MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Sloped 13D Require 1,950 sqft or 2-Sprinkler Calc?

7/30/2024

6 Comments

 
For a single-family home with a 6 in 12 sloped ceiling (roof) that is a combustible wood structure.

Does this need a 1,950 sqft calculation due to the slope, or just two sprinklers as NFPA 13D requires?

Thanks in advance.

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
6 Comments
Pete H
7/30/2024 06:47:39 am

Has the architect already called this out as a 13D job in the code sheet?

If so, from NFPA 13D (2016 edition):
10.2.1 For each of the following situations, the number of sprinklers in the design area shall be all of the sprinklers within a compartment, up to a maximum of two sprinklers, that require the greatest demand:
(1) A flat, smooth, horizontal ceiling with no beams up to a maximum of 24 feet above the floor [you don't have this]
(2) A flat, horizontal, beamed ceiling with a maximum ceiling height of 24 ft. with beams up to 14 in. deep with pendent sprinklers under the beam. The compartment containing the beamed ceiling shall be a maximum of 600 square feet in area. The highest sprinkler in the compartment shall be above all openings from the compartment into any communicating spaces. [You don't have this].
(3) A smooth, flat, sloped ceiling with no beams up to a maximum slope of 8 in 12. The highest portion of the ceiling shall not be more than 24 feet above the floor. The highest sprinkler in the sloped portion of the ceiling shall be above all openings from the compartment containing the sloped ceiling into any communicating spaces. [YOU MIGHT HAVE THIS]
(4) A sloped ceiling with beams up to 14 in. deep with pendent sprinklers under the beams. The compartment containing the sloped beamed ceiling shall be a maximum of 600 sq. ft. in area. Th slope of the ceiling shall be between 2 in 12 and 8 in 12. The highest portion of the ceiling shall not be more than 24 ft. above the floor. The highest sprinkler in the sloped portion of the ceiling shall be above all openings from the compartment into any communicating spaces. [You also might have this]
(5) A sloped ceiling with beams of any depth with sidewall or pendent sprinklers in each pocket formed by the beams. The compartment containing the sloped, beamed ceiling shall be a maximum of 600 sq. ft. in area. The slope of the ceiling shall be between 2 in 12 and 8 in 12. The highest portion of the ceiling shall not be more than 24 ft. above the floor. [You also might have this].

--

And just make sure to also note:

--

10.2.3 For situations not meeting one of the conditions in 10.2.1, residential sprinklers listed for use in specific ceiling configurations shall be permitted to be used in accordance with their listing.

10.2.4 For situations not meeting one of the conditions in 10.2.1 and 10.2.3, the number of sprinklers in the design area shall be determined in consultation with the authority having jurisdiction as appropriate for the conditions.

Reply
Ivan Humberson
7/30/2024 08:20:13 am

Also, bear in mind that the language in NFPA 13D states that the design has to be the two sprinklers that require the greatest demand, NOT the two most remote sprinklers. Typically, with a sloped ceiling compartment, the greatest demand from two sprinklers in the compartment will be the highest, most remote sprinkler, and the lowest sprinkler nearest the water supply.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
7/30/2024 08:54:03 am

Pete H nailed it. Just make sure you aren't referring to NFPA 13 unless specifically directed by 13D. They are 2 completely different standards and 13D does a fairly good job of pointing you to 13 for certain situations.

Reply
Jesse
7/30/2024 10:35:44 am

What Pete said...

I'm also curious as to what code the architect referenced. Did the arc h intend this as a full 13 design?

Reply
danefre
7/30/2024 11:19:50 am

Calculation will be per NFPA 13D. If you do not meet the criteria for height (24ft peak) then you need AHJ approval for a more conservative design. We've had success calculating 4 heads instead of 2 for sloped ceilings that exceed 24ft in height. A-frame, log cabins etc. are all designed that way.

One thing I didn't see anyone mention is that the layout will heavily depend on the residential design guide of each manufacturer. They are NOT equivalent and have different maximum slopes. Consult the design guide for whichever manufacturer of residential sprinklers you choose.

Reply
Jack G
7/30/2024 12:09:41 pm

If under IBC code, there are at least a dozen conditions where 13d cannot be used, height increases, area increases egress increases , types of construction and more.
If IRC 13 d is allowed with less exceptions.
I agree with all of the above, but I would include 1 more sprinkler in the calculation, call that out, and I m sure the AHJ would not have a problem.
Review Meyer fire 13,13r, 13d and frequently discussed in 2020, 2022 similar situations.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Feb '26 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT