MeyerFire
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT
Picture

Need Auto. Standpipes when Fire Pump Provided?

10/22/2025

7 Comments

 
I'm working with a not-so-good flow test on a project that will require a pump because of the flow test.

Where this is getting in the muck is the test flow rate being 712 gpm. The hydrant is about 565 feet from the entry and about 4 feet below finished floor elevation.

This is a 5-story, light hazard with 2 standpipes, so the standpipe demand is 750 gpm.

Flow test had 44 psi static and 34 psi residual with a 0.9 coefficient through the 2.5" outlet. As you know this is a 750 gpm system demand.

The person over me is adamant that we not separate the sprinkler and standpipe systems out - sprinklers and then standpipe - by code when it comes to fire pumps. Even though this is a
low-rise building and all we are technically concerned with is an automatic sprinkler system, and if the responding FD has an engine/pumper, the manual standpipe is in their realm.

The argument is that they don't want a "partially automatic system" on any project; if a fire pump is to be provided for the project, they insist that the standpipe system connected to it must also be automatic.

Back to the 750 gpm thing. At 34 psi, we have 712 gpm, obviously. The thing here is putting a 111 psi, 750 gpm pump on. They're  concerned with the NPSH of the pump and not the duty point or the 150% rated test goals.

(1) When a fire pump is provided to meet the needs of the sprinkler system, are the standpipes required to be automatic?

(2) Is there a requirement here for automatic standpipes that I'm missing? The local jurisdiction has no amendments that affect standpipe requirements different than the model IBC.

(3) Is an automatic standpipe here even achievable given the limits of the water supply, or are we causing more issues in testing down the road?

If it was local, the FMs have already told me that's close enough and we will make up any flow from our trucks. What am I missing here?

I understand clearly that at 20 psi the flow is 1,124 gpm. That's not what I'm trying to accomplish. I am attempting to make the combined system fully automatic per policy at 750 gpm and I'm told it's all good to go.

Help a man at wit's end out here.


TLDR: How would you approach manual vs. automatic standpipes when a fire pump is provided for a 5-story sprinkler system, but a 750 gpm pump could overtax the water supply?

Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
Dan Wilder link
10/22/2025 07:58:49 am

My approach would be an automatic sprinkler system with the pump as needed, interconnected standpipes but designed for Manual and using the local AHJ pumper truck capabilities for that water supply. That is a typical SOP for design of buildings with floors in the 30'-75' realm based on available water supply. Signage on the FDC will be key for the responding pumper truck and engineer.

1 - No, they are separate designs and the connection between the two is typically setup where the sprinkler system is automatic, the standpipe can be automatic or manual. There are some IFC provisions that require an Automatic standpipe and are clear - Assemblies >1000, Underground buildings and some others...these all state "Automatic"

2 - No, requirements for Automatic provided you are in compliance with the IFC (2021 ref.) 905.2 - 905.11. In your case, 905.3.1 (1) Four or more stories above grade plane, 905.3.1(2) Floor level of the highest story is located more than 30 feet above the lowest level of the fire department vehicle access and using the Exception (1) to allow Class 1 is the likely path. Nowhere is the term "Automatic" used in reference to a standpipe requirement (using the provided info).

3 - Most likely....I don't see the full 150% being achievable/ available at 20 PSI...take into account losses from pipe and fittings and you'll likely drop below that 20 PSI threshold and possible approach the 3PSI or lower. If the full 150% cannot be made, you can use the provision in NFPA 20 (2019) 14.2.6.3.4.1 for the acceptance, if the local AHJ allows.

Reply
Glenn Berger
10/22/2025 08:15:17 am

1) Standpipe System can be Manual Wet Class I type iaw NFPA 14. It does not matter that the building is provided with fire sprinkler system(s).

2) The code requirement is that standpipes are required. The exact system type needs to be developed based on locality issues.

3) Automatic standpipes can be achieved. May need water storage tank to be included in the design.

Reply
Anthony
10/22/2025 08:45:41 am


(1) No this is why you have an FDC let the pumper truck feed the manual system-- see the back of NFAP 14 it has design criteria when you cant get truck pump curves

(2) None that I'm seeing

(3) I'm worried you wont pas your flow test on commissioning you should be required to have a hydrant within 100 ft of the FDC unless AHJ allows otherwise. (can anyone else confirm?)

Reply
Casey Milhorn
10/22/2025 08:50:00 am

Dan and Glenn nailed it. The only thing I would add is to make sure the path from the FDC(s) to the hose valves are sized no smaller than 4", but should be sized larger if required by a manual standpipe calculation, using the responding fire departments fire pumper supply information. Remember to provide signage at the FDC that signifies a manual standpipe and the required pressure. IF the fire department can and will energize the system to more than 175 psi, make sure you take that into account for your materials used in the systems. It's not a bad strategy to keep your required static psi to 175 psi in your manual standpipe calcs, and then to signify that on your signage. This avoids the 175 issue and should reduce your exposure if the fire department supplied excess pressure and has a failure. BUT, if the fire department says they will pump to over 175 psi regardless of signage as their SOP, I would consider this.

Reply
Donnie
10/22/2025 11:28:23 am

Yes, manual standpipes are allowed where the building is fully sprinkled. The fire truck pumper can then satisfy the pressure needed at the top most remote outlet of 100psi. If you need more bpm, open another hose outlet to get 750 combined total flow. Should be easy.

Reply
Jerry Clark
10/22/2025 01:32:22 pm

For a 5-story light hazard building under the model IBC (without local amendments), standpipe systems are required but are allowed to be manual wet. NFPA 14 and IBC typically require automatic standpipes only for high-rise buildings over 75 feet or special conditions. Your building's standpipes do NOT need to be automatic simply because a fire pump is installed for sprinklers.

Since your local jurisdiction has no amendments altering standpipe rules, no hidden requirement forces the standpipes to be automatic if a fire pump is added for sprinklers. Manual wet standpipes supplemented by the fire department's pumpers are code-compliant and standard practice.

The available supply showing 34 psi residual at 712 gpm is marginal for a 750 gpm combined demand system with a fire pump rated at 111 psi. Attempting to make the standpipe system fully automatic under these conditions can lead to pump NPSH problems, test difficulties, and potential system operational issues.

Reply
Jack G
10/22/2025 05:42:13 pm

Both NFPA 14 and the IBC would allow a manual wet standpipe system here. Calculation would be from a hydrant to a pumper truck thru the fdc to the standpipe system usually calculated with the flow( here 750 gpm) at 150 psi. The standpipes shall be a minimum of 4 inch. Some times if the hydrant is too far away to calculate 100 psi with the 150 fire department pressure the AHJ will allow what the max pressure the fire department can provide.
A fire pump can also connect to the manual standpipe and sized only for the sprinkler system. ( Fire dept provides the standpipe flow and pressure)
In this case I would size the pump for 120% of the calculated sprinkler demand at a pressure that included the elevation loss plus the friction loss minus the water mains pressure at the flow.
I ve used a 400 gpm 90 psi pump for the sprinklers. I ve found this to be the best economical size.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    SUBMIT A QUESTION
    Picture
    Why Sponsor?

    ALL-ACCESS

    Picture
    GET ALL OUR TOOLS

    SUBSCRIBE

    Subscribe and learn something new each day:
    I'm Interested In:

    COMMUNITY

    Top Nov '25 Contributors
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    SEE LEADERBOARD

    YOUR POST

    SUBMIT A QUESTION

    PE EXAM

    Get 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
    SIGN ME UP!

    FILTERS

    All
    A1171
    ABA
    ADA
    ASCE 7
    ASME A17.1
    ASTM E1354
    Blog Thread
    Daily Discussion
    Design-documents
    EN 12259-1
    EN 12845
    Explosion Protection
    Explosion-protection-prevention
    Fire Detection And Alarm Systems
    Fire Dynamics
    Flammable And Combustible Liquids
    Flammable-combustible-liquids
    FM Global
    Human-behavior
    IBC
    ICC 500
    IEBC
    IFC
    IMC
    IPC
    IRC
    ISO
    Means Of Egress
    NBC
    NFPA 1
    NFPA 10
    NFPA 101
    NFPA 11
    NFPA 110
    NFPA 1142
    NFPA 1221
    NFPA 13
    NFPA 13D
    NFPA 13R
    NFPA 14
    NFPA 15
    NFPA 16
    NFPA 17A
    NFPA 20
    NFPA 2001
    NFPA 214
    NFPA 22
    NFPA 220
    NFPA 24
    NFPA 241
    NFPA 25
    NFPA 291
    NFPA 30
    NFPA 307
    NFPA 30B
    NFPA 31
    NFPA 33
    NFPA 37
    NFPA 400
    Nfpa-409
    Nfpa-415
    Nfpa-45
    Nfpa-495
    NFPA 497
    NFPA 5000
    NFPA 502
    NFPA 54
    NFPA 55
    NFPA 654
    NFPA 68
    NFPA 70
    NFPA 701
    NFPA 72
    NFPA 75
    NFPA 770
    NFPA 82
    NFPA 850
    NFPA 855
    NFPA 90A
    NFPA 92
    NFPA 96
    NICET
    OBC
    OSHA
    Passive Building Systems
    PE Prep Guide
    PE Prep Series
    PE Sample Problems
    Poll
    Smoke Management
    Special Hazard Systems
    UFC 3-600-01
    UFC 4-021-01
    UFC 4-211-01
    UPC
    Updates
    Water Based Fire Suppression
    Weekly Exams


    ARCHIVES

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016


    PE PREP SERIES

    SEE LEADERBOARD

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Home
Our Cause
The Blog
The Forum
PE Exam Prep
The Toolkit

MeyerFire University
​Pricing
Login
​Support
Contact Us
Picture

MeyerFire.com is a startup community built to help fire protection professionals shine.
Our goal is to improve fire protection practices worldwide. We promote the industry by creating helpful tools and resources, and by bringing together industry professionals to share their expertise.

​MeyerFire, LLC is a NICET Recognized Training Provider and International Code Council Preferred Education Provider.

All text, images, and media ​Copyright © 2016-2025 MeyerFire, LLC

We respect your privacy and personal data. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. 
The views, opinions, and information found on this site represent solely the author and do not represent the opinions of any other party, nor does the presented material assume responsibility for its use. Fire protection and life safety systems constitute a critical component for public health and safety and you should consult with a licensed professional for proper design and code adherence.

Discussions are solely for the purpose of peer review and the exchange of ideas. All comments are reviewed. Comments which do not contribute, are not relevant, are spam, or are disrespectful in nature may be removed. Information presented and opinions expressed should not be relied upon as a replacement for consulting services. Some (not all) outbound links on this website, such as Amazon links, are affiliate-based where we receive a small commission for orders placed elsewhere.

  • Blog
  • Forum
  • TOOLKIT
    • ALL TOOLS
    • BUY THE TOOLKIT
  • UNIVERSITY
    • ALL COURSES
    • JOIN THE UNIVERSITY
  • PE Exam
    • PE Forum & Errata
    • PE Store
    • PE Tools
    • PE PREP SERIES
    • PE 100-Day Marathon
  • LOGIN
    • TOOLKIT-ONLY LOGIN
    • UNIVERSITY LOGIN
  • STORE
  • OUR CAUSE
    • ABOUT MEYERFIRE
    • JOB OPENINGS
    • BECOME AN INSTRUCTOR
    • HELP/SUPPORT