How do you reconcile NFPA 30, 2021 Edition, Chapter 9 General Storage Requirements which reference NFPA 13, 2019 Edition, and vice versa?
NFPA 30 Section 9.6.1 says that the MAQ is doubled when the building is sprinklered per NFPA 13. NFPA 13 has the Extra Hazard Group 2 occupancy, which covers "substantial amounts of combustible or flammable liquids." The word substantial obviously makes it an engineering judgment for when EH2 should be applied. Hypothetical example: An existing warehouse is sprinklered per NFPA 13 to protect rack storage of Class I-IV commodities and cartoned group A plastics. The owner wants to store a Class III-B liquid in the existing warehouse on the storage racks. They would store more than the baseline MAQ but less than double the MAQ they get for having an NFPA 13 system. In my opinion, this storage arrangement would be out of the scope of NFPA 13, so the double MAQ for sprinklering per NFPA 13 would not apply. I'd require a protection scheme from Chapter 16 of NFPA 30. Do you disagree? What if they only wanted to store under the baseline MAQ amount? Would you require a protection scheme from Chapter 16 of NFPA 30? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
Glenn Berger
12/18/2024 08:13:37 am
I would de-conflict the standards in the following manner: (without validating the storage arrangement, etc.)
Reply
C
12/18/2024 08:24:19 am
I believe NPFA 30 allows for increases to the MAQ for a sprinklered building because of the additional protection provided with a sprinklered building versus non-sprinklered building.
Reply
Matt Hamilton
12/18/2024 08:30:37 am
NFPA 13 Chapter 26 (2019) or Chapter 27 (2022) Special Occupancy Requirements references back to NFPA 30 for the protection criteria of flammable and combustible liquids, so it circles you back to there. So, yes I would agree with you that you should reference NFPA 30 to come up with the correct design criteria.
Reply
Jesse
12/18/2024 11:40:53 am
I would select the design criteria and protection scheme from 30. 13 is more than just a means to find design criteria as it covers installation and aceptance. So 13 will come into play in the execution of the system designed to 30
Reply
Todd E Wyatt
12/18/2024 11:54:24 am
The referenced standards (e.g. NFPA 13 & NFPA 30) prescribe HOW an automatic sprinkler system (ASPS) is to be designed, installed, inspected, and maintained whereas the adopted (scoping) Code (e.g. IBC-2024 and IFC-2024) prescribe WHERE an ASPS is to be installed based on the building’s Occupancy Classification (OC) and other specialized requirements per Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems, 903.2 Where Required.
Reply
Todd Wyatt
12/20/2024 10:35:19 am
REFERENCES
Reply
Jose Figueroa
12/21/2024 01:59:56 pm
I would like to share an insightful analysis from an NFPA expert regarding the reconciliation of various standards.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop November '24 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
January 2025
PE PREP SERIES |