|
We have a project that is modifying an existing dry pipe sprinkler system to protect exterior paint-booth exhaust ductwork at a vehicle manufacturing facility, with large and complex ducts exposed to extreme temperatures. The owner prohibits the use of upright sprinklers.
Are there any listed dry pendent sprinklers available at 650°F (or comparable) suitable for exhaust duct protection? Is the use of dry pendents inside high-temperature exhaust ducts acceptable or recommended by manufacturers or NFPA standards (NFPA 13 / NFPA 33)? The owner is not allowing uprights on this project. Are there any viable alternate sprinkler or suppression methods that meet listing and code requirements? Is this application better addressed outside standard sprinkler protection? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
Jesse
12/29/2025 08:19:51 am
I can't find a dry-pendent with a thermal rating that high. What about an explosion suppression system?
Reply
Jesse
12/29/2025 08:26:05 am
By the way, quick plug for the Meyer Fire Tool Kit. One of the functions is the Sprinkler Selector. In those weird cases where we we can't seem to find that obscure sprirnkler that does what we need it to do, this Tool Kit has saved me a ton of time. If you're not subscribing to it, I highly recommend it!
Reply
Dan Wilder
12/29/2025 09:22:03 am
Couple of options I can think of...
Reply
Thomas Jones
12/31/2025 02:32:05 pm
Per NFPA 33, the booth cannot exceed 200F.
Reply
Anonymous
1/14/2026 11:00:21 am
Could you elaborate on the explosion suppression system? Also the Owners just responded back and said the sample temp comes out to be 618° which means we wont meet the 50° above requirement. So it sounds as if we will have to do Deluge?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Sept '26 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
October 2026
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
