I work for a local fire department that does plan reviews for fire protection systems. We are reviewing a project that requires 40,000 gallons of stored water. They are proposing using multiple fire water tanks and eight 5,000-gallon tanks.
While NFPA does not restrict the use of multiple tanks, I would like to see fewer tanks than eight. I am more inclined to allow two separate tanks at the most. However, I wanted to see what others thought and if there was a standard understanding or practice to number or size of tanks to the total needed water demand. Thanks for any help. Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
17 Comments
Glenn Berger
12/23/2024 08:07:01 am
The use of 8 tanks is definitely unique. Will need more project information to understand this design solution. Most of my projects will utilize a single tank when required. Double tanks when the water supply is extremely unreliable or when dealing with significant hazards.
Reply
Anthony
12/23/2024 08:08:41 am
This is an off choice but I don't think its "wrong" I just wouldn't do it this way.
Reply
JI
12/23/2024 08:11:33 am
I don't see any issues with this arrangement. As long as proper arrangement of check valves, float valves, and any other arrangements required to ensure smooth operation are met I would not have issues. I assume this contractor would be using this arrangement to either save money, save time of building a custom tank, or to be able to have the tank arrangement be built in a tight area.
Reply
J
12/23/2024 08:19:34 am
While NFPA does not restrict the use of multiple tanks, I would like to see fewer tanks than eight.
Reply
J.H.
12/23/2024 08:40:11 am
NFPA 1142:4.1.4 The AHJ shall be permitted to specify how the water supplies required in this document are provided, giving consideration to local conditions and need.
Reply
J.H.
12/23/2024 08:20:01 am
Consult with operations, since the tanks are for them to use.
Reply
Chad
12/23/2024 08:22:23 am
Maybe you should propose that the operation and maintenance schedule will be adhere to strictly for every single component, and you will be there to ensure that it gets done?
Reply
Jimmy
12/23/2024 08:50:45 am
8 Tank installed correctly can be within code.
Reply
J.H.
12/23/2024 09:21:43 am
A manifold situation would be fine, as long as the total refill time is within the maximum 8 hrs per NFPA 22:4.2.1.4.
Reply
José Figueroa
12/23/2024 09:49:23 am
It sounds like you have a very unique arrangement, and I appreciate the potential complexities involved. Could you please provide a schematic of the tanks? Specifically, I’m interested to know if they are gravity-fed or above ground, and how they are connected to the fire pump. Are they utilizing principles like Archimedes' or communicating vessels? It would be great to understand whether they are working in parallel or in series, and the configuration, such as one tank positioned above another.
Reply
Jack G
12/23/2024 10:35:36 am
The only thing i can think of for 8 tanks is that they are being set up inside a heated space? Otherwise the costs to heat and maintain would be astronomical.
Reply
Jose Figueroa
12/23/2024 10:48:12 am
Jack, I greatly appreciate your insightful observations about the dead water and heating issues. Your points are extremely helpful. Thank you!
Reply
Jesse
12/23/2024 01:22:13 pm
I've was on the AHJ side for a long time. The issue is, the arrangement is not disallowed by code. So, you don;t have a legitimate code reason to reject the submittal.
Reply
J.H.
12/23/2024 01:44:29 pm
It is the AHJ's responsibility to reject the submittal if the sum of the parts doesn't meet minimum performance objectives. If they are using tanks, they are already in an alternative water supply situation and they must demonstrate that their arrangement will meet fire department access and water supply requirements, as well as NFPA 22 and NFPA 1142 criteria.
Reply
Mark Harris
12/29/2024 05:38:59 pm
Had a situation once where owner installed three smaller diameter manifolded tanks sized to meet the requirements. As JL noted it was due to tight spaces and also they were originally planning on a city supply that did not materialize so Jon's note about availability also came into play. Owner did it so no idea on cost. Was in AZ desert near Mexican border so freezing was not an issue. Agree with comments that should be acceptable but may not be the best life of system total cost solution.
Reply
Ricardo Gonzales Jr
12/30/2024 08:37:10 am
As a former AHJ, does the proposed solution violate code? Feelings can't be defended in court. Unfortunately, I get a lot of AHJs using their feelings instead of facts or the code to justify their rejection of a design. Walking that line can be tough, but always look at it from a "I need to defend this decision from a legal viewpoint". Being on the stand is an extremely stressful situation.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop November '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
January 2025
PE PREP SERIES |