MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Water Supply Options for Rural Area with Pond?

5/6/2026

13 Comments

 
I am working on a new building in a rural area that will require sprinkler protection. There is no access to a public water supply, only a 30-100 gpm well on site.

Options for fire suppression water include pumping from a large farm pond 150 feet away or installing
a 15,000-gallon water storage tank with a pump.

Any thoughts on
which option is more feasible and cost-effective​, or any alternatives we're not considering?

This is in a freezing climate. Thank you in advance!


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
13 Comments
Pete H
5/6/2026 06:28:02 am

Cost Effective - The pond. You don't have to build a water storage tank and a pump.

Feasible - Storage tank and pump. You can fill the water storage tank. You can heat the water storage tank.

Additionally possible: Maybe there's an aquifer below it all.

Reply
Anthony
5/6/2026 07:48:00 am

If the pond is reliably full then there is no issue. You may need a piece of paper stating that from a civil or environmental engineer. This is an easy option, comes with a few extra issues with raw water NFAP 13 and 20. There are non trivial issues with putting in a wet well and structure to house a pump at the pond. Or ensuring the suction pipe is buried sufficiently to always be full without draining the pond and flooding the immediate area.

If you're able to put a 15K gal tank on a pad directly behind the building it will be 100% simpler, to me at least.

Reply
Ryan Grant
5/6/2026 08:21:55 am

I would do a pond with a dry hydrant for fire apparatus pumping. As for the sprinkler system, you almost have to do an elevated tank with a fire pump. Fire pumps aren't meant to pull or maintain a draft for immediate water.

Reply
Matt C.
5/6/2026 08:32:49 am

The most reliable option (especially long-term) in my opinion is an underground tank. These can be quite expensive however. I'm in Ontario, Canada and larger pre-cast concrete tanks can run over 100k, less for the size OP needs though. Large poly tanks are up there as well. the advantage is that if done right, wont freeze, or have the issues raw water sources do.
The most economical is to use the pond, and run a draft pipe directly to a draft hydrant. Keep in mind the maximum suction lift your FD apparatus can produce. Talk to them and see if they have a policy on how draft hydrants need to be constructed (connection types, max lift, colour coding, signage, protection such as curbs/bollards, etc.). Also for protection against freezing, make sure that you account for surface ice accumulation for the pond, and that your depth of bury is under the frost line for any piping and for your tanks.

Reply
Matt C.
5/6/2026 10:52:04 am

Sorry I missed the fact that this building is sprinklered.
In my jurisdiction the building must be equipped with a fire pump. For sites equipped with a fire pump, we don't allow drafting. Since there's a pump required anyway, it makes sense to to extend a line from the pump to the hydrant. Just make sure you account for outside hose allowance in your calcs.
The water source can technically be a pond, but we HIGHLY discourage it since it can be hard on the pumps if not maintained extremely well. tanks are preferred and can be filled from a well pump on a float switch for automatic filling

Reply
Jesse
5/6/2026 08:51:50 am

I always question the reliability of existing ponds. i.e. depth, continuity of volume, etc. I have one project currently with a pond but its being built specifically for fire. And the pond option limits your pump choices to just one. In the long run, a tank is more reliable.

Reply
Mark Harris
5/6/2026 09:20:29 am

If you do the pond has to be vertical pump. NFPA 20 requires flooded suction on a horizontal pump. If you go that route this hydraulic institute manual gives guidance on the pump intake well construction. https://www.pumps.org/product/engineering-data-book-second-edition/

You mention freezing climate so would need to consider pound freeze depth for both your intake and available water supply.

You need to run cost estimates on your different options. As far as tank could be fiberglass underground with a vertical pump or above ground with a vertical pump. That is not a huge tank so I have seen tank and pump room be installed as an addition room to the building to heat the room and avoid tank water heater. Can find different tank options in FM Approval Guide.

Need to consider refill requirements for the tank option as well.

Reply
Glenn Berger
5/6/2026 09:26:35 am

I would go with the one option that you get to control:

The dedicated water tank - it might be the most expensive from a construction standpoint, but it is reliable.

Reply
Dan Wilder
5/6/2026 10:56:51 am

How much of the pond capacity becomes unusable during the freeze conditions? Is the pond continuously fed via natural sources or by more manual efforts like a well and pump? Are there seismic consideration for a tank?

Short term costs will be higher with a tank, but the reliability aspect should be a deciding consideration. You can also heat the tank, ponds not as easily. Maintenance of the pond (dredging & clearing sediment & organic materials vs inspections) also needs to be accounted for if used along with minimum depths above intakes. The tank would have built in methods for this.

Reply
Ro
5/6/2026 11:31:37 am

There are a few other considerations not mentioned to aid in this resolve. I am assuming since indicated there is currently only a domestic well incapable of meeting the sprinkler demand. This tells me the requirement for site fire flow is also not met. The elevation from what would be the pump suction inlet to the expected low point elevation of the pond after the flow demand is met will also determine if a standard fire pump can be utilized as they normally have a limited amount of "lift" capability. If the project will end up requiring a vertical turbine pump, I would believe the cost for such a small demand would highly exceed installing a small water tank. Based on the tank size of 15k gallons it would also appear no consideration for the required hose stream was included. Is the AHJ willing to make accommodations for the hose demand if a permanent draft line can be installed from the pond? Will the AHJ allow for omision of any required fire hydrants or requirement for minimum site fire flow? Can you meet the required distances for an fdc location?

Reply
James Art, FPE
5/6/2026 02:37:38 pm

Did one similar a warehouse in Northern Ca,
(where freezing is not a concern)
Local very rural AHJ approved a fire sprinkler system installed
before any water supply!
But they had a very large artificial pond, including decorative fish,
and were able to put in code compliant screens,
(must be removable to maintain clean)
and a large pit next to the pond with a horizontal fire pump under positive pressure.
All had to be "weatherproof".

Reply
Nimal Tissa Wijetunga
5/6/2026 08:49:18 pm

Fire engineering is all about reliability to a level where no any other engineering discipline consider.
Therefore, totally independent above ground tank with horizontal suction to be required in my view.
Since, the question mentioned about 15000 us gallons as capacity, I would say that it may not be adequate if external hydrants of 21/2 inch or 65mm is considered.

Reply
Edgar Carr link
6/9/2026 12:43:41 pm

I had similar situation. A rural dining hall at a Camp. Our choices were... 1) install a water tower like a ruraql school; build a coffer dam in a nearby lake; (proved infeasible) 3) purchase and install a pressure tank w/ generator and pump. Choice 4) was run a six inch buried line from closest municipal source some six miles away.

We went to pressure tank route w/ a conditioned pump house and generator.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 3-601-02
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • STUDENTS
    • LAND JOB/INTERNSHIPS
    • STUDENT CONNECTOR
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT