at the intake screen
- Partial blockage in the pump suction pipe (from foreign material, including MIC or zebra mussels, or possibly with a valve that is not fully open on the suction side.
- Reduction of the impeller actual size due to cavitation or corrosion with sediments coming with the water from the tank.

I had once a similar issue and it was a plastic bag that was partially blocking the intake of the pump.

Another possible reason could be the change of the impeller, with a proper diameter, but not wide enough, or with less vanes or a greater angle of vanes.

I would recommend you to first open the pump and check the impeller and casing conditions. If no problem found, then the issue is probably an obstruction upstream.

Reply
Jack G
1/18/2022 04:11:06 pm

Agree with above.
1. Are you share that psi number for 150% was correct. Per NFPA 20 it only has to be 94 psi.
2. Certified gauges? Are gauges giving incorrect readings.
3. suction and discharges pipes seem fine. Nfpa-20 suggests 15 fps for suction 32 fps for discharge,
4. Did you adjust readings for elbow, vortex plate valve in suction. Could be why you got 92 psi instead of 94. If gauges, we’re accurate.
5. Flow meter, vanes clear? If an old flow meter has it been removed and checked internally.
6. Check the setting of the relief valve. Could be opening too early, or leaking. Or blank for the test, if it is leaking, keeping an eye on things.
7. On that note. What is the churn pressure. Sloppy pump will open the relief. ( 140 % allowed by 20)

Reply
Ruben link
2/24/2022 01:46:49 pm

Hello Everyone, thanks for all your recommendations, We are just leaving from the installation, At the end it was an air bubble that made up all the problem.

The flow meter dial was installed looking upwards since is to the waist level, so when the contractor was purging the air from the flow meter it was not correct since the hoses where looking down, and they also didn´t install an air vent as manufacturer recommends

We rotated the flow meters with dial looking down and red hose up, and the miracle happended

Once again, thanks everyone for your recommendations.

Reply
James
9/13/2023 02:36:17 pm

In the event to pressure cannot reach 150% and can only reach a pressure over 108%, is there a requirement on the signage for the pump room? Due to the city water supply the pump cannot reach the 150%, so is there a requirement to show this for future ITM?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT