MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

PRVs for Static or Flowing Standpipe Over 175 psi?

1/25/2023

8 Comments

 
I have a plan reviewer that is not accepting our proposed design for a manual standpipe calculation.

The calculation shows a required pressure on the fire department pumper truck to be a minimum of 217 PSI.

It has been confirmed that the pumper truck can reach and/or exceed 250 PSI.

The AHJ is requesting that we increase the standpipe from 4-inch to 6-inch, which is not alleviating the higher pressures as we are still above 175 PSI.

This would be a first for me to have to install pressure reducing hose valves on a manual wet standpipe.

My understanding per NFPA-14 (2016) 7.2.3.2 is that this is only an issue when the static pressures on the systems exceed 175 PSI (city static is 113 PSI).

So in essence, we are advising the fire department pumper truck operator to dial his pump up to 217, but this wouldn't be static, as they would be flowing out of the hose valve(s), correct?

​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
8 Comments
Dan Wilder
1/25/2023 07:46:57 am

This got long...sorry

TL:DR - You are correct by the section specific to static conditions. Talk to the reviewer about a middle ground but make sure you're not fighting established codes/standards.

So, NFPA 1901 Section 16.2.3 shows what the fire department apparatus are to provide when equipped with a fire pump (just for future reference) so I am assuming the pumper truck in question is rated to provide at least 1500 or 2000 GPM (no mention on if this is a 750 or 1000 GPM demand). Most AHJ's only allow 150PSI without an appeal process (in my area at least).

By the letter of NFPA, you are correct in that the section specifically references a static condition requirement for a need for a pressure reducing hose valve. Is there language in the fire code requiring a maximum PSI to be used or the ability to use the available apparatus open to interpretation?

NFPA 13e Section 6.2.3 says the standpipes "should be charged to give the desired working pressure on the standpipe being used." i.e. static pressure....but...

Section 6.2.4.2 - Pump discharge pressure in excess of 200 psi (13.8 bar) should not be used unless the standpipe system has been designed to withstand higher pressures as indicated on the sign at the fire department connection.

The assumption that there is always water flow to avoid a static condition is unlikely due to initial staging and then repositioning efforts by a responding crew(s) and no crew wants to go into a fire without a charged line ready and available not to mention the lower floors will always have higher pressures. Now, the driver engineer should be monitoring the pump to adjust for the needs of the crews on the floors but if the pump is dialed in at 217PSI at whatever flow is needed and one or more crews shuts down a nozzle, that 217 just went up.

I have had projects like this in the past where signage at the FDC and warning signage at the hose valves for higher than 175PSI working pressures allowed the design & install. I would have the conversation with the reviewer and maybe their boss and/or the Fire Marshall. Maybe a middle ground where you provide 6" (as needed) pipe to bring the required PSI down as much as possible and use standard hose valves...it beats PRV's and the associated express drains.

There is a little precedent for your situation as shown below.

https://community.nfsa.org/blogs/vincent-powers/2021/08/05/the-automatic-truth-about-manual-wet-standpipes

Reply
Anthony
1/25/2023 08:18:17 am

In defense of the AHJ and maybe common sense I think it would be obvious that the hose wouldn't be open the entire time the fire truck is providing supplemental pressure and flow to the standpipe system. There will be instance of static conditions in that system and on that fire hose. If the AHJ is the fire marshal it will their people that will have to deal with the over pressure in the system in an emergency, just as a reminder of their point of view.

Alternatively if the view is that the sprinkler system will be exposed to over pressure, the system is tested at 200 PSI (higher than the rated 175 psi operational pressure) or 50 psi over operational pressures. So test your sprinkler systems at 267 psi for 2 hours. I think that would make for a reasonable argument that the system is able to handle temporary fluctuations in pressure in testing and emergency conditions.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
1/25/2023 08:26:19 am

Dan nailed it again. I would definitely ask what their departmental procedure is when hooking up to a manual wet standpipe. That should help you find some middle ground as Dan says. I almost always plan on 6" over to the split of the two standpipes, unless I'm dealing with a 4 story hotel/motel/apartment with a small foot print. The assumption is that the engineer will deliver the amount of supply needed whether on the first floor or the top floor. I think PRVs in a manual wet standpipe system is a BAD idea. As they say, keep it simple. I've never been a fire fighter, but I would rather deal with 200 psi then have to deal with 75 psi because of a faulty or wrongly adjusted PRV in a life or death situation.

Reply
Eric R
1/25/2023 09:28:40 am

This is throwing up some pretty big red flags for me.

If the demand required is 217 you would have to assume that valves will be opened and closed without instant pressure correction at the pumper truck, and that static pressures on the system would be that or higher at-least temporarily.


"7.8.1.2.1-The pressure required at the fire department connection for manual standpipes shall not exceed the working pressure of the system components of the standpipe system or sprinkler system when the system is a combined system." Was added in the 2019 edition but should be self-evident regardless of edition adoption.

I'm with the AHJ here that the layout should be re-arranged to get the PSI down to 175.

I'd also really want to know more about this building arrangement where swapping to 6" pipe doesn't significantly drop the required pressure.

Reply
Jonathan
1/25/2023 10:15:40 am

I recommend you first reach out to and consult with the local fire department / AHJ to better understand their concerns. Start by learning about their department standpipe standard operating procedures (SOPs). It may be as simple as a procedural issue, or just something the department / AHJ is used to. The engine/pumper is going to be more than capable of meeting the pressure demand. What type of connection is the fire department / AHJ requesting (LDH, 2.5" Siamese, etc.)? With the limited information provided, it is difficult to fully understand their concerns. Their concern may be charging a single supply line at 217PSI vs multiple supply lines at lower PSI. Seeing such high-pressure requirements may raise a red flag, because it is potentially exposing firefighters on the fireground to the dangers if a failure were to occur. Yes, increasing the standpipe from 4inch to 6inch does not eliminate the pressures exceeding 175PSI. However, it reduces the overall working pressure in the event of a failure. Another concern the local jurisdiction may have is internal obstructions. Depending on the area, a number of factors could introduce foreign objects into the system (rocks, trash, pipe corrosion, etc.). A 6inch standpipe will serve better mitigating those obstructions than a 4inch. Just some thoughts. Best of luck!

Reply
Jonathan Joseph
1/25/2023 12:16:07 pm

Since your static is 115, no pressure reducing valves is necessary. To upsize your main feed is pointless unless the "design" needing more flow (GPM) due to your inside hose allowance, calculated friction loss and elevation.

Just curious, how many standpipes are on this system that you would need 217 flowing to reach your 100 psi residual pressure and 250 GPM at your most remote hose valves? There must be a lot of friction in your main to raise this issue to upsizing your main and needing to cause more flow than what the maximum 175psi that is required at the FDC just like Eric stated.

Reply
Danefre
1/25/2023 12:27:05 pm

Are you dealing with a partially existing standpipe?

I have yet to run into this with a new system. We always make it work even it means upsizing or splitting the standpipe feed early. Split that 1000gpm early.

At the absolute limit of a manual standpipe you would be losing 35ish psi due to elevation. Not sure if your state defines high rises differently than IBC.

I set up a test calc and with 3 hose valves at 80ft and 1 at 70ft with 1000ft of 6" between them and the demand calc comes in at 149psi at the FDC. Unless you're exceeding these conditions, your problem is the 4". Curious to see your calc.

Reply
Casey Milhorn
1/25/2023 03:20:04 pm

Great question and some great responses. Just to add to my previous thoughts, almost all industry standard couplings, pipe, fittings, hose valves, etc. are listed to 300 psi or above. Typically butterfly valves are listed to 250 psi. Technically if the pumper truck CAN pump at 250 psi @750 gpm, and you need 217 psi total @ 750 gpm, then you are correct and technically it should work. But as others have said, usually a small amount of 6" before the split, or even 6" for the horizontal runs will reduce friction loss tremendously. 500 gpm through 5 or 6 floors of 4" pipe isn't that big of a deal. It's when you start shoving 750 gpm or 1000 gpm through 4" that it becomes a problem. Also, make sure you aren't trying to balance the additional hose valves. They should be plugged in as a flat 250 gpm, not as an orifice that is being balanced in the system.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top ​Feb 2023 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A117.1
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    ICC-500
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is an International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2023 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • THE TOOLKIT
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR*
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER*
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER*
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR*
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'22)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER*
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • SYSTEM ESTIMATOR*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER STORAGE*
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ABOUT
    • CATALOG
    • CONTENT LIBRARY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • THE CAUSE
    • ABOUT US
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT