MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Ordinary Temp. Sprinklers Adjacent to Diffuser?

2/14/2020

10 Comments

 
Are others experiencing AHJ's requiring that sprinklers placed in ceiling tiles directly adjacent to HVAC ceiling tile diffusers either be moved to at least 2'-6" away or replaced with intermediate-temperature rated sprinklers?

I am primarily referring to the vane style horizontal discharge diffusers you see in almost every office building, typically with an ordinary-temperature rated sprinkler in the center of an adjacent tile, only 1 ft. away.

Referencing NFPA 13, 2019 Edition, A.8.3.2.5: A diffuser in ceiling sheathing labeled by the manufacturer as "horizontal discharge" has directional vanes to move air further along the ceiling, and sprinklers located within the 2 ft. 6 in. (750 mm) radius should have an intermediate-temperature rating.

​​​​​Posted anonymously for discussion. Discuss This | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
10 Comments
Bruce Seiler
2/14/2020 10:32:54 am

If the maximum air being discharged from the supply diffuser is not greater than 100 F, you don't have to consider the distance to the sprinkler head. This requirement only applies when the normal air being discharged exceeds 100 F.

Reply
Keith Moore
11/1/2022 09:07:44 pm

The typical furnace produces temperature at the diffuser of 110 degrees or more, so they must meet the distance requirement.

Reply
Sean
2/14/2020 11:00:03 am

Note the language in the code "should".

Reply
Lee
2/14/2020 11:14:49 am

The 100-degree threshold on 8.3.2.5(9) (in the 2016) is in reference to proximity to ducts. In my opinion, the direction of Table 8.3.2.5(a) stands, as reinforced by the Annex commentary. A proposal to the NFPA Committee was specifically presented to consider horizontal-discharge ceiling diffusers as downward-discharging, but that proposal was rejected. I just make them all intermediate-temperature throughout (I personally like the 175 over the 200), as allowed in NFPA #13.

Reply
Jon Sullivan
2/14/2020 11:41:00 am

I had an inspector flag this recently.

NFPA 13-19 9.4.2.5 states, unless high-temp sprinklers are provided throughout the compartment you need to comply with their provisions for providing other than ordinary temperature sprinklers.

In this case if you are within 2'-6" of a horizontal diffuser at the same plane, the sprinklers should be intermediate.

Lee's approach is good, prevents any accidental ordinary temp installation where not allowed.

I'd also engage your HVAC contractor/designer early. Typically 2'-6" is only one and a half tiles over, and it is easy coordination.

Reply
Lee
2/14/2020 12:01:48 pm

I know it is arguable, in terms of ceiling temperature, but in my opinion that is the correct path, or the Committee wouldn’t have rejected calling them downward-discharging. (According to Russ Fleming in NFSA Tech Notes #212, June 14, 2011, it was Proposal 13-127 in the 2009 Revision Cycle, and public comment period resulted in A.8.3.2.5.) I have also been told that while the HVAC system may not be designed to discharge higher than 100-degrees F, there are conditions where it could. I make them all intermediate, since diffusers could shift location in the field, so my drawings may not remain correct, and I don’t want my fitter having to stay on top of it. If there’s solid argument in the other direction, I’d sure be open to it.

Reply
Wayne Ammons
2/14/2020 01:31:33 pm

I probably could have been a little more clear when I submitted this question. It was not for interpretation of the standard, but to get a sense of whether or not others across the industry are running into this particular matter and how it is being addressed. In this particular case, the HVAC engineer confirmed that the RTU's are expected to reach temperatures of up to 115°F while in heating mode. The standard allows the use of ordinary or intermediate-temperature rated sprinklers throughout buildings, so I agree with Lee, the decision to go ahead and install intermediate-temperature rated sprinklers throughout an office building seems the safest bet, otherwise there would have to be some extra effort put into confirming HVAC output temperatures and/or coordination to ensure the required distances are met. Hopefully, over the life of the building as modifications are made and add/relocates occur, other companies are aware of the reasoning behind all the yellow or green bulbs and don't arbitrarily put in red...

Jon Sullivan
2/18/2020 09:39:58 am

To the HVAC system comment. Currently, you'll see HVAC designs limiting the heating discharge temperature to +15F over space temperature. The logic behind this is to promote better ventilation by reducing air stratification. By keeping the temperature within this range the code also allows you to reduce the ventilation rate, which on a cold day could add up to some nice energy savings. However, with the closer air/room temperature difference, more air is needed to heat, so maybe it's a wash.

Jessica Lutz
2/24/2020 01:29:11 pm

A common practice nowadays is to install Intermediate temp. heads throughout.

NFPA 13 allows this with restrictions...check with your AHJ first.

Reply
Joshua
3/8/2020 05:41:24 pm

My take as an HVAC Engineer and FP designer. If the heating is electric resistance then the discharge can be designed for less than 100 degrees, generally with ease. So I coordinate that my HVAC engineer provide around 90 degrees and then I can use ordinary temperature sprinklers. Near 100 degree designs waste heating energy because the supply air stratifies and works slowly into the space for comfort.

If the heating is from hot water then a control valve could be stuck open and greater than 100 may develop though unintended, so there I use intermediate temperature rated sprinklers.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top May '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    NFPA 409
    NFPA 415
    NFPA 45
    NFPA 495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • PRICING
    • SOFTWARE & TRAINING
    • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT