MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Where are PRV Hose Valves Req'd in a Highrise?

10/30/2024

8 Comments

 
How would you recommend determining when PRV hose valves should be used in a highrise?

I am designing a 12-story hotel. The highest outlet is at 125'-5".

Our flow test is mid-50's static and residual at 1,500 gpm. I did the standpipe calculation using a combined source of the city and fire pump. I sized the pump to what the demand was at 750gpm @ 174.26 psi. In turn I put in a 750gpm @ 125psi fire pump and had a 6.45lb buffer.

Do I then do another calculation to find out the maximum static pressure available on the supply side at each level and minus out the elevation loss?

Can anyone give me a guide on how to find out which level needs a PRV FHV and which doesn't?

​Thank you in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Dan Wilder
10/30/2024 07:39:42 am

I would highly suggest reaching out to the PRV MFG that you plan to use for guidance.

I know AutoSPRINK has a detailed document on the process. Explaining it here will be difficult.

You are on the right track.
-Do the floor calculation to define your needed residual pressure at what flow. Round that up to the next available PRV setting.
-Run a demand calc to determine supply side residual pressure (before PSI reduction)
-Run a supply calc to determine static pressure, at churn, for the fire pump (any floor >175 PSI needs the PRV)
-Use those numbers on the supply side to determine the PRV bonnet setting based on what you need on the residual side for the system.
-Redo the floor calc with the new Static/Residual on the discharge side of the PRV to confirm system is compliant with any safety factors

The Standpipe calc is similar however your need to run it for both a single hose valve flowing (250 GPM), and all 3 hose valves flowing at the same time (assumption being the 750 GPM pump is for 2 standpipes). Verify the bonnet sizing works across both supply side residual pressures giving you the required discharge side residual pressure at 250 GPM.

Watch out for the top mechanical level, many times those systems exceed the max GPM for a PRV FCV and you'll need to switch it out to a pressure reducing station (larger valve).

Reply
Glenn Berger
10/30/2024 08:21:55 am

Per NFPA 14 Paragraph 7.2.3.2 PRVs are required where the pressure exceeds 175 psi.

Based upon information presented, you might need a PRV at the lower floors depending on the fluctuation of the incoming water supply.

Reply
Anthony
10/30/2024 08:23:38 am

A PRV is required any time any pressure is higher than working rated pressure either at static or residual conditions.

For hose valves a PRV hose valve will be required if the static OR residual pressure is over 175 psi. the hose valve should be set as close to 100 psi as possible.

Yes a static calculation needs to be done: churn pressure + static incoming - elevation = static system pressure.

As a general note I'd allow for no less than a 10 psi safety factor on all new high rise pumps. (probably more like 15 psi). You have no idea what the city water pressure will look like in 15 ~25 years especially if this building is located in a developing community.

Reply
Jack G
10/30/2024 08:38:52 am

That was an excellent synopsis by Dan.
The only thing I would add is I use the hose valve manufacturer when picking the settings for the PRV Hose valve for the floor.
When I redo the floor calc with the new static and residual for the floor I try to pick a setting that will put the most water to the floor ( keep the valve as open as possible at the design pressure) as the “safety factor). I also do a supply and demand calc for the floor( and regulate the sizes so the demand calc matches as close as possible to the supply calc—- so the pipe sizes control the flow with as little overages as possible— like calculating a deluge system). ( habit from old days- special hazards)
In my opinion, The supply calc is actually the best model of how the system would work when opening the entire MRA.

Reply
Jack G
10/30/2024 08:52:58 am

I might also add that adding too much safety factor ( putting 10-15 extra psi ) would increase the floor demand so that it would not work— unless you balanced the demand calc to the supply calc. Try it on your next hydraulic exercise.
If you put the safety factor at the pump, you will need extra PRV s when you physically turn the water on. 15 psi might construe to 3 or more floors actually needing prv s . ( exceeding 175 psi static pressure) .

Reply
Anthony
10/30/2024 01:09:37 pm

Try explaining to a building owner why their fire pump is under sized 10 years after its installed, 2 extra floor PRVs are worth the expense.

Reply
Ken Thackery
10/30/2024 10:16:11 am

What is the demand at the roof? That will drive pump size and everything else. You will need PRV for HV and zone controls, possibly high pressure couplings depending on the size/listing.

Reply
Jack G
10/30/2024 11:20:26 am

Agree with Ken also. On government buildings you might find a .15/ 2500 or 3000 sq feet. Probably make one of the standpipes to 6 inch so that the friction loss is reduced. No prv.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT