Quick-Response with Standard in Corridor?

4/22/2020

NFPA 13 (2019) Section 9.4.3.2 states that quick-response sprinklers shall not be mixed with any standard-response within a compartment unless some conditions apply.

9.4.3.2 Where quick-response sprinklers are installed, all sprinklers within a compartment shall be quick-response unless otherwise permitted in 9.4.3.3, 9.4.3.4, or 9.4.3.5.

Those conditions don't apply in my case and I know there's a definition of a compartment in 3.3.38.

However, from a practical standpoint if the compartment in question is a corridor, would you include the adjoining offices in the compartment? These offices are likely to have their doors open and are not on any magnetic door closing devices.

Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe

6 Comments

Wayne Ammons

4/22/2020 08:22:40 am

A compartment can have openings to the adjoining space up to 8 ft. wide as long as there is an 8" lintel from the ceiling and a single opening (such as a door) 36" wide without a lintel. Is your scenario different than what the definition describes?

Dan Wilder

4/22/2020 08:38:14 am

Change the sprinklers in the corridor to all be SR (match existing conditions I am assuming) unless the adjoining offices also do not comply with the definition of a compartment, then you are on the hook for the complete change out. This is allowed per 9.4.3.1(5).

Franck

4/22/2020 10:28:42 am

I won't be too much concerned in your case.

As indicated by Wayne, as long as you can consider that the wall above the door or other opening that is open can act as a draft curtain, you can have different type of sprinkler heads on either sides.
The issue with having standard response and quick response in the same area (same ceiling and same elevation) is that a fire below the standard response heads may operate first the quick response heads. This means that you will have more water damages as you will open more heads. In some adverse conditions, you could even overtax your sprinkler protection (room design method or very small design area of application with a mix of different sprinklers).
But this would be the same, up to a certain point, if you mix ordinary and high temperature sprinklers.

You will have the same type of issues when using ESFR in an area where you have standard sprinklers. In that case, it is good practice to provide a draft curtain of noncombustible construction to separate the two areas.

As Dan indicated, it is also common sense to use a single type of sprinkler, if possible. If you remove the problem, you find the solution :)

Mike

4/22/2020 03:35:18 pm

What is the occupancy? If it is light hazard, aren't QR heads required?

Daniel

4/23/2020 04:44:28 pm

It would normally be light hazard but it's ordinary based on the jurisdiction. The issue is the ones in the corridor need to be changed to QR out to deal with a ceiling pocket issue. The question is if the ones in the adjoining offices also need to be changed since typically people have the doors open. While I don't think they have to per the compartment definition, it may be practical to do so.

Mike

4/22/2020 08:37:40 pm

If the OP is talking from a practical standpoint, use QR response matching QR sprinklers already installed.

Avoids, conflict with plan check review comments, fitter confusions, head box spare sprinklers, listing and ordering.

Why would anyone go through the trouble of creating a separate sprinkler symbol, BOM, etc. for SR response sprinklers is beyond me. Think about listing, ordering, installation and head box. Lots of questions and comments on this board just show no practicality.

Leave a Reply.

Home
Our Cause

The Blog
The Forum

PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit
MeyerFire University

Pricing
Login
Support
Contact Us

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.
All text, images, and media Copyright © 2022 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

Quick-Response with Standard in Corridor?

Leave a Reply.

ALL-ACCESS

SUBSCRIBE

COMMUNITY

YOUR POST

PE EXAM

FILTERS

ARCHIVES

PE PREP SERIES