MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Run Fire Pump & Backup Simultaneously?

2/3/2022

10 Comments

 
We have a newly-installed electric (duty) fire pump, and a back-up diesel fire pump. 

Each pump has a 100% required flow capacity for the system (750 gpm each) for the building.

Is it OK to run the two pumps simultaneously during testing - which would result in a 200% flow?

The diesel pump is only intended to be used during power interruption/worst-case, but not with normal power online.

During testing, we release water in the test line (flow meter) - the pressure went down and triggered the cut-in pressure of both the electric and diesel pump which makes it run simultaneously (electric first, then the diesel a few seconds later).

Does this not have a water hammer effect on the system?

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Glenn Berger
2/3/2022 08:11:17 am

It is not okay to run both 100% pumps concurrently.

1) The suction pipe is not sized for the 200% of flow or worse yet, 150% of both pumps running.

2) The water supply may not be able to handle this flow.

3) The flow test header and meters (or hose outlets) are jnot sized for both pumps running.

4) etc. etc.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
2/3/2022 08:23:41 am

Agreed. Not a good idea. Each pump should be disabled during the other test run. Each should have a check valve, but still not a bad idea to shut off main control valve on discharge side of the non-testing pump as well.

Reply
Pete H
2/3/2022 08:28:02 am

I'm inclined to agree with Glenn, this does have elements that will potentially lead to issues where your system is not built for this massive 200% flow.

If I were try to make the argument for your case, I'd go with:

NFPA 20 (2016 Ed.)14.2.6.2.3.1 - Where simultaneous operation of multiple pumps is possible or required as part of a system design, the acceptance test shall include a flow test of all pumps operating simultaneously.

-

This states "possible or required". So it's not just parallel pumps in sequence, it's all pumps that can possibly run going simultaneously, backups included.

However, I'd note that the potential for water hammer or cavitation due to the system not being sized to handle 200% could definitely void whether this is possible.

If water hammer is your only concern, an anti surge pump start control valve could potentially mitigate that issue ( https://www.bermad.com/product/anti-surge-pump-start-control-valve/ https://blog.bermad.com/fire-protection/solving-water-hammer-with-innovative-deluge-valve )

But given the issues of suction pipe, water supply, and flow test header... I would not expect water hammer to be the only concern.

Please take with a grain of salt. All of the above is 5 minutes of research and musings without heavy focus.

Reply
Nick Devine
2/3/2022 08:30:42 am

For an arrangement like this, I believe each pump is required to be flow tested independently to confirm their individual performance. It may be necessary to isolate the pumps from each other while performing testing by either disconnecting from power or by closing valves. Sometimes easier said than done, depending on impairment procedures.

As for water hammer, it depends how the start/stop pressures are set for the pumps. We generally encourage the pump pressures to be set as follows:
Jockey (stop) = minimum static supply + net churn
Jockey (start) = - 10psi
Fire Pump (start) = - 5psi
Addition fire pump (start) = - 10psi
Setting the pressures in this manner will help to minimize potential water hammer issues.

Reply
SCHULMAN
2/3/2022 09:07:59 am

I am not sure why you would simulate a condition that would / should never happen in a properly installed system.

Reply
Jesse
2/3/2022 09:34:26 am

I think this falls under the "just because we can do it, doesn't mean we should". No, this isn't a good idea. Each pump should be tested independently.

First of all, the suction side of the pump arrangement would have been sized for one pump @ 150% of rated capacity. These are relatively small pumps at 750-gpm but there may be some concerns with the water supply being able to handle both as well.

Second, the test header would be sized for 750-gpm, not double that.

Several other concerns as well, but you get the idea.

Reply
Franck
2/3/2022 10:08:30 am

If the question is : is it a good idea to test both pumps simultaneously, then the answer has been assessed above and the answer is : no.
Unless each pump take suction from a different suction pipe and your test line allows to measure up to 300% of the nominal flow of your pump.
If the question is : did your test create problems ?
The answer is;: probably not.

Normally, as indicated above, it is a good practive to isolate one pump and start the other one. Then, when the test is done, isolate the one you have tested and test the second one. And don't forget to put everytrhing back in service at the end.

Now, come back to what happened.
Because you opened the test line, the pressure dropped quickly and activate both pumps quite simultaneously.
But what was the resulting maximum pressure ? The maximum pressure delievered by one pump.
When several pumps are operating, you add flow at the same pressure, not pressure.
And what was the flow ? The one that you could flow through your test line when it happens.
When it happens, I presume you had just started to open the flow test line, meaning that to flow that could go through you test line was something between 0 and 50% of the nominal flow of one pump.
100% maximum.
In that case, you can't flow more water than the size of your test lines enables you. This means, if both pumps have the same rating, that half of the flow was coming from one pump and half of the flow from the other.

If the flow measured throught your test line was 100% of the nominal flow of one pump, each pump was flowing 50%.
And the residual pressure was higher than the one with one pump operating (it should be, in fact, the pressure obtained at 50% flow).

To have waterhammer, you need a sudden increase of pressure in your system by providing too much flow with a limited "escape" for the water. This could happen if a fire pump starts at a too low pressure, and the pressure raise in a second from a very small pressure to the pressure delivered by the pump at churn (when only one sprinkler is opêrating, for example).


Reply
Joshua Freedman
2/3/2022 10:40:54 am

I am just agreeing with what everyone else said. I would be very worried about causing supply pipes to collapse with suction dropping as low as I would imagine it could get with both running.

Reply
Robert Hughes
2/3/2022 11:11:48 am

I'm no electrician, but I'd say your transfer switch should not allow the diesel pump to automatically kick on anyway without a power loss, either real or simulated.

Reply
Jack G
2/3/2022 04:45:44 pm

I disagree with Pete—- agree with Robert.
If one pump is backup……for main pump failure, and the design calculations are based on pressures available with ONE pump running, of course you cannot test both simultaneous.
I m sure the suction supply to both, is sized based on one pump running also.
Did you underbid the job? Having the test fail due to an inappropriate test is no way to make it up.
You can set the test header supply to feed to one header which will cut down your set up time.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Jan 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • About
    • Catalog
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT