MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Threaded Over Grooved Branch Pipe?

7/29/2019

6 Comments

 
Lately I have seen a couple specifications require branch lines to have threaded connections and they specifically do not allow grooved, even when Schedule 40 pipe is used and even when most of the armover connections are welded pipe outlets. 

These could just be old/outdated specs, but is there a reason/theory that suggests threaded connections are better than grooved? They can be cheaper but also can increase labor costs on large jobs. Just curious if there's a perspective I'm not considering here, thanks in advance.

​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Thomas Jones III
7/29/2019 10:04:18 am

Thread pipes are more expensive to install, more prone to leak, and harder to replace on service work. I would recommend grooving anything over 1". Sometimes it makes sense to thread when you are trying to work with the hydraulics.

Reply
David link
7/29/2019 10:18:54 am

Thomas Jones III,
I have to ask. Where do you see the hydraulics advantage of threaded pipe and fittings compared to grooved pipe and fittings when the pipe is schedule 40 for both types of connections?

Reply
Dominic
7/29/2019 10:19:23 am

I think a lot of times those specs are outdated, but I will say threaded pipe gives a more cleaner look than grooved pipe. You can notice when you weld 1 1/4 and 1 1/2 pipe it can deform the pipe, making it hard to keep the lines straight and to pitch the lines for proper drainage.

Reply
Ivonn link
7/29/2019 11:47:00 am

It can be a bad experience with a coupling, some leakage that damages the product and they consider that a threaded accessory is safer.
A coupling that is damaged the metal part or the gasket could not fail until long after unlike a leak in a thread fitting thats it shows immediately or at least is that I have heard from customers.

In my opinion both are reliable if they are installed correctly

Reply
Rusty Scott
7/29/2019 02:58:24 pm

I've been on both the contractor and engineering side. My old contractor company liked to use threaded in certain cases and grooved in others, all about the $. It just depended on the floorplan layout size. I will say a lot of the time on tree systems we used threaded branch outlets. Also our labor force is from GA and SC where labor costs are significantly less than lets say TX or CA for example.

On the engineering side, our specifications use to read that 2" and smaller be schedule 40 because threading branch piping was just the way the world worked back in the day. Our specs now have options that allow Schedule 10 for 1 1/4" and larger when grooved.

In my experience I have never had a thread leak after the 200 psi pressure test has been approved. I have however had grooved couplings leak after the fact. This is typically on main piping where there were a lot of fittings or on the riser where it's harder to brace.

Another comparison to think about, (when there is a fire pump involved) we allow threaded reducer fittings but do not allow grooved reducer couplings. We've had cases on the contractor side where the reducer coupling failed and water dumped on a tissue paper manufacturer's storage facility. The blowout of the grooved coupling tends to be much greater than that of a threaded fitting.

Reply
Ben O'Regan link
7/30/2019 10:09:39 am

I can't imagine a contractor being happy about installing pipe over 2" diameter threaded. It's hard work doing up those larger connections compared to one bolt for a grooved coupling. Even though the materials might be cheaper the contractor is going to charge more for their trouble.

Another difference is rigidity - grooved couplings flex, threaded joints are stiffer, but that's usually not an issue at all.

Both systems are quite reliable. I have seen threaded connections rust out if they have been in service for a very long time (like 50 years). I don't know about grooved couplings, maybe they can deteriorate if they get old enough.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT