MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About
Picture
A FORUM FOR FIRE PROTECTION QUESTIONS & PE EXAM PROBLEMS | SUBSCRIBE NOW

Threaded Over Grooved Branch Pipe?

7/29/2019

6 Comments

 
Lately I have seen a couple specifications require branch lines to have threaded connections and they specifically do not allow grooved, even when Schedule 40 pipe is used and even when most of the armover connections are welded pipe outlets. 

These could just be old/outdated specs, but is there a reason/theory that suggests threaded connections are better than grooved? They can be cheaper but also can increase labor costs on large jobs. Just curious if there's a perspective I'm not considering here, thanks in advance.

​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Thomas Jones III
7/29/2019 10:04:18 am

Thread pipes are more expensive to install, more prone to leak, and harder to replace on service work. I would recommend grooving anything over 1". Sometimes it makes sense to thread when you are trying to work with the hydraulics.

Reply
David link
7/29/2019 10:18:54 am

Thomas Jones III,
I have to ask. Where do you see the hydraulics advantage of threaded pipe and fittings compared to grooved pipe and fittings when the pipe is schedule 40 for both types of connections?

Reply
Dominic
7/29/2019 10:19:23 am

I think a lot of times those specs are outdated, but I will say threaded pipe gives a more cleaner look than grooved pipe. You can notice when you weld 1 1/4 and 1 1/2 pipe it can deform the pipe, making it hard to keep the lines straight and to pitch the lines for proper drainage.

Reply
Ivonn link
7/29/2019 11:47:00 am

It can be a bad experience with a coupling, some leakage that damages the product and they consider that a threaded accessory is safer.
A coupling that is damaged the metal part or the gasket could not fail until long after unlike a leak in a thread fitting thats it shows immediately or at least is that I have heard from customers.

In my opinion both are reliable if they are installed correctly

Reply
Rusty Scott
7/29/2019 02:58:24 pm

I've been on both the contractor and engineering side. My old contractor company liked to use threaded in certain cases and grooved in others, all about the $. It just depended on the floorplan layout size. I will say a lot of the time on tree systems we used threaded branch outlets. Also our labor force is from GA and SC where labor costs are significantly less than lets say TX or CA for example.

On the engineering side, our specifications use to read that 2" and smaller be schedule 40 because threading branch piping was just the way the world worked back in the day. Our specs now have options that allow Schedule 10 for 1 1/4" and larger when grooved.

In my experience I have never had a thread leak after the 200 psi pressure test has been approved. I have however had grooved couplings leak after the fact. This is typically on main piping where there were a lot of fittings or on the riser where it's harder to brace.

Another comparison to think about, (when there is a fire pump involved) we allow threaded reducer fittings but do not allow grooved reducer couplings. We've had cases on the contractor side where the reducer coupling failed and water dumped on a tissue paper manufacturer's storage facility. The blowout of the grooved coupling tends to be much greater than that of a threaded fitting.

Reply
Ben O'Regan link
7/30/2019 10:09:39 am

I can't imagine a contractor being happy about installing pipe over 2" diameter threaded. It's hard work doing up those larger connections compared to one bolt for a grooved coupling. Even though the materials might be cheaper the contractor is going to charge more for their trouble.

Another difference is rigidity - grooved couplings flex, threaded joints are stiffer, but that's usually not an issue at all.

Both systems are quite reliable. I have seen threaded connections rust out if they have been in service for a very long time (like 50 years). I don't know about grooved couplings, maybe they can deteriorate if they get old enough.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jump to: Daily Posts
    Jump to: PE Problems
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    Free Signup

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    Community

    Thank You to Our Top
    ​October '20 Contributors!
    1. SK
    2. Franck
    3. Dan W.
    4. Jonathan ​5. Casey M.
    6. Sean
    7. Colin L.
    8. Mike
    9. Jonathan J
    ​10. Daniel G.


    Your Post

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    The Toolkit

    Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?
    ​
    ​Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:
    Picture
    FREE 30-DAY TRIAL
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    Filters

    All
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    IFC
    Information Sources For Analysis
    IRC
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 12
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management Systems
    Special Hazard Systems
    Types Of Analysis
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    June 2015


    Daily
    Daily discussions are open-ended fire protection, fire alarm, and life safety questions submitted anonymously for the benefit of sharing expertise and learning from other perspectives. Anyone can submit a question here:
    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    Exam Prep

    Picture
    2020 PE Prep Guide​
    ​(Available Now!)
    Picture
    PE Prep Series
    ​(Available Now!)
    2020 PE Prep Series
    Current Leaderboard
    ​(Click to enlarge)
    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep

    PE Problems
    ​Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.

    Solutions are posted the day after posting.

    Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.

    Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.

    RSS Feed

Home - About - Blog - Contact - Exam Prep - Store
Picture
Copyright © 2020 MeyerFire, LLC
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author shown and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a commission for orders placed elsewhere.
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About