MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About
Picture
A FORUM FOR FIRE PROTECTION QUESTIONS & PE EXAM PROBLEMS | SUBSCRIBE NOW

Pressure Reducing Valves - Friction Loss in Calcs

5/17/2019

9 Comments

 
Pressure Reducing Valve are commonly used to prevent excess pressure upon systems when supplies exceed the NFPA limit of 175 psi.

There has been much discussion regarding the 'application' of these valves when hydraulic calculations are being provided to the discharge of the PRV and determining the pressure margin available.

Currently, we have been instructed to calculate the system back to the PRV, use the PRV's friction loss calculator to determine friction loss through the valve and subtract that from the outlet setting to establish outlet pressure. This is then used as the available pressure at the outlet; minus the demand and you're left with the margin.

I'm not sure that I agree that the valves 'friction' loss need to be considered unless you are at a point where the PRV can no longer provide the set pressure (when the supply is unable to provide sufficient inlet pressure to overcome the internal friction loss).

Are there any 'papers' written for direction or other sources anyone might recommend?

Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
9 Comments
FIREPE25
5/17/2019 10:22:54 am

We see these calculated incorrectly very often. You are absolutely correct about the friction loss. If the valve is set for 150PSI and you have 190PSI before the valve the friction loss will be built in. The only time the friction loss is needed is when the valve is wide open (assuming we are talking about pilot operated PRV). This gets a bit tricky if the valve is set for 150PSI and you have 155PSI before the valve. We use SprinkCAD and we calculate them using the following steps. This may be a bit confusing but i will do my best.

1) Run a calculation from the remote area back to the source.

2) Insert a standpipe demand node at the PRV.

3) Run a separate calculation using the standpipe demand node set at the required flow. The pressure needs to be set at whatever makes the safety factor zero. This will show you what you have for pressure before the PRV at your required flow.

4) You then can look at your original calculation and determine what pressure is required at the PRV location and compare it to what you actually have for pressure before the PRV and what you plan on setting the PRV for.

*If your pressure available before the PRV is less than the PRV is set for then you can run a normal calculation all the way back to the source with the friction loss through a wide open PRV at the location of the valve.*

Reply
PETE
5/17/2019 10:41:07 am

The PRV will output an entirely new water supply curve based on it's friction loss curve. One way to consider the losses is to plot the new water supply points based on the inlet water supply adjusted for friction loss at various points, and input that as your water supply. The other way is to add a set friction loss at your flow for each calculation. Either way is acceptable, but you can't just ignore it. The PRV will have friction loss even when the supply pressure is lower than the outlet pressure setting. Look at p.11 of this Cla-Val PRV. https://www.cla-val.com/documents/Technical%20Manuals/TM-90-21.pdf

Also consider that PRVs have a minimum flow for the diameter of the valve, before which the PRV won't flow at all. The scenario is something like a pump with an 8" discharge has an 8" PRV with a 390 gpm minimum flow. You want to calculate a light hazard system (0.1 gpm/ft^2 x 1500 ft^2 + 100) at 250 gpm. At 250 gpm, you have not reached the minimum. So your PRV must include a smaller diameter bypass (say 2") piped in parallel that has a smaller diameter 2" PRV on it, to accommodate lower flow rates. An alternative arrangement would be to put PRVs on the individual risers or riser manifolds, because most pipe and fittings are UL listed for up to 300 psi.

Reply
FIREPE25
5/17/2019 10:52:38 am

I think I agree! In most instance the pressure after a pilot operated PRV will be a flat curve at whatever the set point is until the flow gets so large that the water pressure deteriorates to less than what the valve is set at.

Reply
M Akram M Ibrahim
6/20/2020 01:33:45 pm

Yes,if we see curve of inlet verses outlet pressure setting .though globe valve pressure drop is not more than 10 psi

Clifford Schulze
5/17/2019 04:20:44 pm

Be very careful when using the 2 1/2" brass pressure regulating valves. The pressure loss across those, especially at the higher flows, is substantial.

Reply
Nimal Tissa Wijetunga
5/18/2019 12:42:12 pm

PRVs are highly susceptible to failure and high maintenance requirements and therefore not recommended to utilize in Fire Protection Systems due to reliability considerations.

Reply
PETE
5/18/2019 02:23:59 pm

^^Citation needed. There are UL listed and FM approved PRVs on the market. Backflow preventers are high maintenance also, but they're required in some jurisfictions invariably.

Reply
Mike
5/19/2019 01:22:47 am

When installed correctly and maintained per NFPA 25, these valves are highly reliable. Most often if they fail, they were set incorrectly or not maintained.

Reply
Mike
5/19/2019 01:30:17 am

I think the delineation needs to be made between a pressure reducing valve and pressure regulating valve.

The pilot operating regulating valves are designed to deilver a constant pressure on all flows within it's range. Therefore, i don't think friction loss is a factor.

Friction loss would be determined as a fixed flow back to the source from the PRV as mentioned.

I think two curves is the correct way as stated FIREPE25.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jump to: Daily Posts
    Jump to: PE Problems
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    Free Signup

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    Community

    Thank You to Our Top
    ​October '20 Contributors!
    1. SK
    2. Franck
    3. Dan W.
    4. Jonathan ​5. Casey M.
    6. Sean
    7. Colin L.
    8. Mike
    9. Jonathan J
    ​10. Daniel G.


    Your Post

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    The Toolkit

    Sprinkler Designer or Engineer?
    ​
    ​Get all of our tools, including the Sprinkler Database, Friction Loss Calculator, Fire Pump Analyzer and more:
    Picture
    FREE 30-DAY TRIAL
    GET THE TOOLKIT

    Filters

    All
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    Daily Discussion
    Design Documents
    Explosion Protection & Prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable & Combustible LIquids
    FM Global
    Human Behavior
    IBC
    IFC
    Information Sources For Analysis
    IRC
    Means Of Egress
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 12
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 92
    NICET
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management Systems
    Special Hazard Systems
    Types Of Analysis
    UFC 3 600 01
    UFC 3-600-01
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    June 2015


    Daily
    Daily discussions are open-ended fire protection, fire alarm, and life safety questions submitted anonymously for the benefit of sharing expertise and learning from other perspectives. Anyone can submit a question here:
    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    Exam Prep

    Picture
    2020 PE Prep Guide​
    ​(Available Now!)
    Picture
    PE Prep Series
    ​(Available Now!)
    2020 PE Prep Series
    Current Leaderboard
    ​(Click to enlarge)
    Fire Protection PE Exam Prep

    PE Problems
    ​Visit July-October for daily Fire Protection PE Exam sample questions.

    Solutions are posted the day after posting.

    Comment with your solutions, questions or clarifications.

    Please note that questions posted are unofficial and in accordance with NCEES rules are intended to be similar to actual exam questions, not actual exam questions themselves.

    RSS Feed

Home - About - Blog - Contact - Exam Prep - Store
Picture
Copyright © 2020 MeyerFire, LLC
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author shown and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a commission for orders placed elsewhere.
  • Blog
  • Daily
  • Exam Prep
    • CFPS Tools
    • NICET Tools
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Problems
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE Prep Series
  • TOOLS
    • TOOLKIT (FREE TRIAL)
    • *TOOLKIT (PURCHASE)
    • SUBMIT AN IDEA
    • BACKFLOW DATABASE*
    • CLEAN AGENT ESTIMATOR
    • CLOUD CEILING CALCULATOR
    • DOMESTIC DEMAND
    • FIRE PUMP ANALYZER
    • FIRE PUMP DATABASE*
    • FIRE FLOW CALCULATOR*
    • FRICTION LOSS CALCULATOR
    • HANGER SPACER
    • IBC TRANSLATOR*
    • K-FACTOR SELECTOR
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('19 ONLY)
    • NFPA 13 EDITION TRANSLATOR ('99-'19)*
    • LIQUIDS ANALYZER*
    • OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR
    • OBSTRUCTIONS AGAINST WALL*
    • PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS
    • REMOTE AREA ANALYZER
    • QUICK RESPONSE AREA REDUCTION
    • SPRINKLER DATABASE*
    • SPRINKLER FLOW*
    • TEST & DRAIN CALCULATOR
    • THRUST BLOCK CALCULATOR
    • TRAPEZE CALCULATOR
    • UNIT CONVERTER
    • VOLUME & COMPRESSOR CALCULATOR
    • WATER SUPPLY (US)
    • WATER SUPPLY (METRIC)
  • CODE CALLS
  • LOGIN
  • STORE
  • About