MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Re-Evaluate Supply with Replacement Fire Pump?

8/23/2024

9 Comments

 
We have a number of apartment buildings, 4-5 stories in height, with fire pumps serving the standpipes coming towards their end-of-life.

Is there a code requirement to re-evaluate the water supply when replacing a pump in a like-for-like scenario?

​Of course, this building has no existing fire protection records or placards to reference. Thanks!


Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
Anthony
8/23/2024 07:14:50 am

First off you need to have placards in order to be able to know if your water supply is sufficient. That'll be an expensive hydraulic survey.

You'll also need to review your pump testing reports if you're running 5% below your rated output you need to replace your pump if the pump is the reason for the failure. see NFPA 25 -2020 ed 8.3.7.2.3

Reply
Glenn Berger
8/23/2024 08:11:08 am

The question "Is there a code requirement to re-evaluate the water supply when replacing a pump in a like-for-like scenario?" --

There is an ethical requirement to always re-evaluate the water supply and that is why regularly schedule hydrant flow tests are required. This is not just when replacing fire pumps.

Reply
Jesse
8/23/2024 08:19:54 am

I'm not familiar with a code requirement to do so, but if I put my name on it you can bet I'm going to have an udated flow test.

Reply
Dan Wilder
8/23/2024 08:39:54 am

There is no word for word requirement for the entire pump (impellor, driver, controller) that I have seen, more inferred via sections like 25-23' below. At a liability standpoint, since this goes beyond component replacement, this would/should be a more detailed process.

4.1.7.1 "Where changes in the occupancy, hazard, water supply, storage commodity, storage arrangement, building modification, or other CONDITION THAT AFFECTS THE INSTALLATION CRITERIA of the system are identified, the property owner or designated representative shall promptly take steps to evaluate the adequacy of the installed system in order to protect the building or hazard in question."
8.6.1 "Whenever a component in a fire pump is adjusted, repaired, rebuilt, or replaced, the tests required to restore the system to service shall be performed in accordance with Table 8.6.1."
8.6.3 "Replacement parts shall be provided that will maintain the listing for the fire pump component assembly whenever possible."

However, as a fire life safety SYSTEM, confirmation of system performance should include a new water supply evaluation, the hydraulic requirements of the sprinkler/standpipe system beyond, and review of the existing/proposed new pump performance to ensure the system is capable of performing as originally intended.

Our AHJ's have an entire check list we have to provide when replacement of pumps including existing conditions from the city main into the building, hydraulic placard information and analysis to the fire pump curves-which include a current water supply, the old and the new fire pump curves, electrical requirements, new pump mounting details....and a very similar path for a temp fire pump installation while the pump is being replaced.

Other issue is this would potentially open the door for the AHJ to push for compliance with the current adopted codes and standards, not just back to the originally designed system.
Engage the owner, owner's insurance, and the AHJ so there are less surprises.

Reply
Jimmy
8/23/2024 09:23:20 am

As an AHJ my suggestion;

If the pumps "need evaluation" either by requirement or concern.

Like all older system they were designed for the water supply and the protection demand at that time.

Occupancies change - codes change - water supplies change.
If you know the pumps are in need of replacement,

>I would have the water supply tested for supply availability (hopefully it has improved)
>Verify the current occupancy flow demand required.
(this is often overlooked)

Make it easy on yourself, call the AHJ advise them you are about to reach out to fire protection contractors for bids in the mentioned concerns, the AHJ will at that time be aware and most probably give their input on a requirement or concern they will need addressed.

AHJ advise is free, estimates are also free and so are the flow test required for that estimate,..... make things easy on yourself.

Two things will happen, you will know the AHJ's opinion, and you will have the correct protection system installed.

Reply
Robert W Hughes
8/23/2024 01:00:23 pm

Hydrant Flow Tests cost $350 and up around here. FYI

Reply
Eric R
8/23/2024 09:43:14 am

You mention that the fire pump feeds standpipes. This leads me to assume the standpipes are automatic type, and if so, then they need to be flow-tested every 5 years per NFPA 25.

If this flow-test hasn't been done then this is a great way to solve two problems at once. First you can get the standpipe back in compliance with NFPA 25, and second you'll then be able to see what the existing water supply and fire pump boost output are and how far off you are from the standpipe design requirement. So if the water supply has degraded you can account for it when replacing the pump.

Also, field sketching the layout for a standpipe should be relatively simple considering how little piping there is compared to a sprinkler system. Even if the pump supplies both sprinklers and standpipes in almost all cases the automatic standpipe will be the most demanding.

Reply
DLS
8/23/2024 10:51:22 am

I believe that in order to properly ensure the performance of the pump, an updated water supply evaluation should be provided.

The water distribution system may have undergone extensive modifications that are outside the scope and control of the property owner and service contractor.

NFPA 25:8.6.2
NFPA 20 shall be consulted for the minimum requirements for design, installation, and acceptance testing.

NFPA 20:4.2.3.1
(10)Water supply information including the following flow test information, if applicable:
(a)Location and elevation of static and residual test gauge with relation to the elevation reference point
(b)Flow location
(c)Static pressure, psi (bar)
(d)Residual pressure, psi (bar)
(e)Flow, gpm (L/min)
(f)Date
(g)Time
(h)Name of person who conducted the test or supplied the information
(i)Other sources of water supply, with pressure or elevation

NFPA 20:14.5.1.4 Field Retest Results.
14.5.1.4.1
The field retest results shall be compared to the original pump performance as indicated by the fire pump manufacturer's original factory-certified test curve, whenever it is available.

14.5.1.4.2
The field retest results shall meet or exceed the performance characteristics as indicated on the pump nameplate, and the results shall be within the accuracy limits of field testing as stated elsewhere in this standard.

The key is if there is no available existing information for the original pump, you are going to have to provide the updated information.

Reply
Jack G
8/23/2024 12:18:12 pm

Of course you must meet or exceed the performance of the original test of the standpipe system.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Dec '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    SEARCH THE FORUM

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE Old Questions
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT