I am preparing an assessment for adding a fire protection sprinkler system to an approximately 9,000 sqft existing single-story building that is a state half-way house for juveniles after being released from detention. Fewer than 16 occupants excluding staff.
The architect has deemed it Group R-3 occupancy (although I wonder if Group R-4 Condition 1 is more appropriate.) IFC 903.3.1.2 permits NFPA 13R throughout Group R, and this meets the three stated conditions for this section. Section 903.1.3 allows NFPA 13D in some applications; the list is separated by semicolons and includes R-3 and R-4 condition 1. However, more square feet of this facility is dedicated to non-residential purposes (meeting rooms, classrooms, kitchen, etc.). This seems counter to the scope of NFPA 13D. Even the IFC commentary mentions the use of 13D, but for one- and two-family dwellings. And I'd prefer an FDC and more than a 10-minute water duration. I'm a sprinkler guy, and not a building code expert. My gut says NFPA 13R is most appropriate (and I will ask the building code official), but what nuance am I missing here? Budget-wise NFPA 13D is way more favorable, but it just doesn't seem right. I'd like to know if both NFPA 13D & NFPA 13R are acceptable options for this type of building. Thanks in advance. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Pete H
4/10/2025 06:38:48 am
Sounds like you got it right, in my opinion. It sounds like 13R. It has common areas as opposed to a two family dwelling.
Reply
Jesse
4/10/2025 08:08:32 am
Yeah I agree with you. I don't really see 13D as being the most appropriate governing standard.
Reply
Casey Milhorn
4/10/2025 08:23:21 am
Also a sprinkler guy here, and not a code hawk like some of these amazing folks on here. BUT, I would agree with Pete. I always tell my designers and estimators, do NOT make this type of call. Check the code review sheet for guidance. If it's not spelled out, then this is the job of the architect/engineer team, not the contractor. Shoot them an RFI. They will play ignorant, or sometimes they just are, and will try and get you to make this call. Do not do it. Be helpful, but don't let them push the liability on to you.
Reply
Art Gould
4/10/2025 10:03:36 am
I would call it 13R or maybe even a full NFPA 13 system but, as a sprinkler designer, that is not my job to make that call.
Reply
Jack G
4/10/2025 11:52:17 am
NFPA 13 d was created for 1 and 2 family dwellings and manufactured homes so I would say it doesn’t apply.
Reply
OP
4/11/2025 11:37:13 am
Thank you all! That tells me my sprinkler gut is still working, even on the engineering side. I did confirm with the AHJ that 13R was acceptable for this project. I was second-guessing myself and thinking all that underground work that could be avoided with a 13D, but it just seemed wrong. Tnanks Casey for that NFPA 101 reminder; it can be a blind spot for me.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
4/14/2025 03:04:48 am
The determination of the appropriate Occupancy Classification (OC) by the scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2024) will determine the appropriate Automatic Sprinkler System (ASPS) to be used.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
4/14/2025 03:06:03 am
REFERENCES
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop March '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
April 2025
PE PREP SERIES |