MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Use NFPA 13 Table or Product Data for Spacing?

1/17/2023

9 Comments

 
The maximum allowable protection area for a sprinkler listed is in Table 8.6.2.2.1(a) of NFPA 13 (2016 Edition).

Section 8.5.2.1.1(1)(b) says to choose the larger of twice the distance to the wall, or the distance to the next sprinkler.

Do we use the protection areas in Table 8.6.2.2.1(a) when applying this code section, or do you use the maximum allowable protection area for a sprinkler that's listed in the manufacturer's data?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Dan Wilder
1/17/2023 07:48:16 am

This is quick answer but a very deep subject, so I'll try to answer as best as I can.

Nearly every standard coverage sprinkler I can think of refers back to NFPA 13 for area maximums. Those areas are defined via 8.5.2.1 for standard coverage sprinklers using A=SxL. As in much of NFPA, as you read deeper into sections, it starts general and becomes more restrictive/specific.

If there is a MFG data sheet indicting a more restrictive maximum area, that must be followed.

8.5.2.1 - General definition (all sprinklers) how to find area of coverage and maximums.
8.6.2.2.1 - Area of Coverage maximums specific to Light Hazard

So, yes, use the Table 8.5.2.1 with 8.6.2.2.1 (a) to establish maximum protection areas based on the criteria to establish the "S" (Distance between sprinklers or 2x the distance to the wall when <7'-6") multiplied by the "L" (Distance between branch lines or 2x the distance to the wall when <7'-6"). In either case, both of those maximum distances will be 15' for Light Hazard (excluding small room rule).

Other sprinkler types and hazards carry their own separate requirements.

Reply
Anthony
1/17/2023 08:15:14 am

If the sprinkler is "listed" as a standard spray sprinkler it will have a maximum area a 225sqft. As that is the definition of such a sprinkler.

Anything larger than 225sqft is considered extended coverage and thus falls under the rules of 8.8 and 8.9 (generally).

NFPA 13-16
3.6.4.11.1 Standard Spray Sprinkler. A spray sprinkler with
maximum coverage areas as specified in Sections 8.6 and
8.7 of this standard.

Reply
Alex
1/17/2023 10:01:46 am

Anthony said it well!

Reply
Jesse
1/17/2023 08:32:09 am

Important to remember, that just because a standard coverage sprinkler is listed for 225-sq. ft coverage - or an Extended Coverage sprinkler is listed for 400 sq. ft. coverage doesn't mean you can space it that far.

Because sprinkler coverage area is an vital component of the area / density calc, (i.e. Sq. Rt of Pressure End Head * K-factor / Coverage Area) you might not have the water supply available to space standard coverage sprinklers at 225 sq. ft.. You might have to go a little less. Its a lot more noticable using EC sprinklers when the data sheet gives you the differing flow parameters based upon coverage, but the same principle holds true for standard coverage sprinklers.

Reply
Franck
1/17/2023 10:17:13 am

As a summary, use the manufacturer’s data if maximum coverage area is smaller than the one indicated in Table 8.6.2.2.1(a), as long as the final coverage area is fine with hydraulic calculations, as outlined by Jesse.

As an example, a manufacturer max area for a given sprinkler might be 225 sq ft, but when used in a specific storage arrangement, the final requirement might be 100 sq ft maximum, or even less if the required density ends up with a required pressure from the hydraulic calculation that can’t be supplied by your fire pump.

Reply
Jess L.
1/17/2023 10:29:23 am

Read your sprinkler cutsheets. Read your sprinkler cutsheets. Read your sprinkler cutsheets. Read your sprinkler cutsheets.

Reply
Bill
2/7/2023 02:40:40 am

So, in say a residential application (light hazard) or in other words 225sq ft max. But the head used is listed for 400sq ft given it has enough pressure and gpm. Assume this head has sufficient supply to spray the listed 400sqft. Do you follow NFPA (225sqft) regardless? Or does the listing supercede the light hazard code?

Reply
John
2/7/2023 02:42:03 am

Looking for the answer to this as well.

Wes
2/7/2023 07:52:44 am

Bill, what's the specific sprinkler model? Might be able to help by looking at the cutsheet.

Also, as it's residential, are we under NFPA 13, or NFPA 13R or 13D?

If it's NFPA 13, Residential Sprinklers (under Chapter 12 of NFPA 13 2022 Edition) have Areas of Coverage in accordance with their listing (Section 12.1.6.1). It would be a Residential occupancy hazard classification, not Light Hazard. So if it meets the pressure and flow requirements of the listing at 400 sqft, then it would be compliant with NFPA 13.

That's not necessarily an easy thing to achieve, because 400 sqft with NFPA 13 0.10 gpm/sqft is 40 gpm out of each sprinkler. That's quite a bit to flow for smaller k-factors.

If you're under NFPA 13R or 13D, then that density requirement falls to 0.05 gpm/sqft so you'd only need 20 gpm (400 sqft x 0.05 gpm/sqft) out of each sprinkler. The data sheets usually show tables for 13R and 13D and expect the reader to calculate their own minimum flow if it's a 13 system.

Post a link to the cutsheet and we can chat on this.




Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT