MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Use NFPA 13D or NFPA 13R for Group Home?

4/10/2025

8 Comments

 
I am preparing an assessment for adding a fire protection sprinkler system to an approximately 9,000 sqft existing single-story building that is a state half-way house for juveniles after being released from detention. Fewer than 16 occupants excluding staff.

The architect has deemed it Group R-3 occupancy (although I wonder if Group R-4 Condition 1 is more appropriate.)

IFC 903.3.1.2 permits NFPA 13R throughout Group R, and this meets the three stated conditions for this section.

Section 903.1.3 allows NFPA 13D in some applications; the list is separated by semicolons and includes R-3 and R-4 condition 1. However
, more square feet of this facility is dedicated to non-residential purposes (meeting rooms, classrooms, kitchen, etc.).

This seems counter to the scope of NFPA 13D. Even the IFC commentary mentions the use of 13D, but for one- and two-family dwellings. And I'd prefer an FDC and more than a 10-minute water duration.

I'm a sprinkler guy, and not a building code expert. My gut says NFPA 13R is most appropriate (and I will ask the building code official), but what nuance am I missing here?

Budget-wise NFPA 13D is way more favorable, but it just doesn't seem right. I'd like to know if both NFPA 13D & NFPA 13R are acceptable options for this type of building.

​Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Pete H
4/10/2025 06:38:48 am

Sounds like you got it right, in my opinion. It sounds like 13R. It has common areas as opposed to a two family dwelling.

That said, you're a sprinkler guy, not a code expert as you say, check the code sheet of the set if there is one and see what they're expecting you to design towards. The architect may have taken exceptions that require a specific type of sprinkler system.

Reply
Jesse
4/10/2025 08:08:32 am

Yeah I agree with you. I don't really see 13D as being the most appropriate governing standard.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
4/10/2025 08:23:21 am

Also a sprinkler guy here, and not a code hawk like some of these amazing folks on here. BUT, I would agree with Pete. I always tell my designers and estimators, do NOT make this type of call. Check the code review sheet for guidance. If it's not spelled out, then this is the job of the architect/engineer team, not the contractor. Shoot them an RFI. They will play ignorant, or sometimes they just are, and will try and get you to make this call. Do not do it. Be helpful, but don't let them push the liability on to you.
Secondly, from painful experience, I would ask the question if NFPA 101 has been adopted in your area. This can affect the design approach and require protection in areas normally excluded by 13D or 13R, when dealing with group homes. I don't recall all the details, but I do know we were made to go back and add protection in canopeis/overhangs and also in attics (I think there was an option for smoke detection instead, and maybe it went that route?). Good luck!

Reply
Art Gould
4/10/2025 10:03:36 am

I would call it 13R or maybe even a full NFPA 13 system but, as a sprinkler designer, that is not my job to make that call.

The responsibility of making that call is 100% up to the registered/licensed architect of record and NOT the lowly sprinkler designer.

About 12 years ago I did a 12,000 sq ft single story motel that I am sure 99% of sprinkler designers would have called a 13R system but it wasn't... it was a full 13 system with a dry system in the attic etc. Something about code, construction type and means of egress.

Sprinkler designers work with standards and not codes.

Reply
Jack G
4/10/2025 11:52:17 am

NFPA 13 d was created for 1 and 2 family dwellings and manufactured homes so I would say it doesn’t apply.
In the states I work in this would not be considered an R occupancy but an I-1 occupancy.
The I occupancy gives you a choice of detection or fire sprinklers.
Considering the R occupancy in nj any home over 5 occupants should have a 13r system.
Considering group R:
R-1 is hotels/motels .
R-2 apartment buildings.
R-3 is 1 and 2 family dwellings.
R-4 is residential care facilities. Usually with occupancy of up to 300.
Sprinkler systems in group R can be either quick response or residential type.
If the facility has mental health patients or has correctional facilities institutional sprinklers may be appropriate.
For I facilities the type of system should be 13r.
For R - 4 : facilities more than 5 but not more than 16 occupants excluding staff and reside on a 24 hour basis in a supervised residential environment and receive custodial care . A 13 r system is appropriate.
13 d would apply in 1-2 family dwellings .
13 R would apply in R occupancies.
Also a manual or automatic fire alarm system is required and must activate the occupant notification system as outlined in 907 of the IBC.

Reply
OP
4/11/2025 11:37:13 am

Thank you all! That tells me my sprinkler gut is still working, even on the engineering side. I did confirm with the AHJ that 13R was acceptable for this project. I was second-guessing myself and thinking all that underground work that could be avoided with a 13D, but it just seemed wrong. Tnanks Casey for that NFPA 101 reminder; it can be a blind spot for me.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
4/14/2025 03:04:48 am

The determination of the appropriate Occupancy Classification (OC) by the scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2024) will determine the appropriate Automatic Sprinkler System (ASPS) to be used.

The difference between a Group R Residential and a Group I Institutional OC determination (in this situation) is based on IF the occupants are "detained for penal or correctional purposes or in which the liberty of the occupants is restricted."

The term "halfway house" is not defined by the scoping Code (IBC-2024) but this term is included in 308.2 Institutional Group I-1 (see REFERENCES below).

If the AHJ has determined that "13R was acceptable for this project", then the OC has to be Group R - Residential based on 903.3.1.2 NFPA 13R.

I recommend getting this OC determination by the (plan review) AHJ in writing as the (inspecting) AHJ and/or the Fire Marshal may have different opinions.

Reply
Todd E Wyatt
4/14/2025 03:06:03 am

REFERENCES

IBC-2024
Chapter 3 Occupancy Classification and Use
Section 308 Institutional Group I
308.1 Institutional Group I
Institutional Group I occupancy includes, among others, the use of a building or structure, or a portion thereof, in which care or supervision is provided to persons who are or are incapable of self-preservation without physical assistance or in which persons are detained for penal or correctional purposes or in which the liberty of the occupants is restricted. Institutional occupancies shall be classified as Group I-1, I-2, I-3 or I-4.
308.2 Institutional Group I-1
Institutional Group I-1 occupancy shall include buildings, structures or portions thereof for more than 16 persons, excluding staff, who reside on a 24-hour basis in a supervised environment and receive custodial care. Buildings of Group I-1 shall be classified as one of the occupancy conditions specified in Section 308.2.1 or 308.2.2 and shall comply with Section 420. This group shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
HALFWAY HOUSES

Section 310 Residential Group R
310.1 Residential Group R
Residential Group R includes, among others, the use of a building or structure, or a portion thereof, for sleeping purposes when not classified as an Institutional Group I or when not regulated by the International Residential Code. Group R occupancies not constructed in accordance with the International Residential Code as permitted by Sections 310.4.1 and 310.4.2 shall comply with Section 420.
310.5 Residential Group R-4
Residential Group R-4 occupancy shall include buildings, structures or portions thereof for more than five but not more than 16 persons, excluding staff, who reside on a 24-hour basis in a supervised residential environment and receive custodial care. Buildings of Group R-4 shall be classified as one of the occupancy conditions specified in Section 310.5.1 or 310.5.2. This group shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
HALFWAY HOUSES

Group R-4 occupancies shall meet the requirements for construction as defined for Group R-3, except as otherwise provided for in this code.

Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems
Section 903 Automatic Sprinkler Systems
903.2 Where Required
903.2.6 Group I
An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings with a Group I fire area.
Exceptions:
1. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.2 shall be permitted in Group I-1, Condition 1 facilities.
2. An automatic sprinkler system is not required where Group I-4 day care facilities are at the level of exit discharge and where every room where care is provided has not fewer than one exterior exit door.
3. In buildings where Group I-4 day care is provided on levels other than the level of exit discharge, an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 shall be installed on the entire floor where care is provided, all floors between the level of care and the level of exit discharge, and all floors below the level of exit discharge other than areas classified as an open parking garage.

903.2.8 Group R
An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area.
[F] 903.2.8.1 Group R-3
An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.3 shall be permitted in Group R-3 occupancies.
[F] 903.2.8.2 Group R-4, Condition 1
An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.3 shall be permitted in Group R-4, Condition 1 occupancies.
[F] 903.2.8.3 Care Facilities
An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.3 shall be permitted in care facilities with five or fewer individuals in a single-family dwelling.

903.3 Installation Requirements
903.3.1 Standards
Automatic sprinkler systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 unless otherwise permitted by Sections 903.3.1.2 and 903.3.1.3 and other chapters of this code, as applicable.
[F] 903.3.1.1 NFPA 13 Sprinkler Systems
[F] 903.3.1.2 NFPA 13R Sprinkler Systems
Automatic sprinkler systems in Group R occupancies shall be permitted to be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13R where the Group R occupancy meets all of the following conditions:
1. Four stories or fewer above grade plane.
2. For other than Group R-2 occupancies, the floor level of the highest story is 30 feet (9144 mm) or less above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access.

For Group R-2 occupancies, the roof assembly is less than 45 feet (13 716 mm) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. The height of the roof assembly shall be determined by measuring the distance from the lowest required fire vehicle access road surface adjacent to the building to the eave of the highest pitched roof, the intersection of the highest roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the highest parapet, whichever yields the greatest dis

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Oct '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT