MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Two Fire Dampers for a "Double" Fire Wall?

10/4/2019

10 Comments

 
Being told I need two fire dampers to serve a single fire wall. The fire wall is made of a "double wall", essentially two masonry walls next to each other with a very small (less than 2-inch) air gap in-between. The engineer on the project is stating that this "double wall" requires a fire damper in each.

I've never come across this as a requirement before. Do I need two fire dampers?

​​​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Paul Pinigis link
10/4/2019 10:28:29 am

A double fire wall is an assembly of two rated wall, so each wall is required to maintain its rating in the event that the other wall collapses. Therefore, each would have to have its own fire damper. This is also true if there is a door through the wall, each wall would have to have an appropriately-rated door.

Reply
efi sher
10/4/2019 11:45:27 am

Why to use double fire wall if you can construct a single fire wall with the required fire rating.The rating of the wall is for the whole element no matter the side.
This concept leads to sigle fire damper depnds on the width of the wall.Fire damper rating is the sme for both sides of the damper.

Reply
Cyril McIvor
10/4/2019 11:49:15 am

A double skin masonry wall is very common and only requires a single fire damper constructed to suit the width of the two skins including the gap between. It would be impossible to install two fire dampers as it is not possible to installed the required angles for each damper for each skin. The installation of fire dampers requires the damper to have retaining angles on both sides of the wall.

Whoever came up with the idea that you need two dampers in this situation has no common-sense and does not know how a damper must be installed. Back to kindergarten school for him

Reply
Paul Pinigis link
10/4/2019 12:46:31 pm

CYRIL MCIVOR, please define "double skin wall". If you have two 2-hour walls together to make a three hour wall, but only one fire damper, how do you maintain the 2-hour rating of the unprotected opening when the wall with the damper collapses?

Reply
Paul Pinigis
10/4/2019 01:53:51 pm

From NFPA 221, 2018:

6.10.3* Double Fire Walls. Openings in double ƒre walls shall
be protected using one ƒre door in each separate wall.

5.10 Ducts and Air Transfer Openings.
5.10.2 HC ƒre walls shall be protected with two ƒre damper
assemblies.

Reply
Cyril McIvor
10/4/2019 02:00:23 pm

The sole reason to construct a wall with two skins is to achieve the nominated fire rating level. If a check of a masonry wall construction manual is made it will be seen that this wall is most likely only rated for 2 hours as a combined system (similar to dry wall construction) with brick ties between the two skins of masonry. Otherwise why build to separate wall systems so close together.

A lot depends on the design of the wall to achieve the fire rating. This is a circular discussion until the design of the wall is clearly understood. Certainly adding two 2 hour walls together does not give you a 3 hour wall so much more depends on getting the 3 hour rating

Reply
Paul Pinigis
10/4/2019 03:10:14 pm

CYRIL MCIVOR, I don't think that you understand the requirements for firewalls. Please read NFPA 221 before suggesting that anyone else go back to kindergarten.

Two 2-hour walls do, in fact, make one 3-hour fire wall (see table 4.6 of NFPA 221).

We are not talking about two layers of masonry on a single wall, we are talking about a double fire wall (two fire rated walls in close proximity).

There is so much wrong with your responses that I will simply chalk them up to inexperience.

Reply
Efi SHER
10/5/2019 12:23:45 am

Why use double wall for 3 hours
Below one example.You can find much more with UL approved

The 3-hour Area Separation Wall System is a 3-hour fire wall consisting of two layers of 1 in. (25.4 mm)
shaftliner panels friction-fit between 2 in. (50.8 mm) light-gauge steel H-Studs and a layer of
5/8" Fire-Shield C gypsum board fastened to each side of the studs.
The steel H-Studs are attached to adjacent framing on each side with heat-softenable, aluminum
break-away clips (ASW clips) that allow for collapse of the fire-exposed unit without collapse of the
Area Separation Wall.

Reply
Matt Duggan
11/3/2020 07:12:29 pm

I am reading this thread from the perspective of the person needing the double fire wall with a door in each fire wall. Doors would have to swing opposite directions to meet this requirement, I think, which means a double fire wall could not be used in an egress condition where doors both have to open in the direction of travel to the exit. Sounds like I need a tied or cantilevered fire wall instead of a double fire wall for my situation. I need a codes illustrated book for this

Reply
Moderator
11/10/2020 06:25:48 am

Matt - your question makes for a great discussion. I've posted it as a daily question today, here:

https://www.meyerfire.com/daily/egress-ok-through-doors-in-double-firewall

Feel free to add to the discussion on this new thread too.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top April '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT