MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sprinklers in Obstructed Construction Also Required Above Sound Panels?

11/19/2020

4 Comments

 
We are sprinkler protecting a building with all I-Beams (W-type) and they are considered Obstructed Construction. The maximum beam depth is 20-inches. All my deflectors are 20" down from the deck. 

The owner now wants to put sound panels in each of the beam pockets which will take up about 85% of the space and will hang level to the finished floor but at least 9-inches up to 19-inches down from the deck because the steel slopes.

Would additional sprinklers be needed above these sound panels?

​​​​​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
4 Comments
Dan Wilder
11/19/2020 08:36:13 am

Interesting.....so here's my opinion

Obstructed construction - 1"-6" below up to 22"
-Sprinklers are 20" down (keeping the 1" deflector clearance)
-The design is in compliance

Panels added within obstructed construction. This may change if the structure is obstructed or unobstructed (you say 85% of the pocket)
-1"-12" below - You still comply with the highest panel being 9" down from the deck

Do the panels constitute a potential ceiling cloud?
-If yes and they don't trap the heat, the obstructed construction will and 1"-6" with max 22" is in compliance
-If yes and they do trap heat, the location 12" down is in compliance
-If no and these are just obstructions, see obstructed construction compliance rules at the top.

Reply
Franck
11/19/2020 10:57:10 am

As for Dan - Personal interpretation

Your description looks like a cloud ceiling. But some information is missing, to know if we can omit sprinklers above, such as:
- the maximum cloud ceiling height (should not exceed 20 ft if you want to omit sprinklers above it)
- the response time of the sprinklers that have been installed (should be quick response)
- maximum area of coverage from your sprinklers - refer to table 9.2.7.1 (NFPA 13 Edition 2019), as the maximum area covered by your sprinklers below the cloud ceiling depends on the minimum width dimension of your "clouds" and the opening width between clouds (which is expressed in terms of in. per ft of ceiling height).

Reply
Casey Milhorn
11/19/2020 12:43:02 pm

Well the 2 main things to consider are heat collection and spray pattern. If panels are recessed up in beam pockets, then do they really change anything about the situation if they weren't there at all?

Spray pattern - Definitely not, they are above the deflector of the heads.

Heat Collection - Maybe, but I would think it would only assist in heat collection and faster activation. I would think that you would have some cooler air become trapped possibly above the panel with more heat being transferred along the bottom of the panels and beams. I don't see how this could lead to "skipping" of sprinklers during activation. Should only help the process along.

But Dan has it pegged as far progressing through the rules if you had to justify it that way to anyone.

Reply
Franck
11/20/2020 09:35:03 am

Heat collection is fine if fire is located below the horizontal panels.
Depending on the size of the panels and the openings between 2 panels, we could have an adverse situation where the fire starts just below an opening (as it may be the case along the wall) and the heat plume is collecting above the panels and travel at the ceiling level without possibility to go down and activate the sprinklers (as the panels will act as a screen, which won't be the case if they were not there).

So yes, the obstruction is not a concern from the description.

But the need to provide sprinklers above the panels might be necessary depending on configuration.
(I really hate these cloud ceiling configurations...).

It is the same in a room with a false ceiling where tiles are missing : for reliability purposes it is normally recommended to replace the tiles as soon as possible, in particular if there is no sprinkler above the false ceiling.
Sprinkler above will activate and then push back the heat plume to the lower level where they will activate the sprinklers below the ceiling.
If no sprinkler above, heat is allowed to accumulate only inside the false ceiling area if the fire starts below the opening. And then the fire will grow before being controlled by lower sprinklers, resulting in more fire, smoke and water damages.

But I have to admit that I work for an insurance company (loss control), so I am always recommending more than sometimes necessary (reliability and probability for having the most adverse situation).

For a new situation, I would be quite strict.

By the way, I hope that the accoustic panels are not combustible or installed in an area where combustible dust or oil deposits may accumulate (otherwise you may have an additional issue).
I have seen these panels once installed in a metal working facility using lubricating oil for the equipment and the panels were fully soaked with oil after a few years...
Flash fire expected at the ceiling level in this configuration.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT