MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Shutdown CRAC Units with FM200 Activation?

7/8/2025

5 Comments

 
I have an IT room with FM-200 under the raised floor and a pre-action sprinkler system at the ceiling. Contractors are replacing CRAC units.

Should the CRAC units be connected to the suppression system to shutdown upon activation of the FM200 system?

I have done 2 days of research with no answer. Thanks in advance.


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
5 Comments
Pete H
7/8/2025 06:36:05 am

https://www.meyerfire.com/daily/shutdown-crac-unit-for-clean-agent-discharge

This was previously discussed on the forum here.

The useful part of NFPA 2001 (2018) that I see in this discussion was:

5.3 Enclosure
5.3.6 Other than the ventilation systems identified in 5.3.6.2, forced-air ventilating systems, including self-contained air recirculation systems, shall be shut down or closed automatically where their continued operation would adversely affect the performance of the fire extinguishing system or result in propagation of the fire.
5.3.6.1 If not shut down or closed automatically, the volume of the self-contained recirculating undampered ventilation system ducts and all components mounted below the the ceiling height of the protected space shall be considered as part of the total hazard volume when determining the quantity of agent.
5.3.6.2 Ventilation systems necessary to ensure safety shall not be required to be shut down upon activation of the fire suppression system. An extended agent discharge shall be provided to maintain the design concentration for the required duration of protection.

----

Short answer: yes, unless you want to consider their volume as part of the total hazard when determining the quantity of agent.

Reply
Mark Harris
7/8/2025 08:25:12 am

Halocarbon clean agents are heavier than air so if unit is shut down the agent will leak and cause a descending interface (minimum design concentration level height will drop). This is considered as part of the door fan test and ceiling height verses top of protected equipment.

As Pete notes if you do not shut down you will need to consider any additional volume. If the CRAC unit is in room and return is on unit (verses a plenum above ceiling) this may not be an impact. If unit stays on over time leakage will result in depleted concentration but the air movement keeps the concentration similar in entire room (verses the descending interface).

The Fire Suppression Systems Association (FSSA) just put out a white paper about this that suggests 15% more agent. Here is the link: https://www.fssa.net/fssa-white-papers. IT Managers fear their equipment overheating as much as fire so hence the interest from FSSA.

Reply
Glenn Berger
7/8/2025 08:31:47 am

The comment does not mention if power to the Data Equipment will be terminated upon fire suppression system activation. The comment also does not mention if the CRAC Unit only serves that one room. I have come across some clients who will require a "centralized" room for CRAC Units to serve multiple ITE spaces.

If power is terminated then shutting down the CRACs may be appropriate.

If the power is maintained, then shutting the CRACs will cause additional heat to build up in the space and not be the best solution.

Reply
Anthony
7/8/2025 08:59:40 am

The are should be air seals at the time of clean agent discharge for the appreciate amount of time per NFPA 2001.

However additional engineering controls need to be in place to lower the power on any computing in the area. With the cooling shut down the commuters WILL overheat and create an additional hazard.

The point of the FM-200 system is to reduce the failure of the whole system it would be pointless to have the physical computers(severs/racks ect) melt when a single unit fails.

Reply
Franck
7/8/2025 09:53:29 am

That’s a complex question as the FM200 is apparently only under the raised floor (preaction sprinkler for the room itself) and the concentration has been calculated on this quite limited volume only.

If your CRAC system is not impacting the volume under the raised floor, no need to stop it to maintain a correct concentration of gas. If the ventilation system is impacting the volume under the raised floor, the airflow needs to be stopped prior to the activation of the gas protection system, otherwise the gas will be diluted in the entire room and the minimum required concentration will never be maintained for 10 minutes.

This being said, from a fire prevention standpoint it would be good to stop it anyway, as it is sometimes a quite high ventilation system that may also have an impact on the efficiency of the sprinklers (activation at the ceiling may be impacted by high airflow velocities and sprinklers away from the fire area may activate, creating more water damages on equipment not involved by the fire).
But then, we are in the battle between sprinkler efficiency and technical requirements from IT people who want to keep the cooling for the equipment.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT