|
I am working in a warehouse with an existing ESFR system at the ceiling level. The new tenant is going to have manufacturing occupancies below, with no high-piled storage. We are utilizing the 2025 edition of NFPA 13.
There is a lot of ductwork being added to the spaces, and a question has come up regarding round and square ducts between 24 and 48" wide/diameter, and if protection is required below. For example, there is a series of (5) 42" Ø fabric ducts (Ductsox) running across a space. The top of the ductwork is approximately 6' below the deflectors of the 16.8K ESFR sprinklers overhead. When looking at section 14.2.10.3.4, I am interpreting the rules as follows - If a fixed obstruction is larger than 24" wide, and it isn't placed in accordance with table 14.2.10.2.1(a), it will require supplemental sprinklers regardless of the distance below the ESFR sprinklers. Obstructions over 48" will still always require supplemental sprinklers, and obstructions less than 24" won't need supplemental sprinklers if they can comply with one of the options 2-6 in 14.2.10.3.4. The confusion comes in with the reference to Table 14.2.10.2.1(a). Others in my office are interpreting the rules to mean that since the obstruction is greater than 31" below the deflectors, it would be acceptable to omit supplemental sprinklers underneath. I am of the belief that Table 14.2.10.2.1(a) doesn't apply at all since the obstruction is greater than 31" down from the deflectors - Since they don't comply with any of the other options in 14.2.10.3.4, supplemental sprinklers should be installed below obstructions between 24" and 48" wide when spaced more than 31" below the deflectors. What is your take on this? Are sprinklers required for obstructions between 24-48" wide when more than 31" below the deflectors? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments
Dan Wilder
10/13/2025 08:23:36 am
If you're using the 2025 edition and the area being protected falls under light and/or ordinary hazard, the obstruction rules of ESFR can be ignored per Section 14.2.6.1. You will need to comply with 10.2.8.2 instead.
Reply
Jesse
10/13/2025 08:34:38 am
De ja vu.... I had a very similar situation with ESFR at the ceiling but the overall occupancy being OH2. In my case, it was under 2019 NFPA 13 so I didn't have the option that Dan identifies. I agree with Dan in that the obstruction rules for ESFR aren't necessarily applicable, but 10.2.8.2 does apply
Reply
Chad
10/13/2025 10:14:30 am
Reply
COLIN LUSHER
10/13/2025 11:15:51 am
As others have said, the first question to ask is what is the occupancy. If it's light or Ordinary Hazard, then you can follow the obstruction rules of champter 10, and you won't need additional sprinklers under the ducts.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Oct '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
November 2025
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
