|
Looking for clarification on NFPA 101 Section 30.2.5.1.2, which provides an exemption for exit staircase remoteness. NFPA 14, however, requires a standpipe system in all exit staircases.
We are working on an 18-floor high-rise apartment building that has two exit staircases eligible for the remoteness exemption outlined in 30.2.5.1.2. I would like to install a standpipe riser in the exit access corridor leading to exit staircases instead of within the exit staircase, as NFPA 14 specifies. Is locating the hose valves in the corridor in-between allowed rather than within the exit enclosure?
8 Comments
Glenn Berger
7/16/2025 08:31:13 am
NFPA 14 Section 7.3.2.1 requires the connection to be provided at the stair landing for a Class I Standpipe System. Section 7.3.3.1 would cover the requirements for a Class II Standpipe System.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
7/16/2025 08:54:54 am
The scoping Code (e.g. IBC-2024) references the standpipe standard (e.g. NFPA 14-2024 Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems) per 905.2 (see REFERENCES below). If the scoping Code has a more stringent requirement than the referenced Standard, the scoping Code governs.
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
7/16/2025 08:55:19 am
REFERENCES
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
7/16/2025 08:55:50 am
REFERENCES
Reply
Joe
7/16/2025 08:55:11 am
Reflect on the purpose it is serving....FIREFIGHTERS. Need to be hooking up to the hose outlet within the protection of the stairwell that it affords prior to entering the fire floor to attack the fire.
Reply
Dan Wilder
7/16/2025 09:06:54 am
NFPA 14 does allow a Class 1 standpipe hose connection to be located between stairs if they are in the open connecting corridor and travel distances are met (14-24' 9.5.2.1.2 and also in previous editions as I have used this for a layout). The diagram shown does not look to comply with this allowance so the locations would default back to each enclosed stair.
Reply
Chad
7/16/2025 10:46:19 am
It doesn’t matter what 14 says you need to do what the fire department wants in this case. They have the authority to tell you to move it….
Reply
Jesse
7/16/2025 01:16:02 pm
I can't see this as being a viable option. I'd run it by the AHJ, but I wouldn't expect them to agree to it
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Oct '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
November 2025
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
