|
I'm working with a not-so-good flow test on a project that will require a pump because of the flow test.
Where this is getting in the muck is the test flow rate being 712 gpm. The hydrant is about 565 feet from the entry and about 4 feet below finished floor elevation. This is a 5-story, light hazard with 2 standpipes, so the standpipe demand is 750 gpm. Flow test had 44 psi static and 34 psi residual with a 0.9 coefficient through the 2.5" outlet. As you know this is a 750 gpm system demand. The person over me is adamant that we not separate the sprinkler and standpipe systems out - sprinklers and then standpipe - by code when it comes to fire pumps. Even though this is a low-rise building and all we are technically concerned with is an automatic sprinkler system, and if the responding FD has an engine/pumper, the manual standpipe is in their realm. The argument is that they don't want a "partially automatic system" on any project; if a fire pump is to be provided for the project, they insist that the standpipe system connected to it must also be automatic. Back to the 750 gpm thing. At 34 psi, we have 712 gpm, obviously. The thing here is putting a 111 psi, 750 gpm pump on. They're concerned with the NPSH of the pump and not the duty point or the 150% rated test goals. (1) When a fire pump is provided to meet the needs of the sprinkler system, are the standpipes required to be automatic? (2) Is there a requirement here for automatic standpipes that I'm missing? The local jurisdiction has no amendments that affect standpipe requirements different than the model IBC. (3) Is an automatic standpipe here even achievable given the limits of the water supply, or are we causing more issues in testing down the road? If it was local, the FMs have already told me that's close enough and we will make up any flow from our trucks. What am I missing here? I understand clearly that at 20 psi the flow is 1,124 gpm. That's not what I'm trying to accomplish. I am attempting to make the combined system fully automatic per policy at 750 gpm and I'm told it's all good to go. Help a man at wit's end out here. TLDR: How would you approach manual vs. automatic standpipes when a fire pump is provided for a 5-story sprinkler system, but a 750 gpm pump could overtax the water supply? Sent in anonymously for discussion. Click Title to View | Submit Your Question | Subscribe
7 Comments
10/22/2025 07:58:49 am
My approach would be an automatic sprinkler system with the pump as needed, interconnected standpipes but designed for Manual and using the local AHJ pumper truck capabilities for that water supply. That is a typical SOP for design of buildings with floors in the 30'-75' realm based on available water supply. Signage on the FDC will be key for the responding pumper truck and engineer.
Reply
Glenn Berger
10/22/2025 08:15:17 am
1) Standpipe System can be Manual Wet Class I type iaw NFPA 14. It does not matter that the building is provided with fire sprinkler system(s).
Reply
Anthony
10/22/2025 08:45:41 am
Reply
Casey Milhorn
10/22/2025 08:50:00 am
Dan and Glenn nailed it. The only thing I would add is to make sure the path from the FDC(s) to the hose valves are sized no smaller than 4", but should be sized larger if required by a manual standpipe calculation, using the responding fire departments fire pumper supply information. Remember to provide signage at the FDC that signifies a manual standpipe and the required pressure. IF the fire department can and will energize the system to more than 175 psi, make sure you take that into account for your materials used in the systems. It's not a bad strategy to keep your required static psi to 175 psi in your manual standpipe calcs, and then to signify that on your signage. This avoids the 175 issue and should reduce your exposure if the fire department supplied excess pressure and has a failure. BUT, if the fire department says they will pump to over 175 psi regardless of signage as their SOP, I would consider this.
Reply
Donnie
10/22/2025 11:28:23 am
Yes, manual standpipes are allowed where the building is fully sprinkled. The fire truck pumper can then satisfy the pressure needed at the top most remote outlet of 100psi. If you need more bpm, open another hose outlet to get 750 combined total flow. Should be easy.
Reply
Jerry Clark
10/22/2025 01:32:22 pm
For a 5-story light hazard building under the model IBC (without local amendments), standpipe systems are required but are allowed to be manual wet. NFPA 14 and IBC typically require automatic standpipes only for high-rise buildings over 75 feet or special conditions. Your building's standpipes do NOT need to be automatic simply because a fire pump is installed for sprinklers.
Reply
Jack G
10/22/2025 05:42:13 pm
Both NFPA 14 and the IBC would allow a manual wet standpipe system here. Calculation would be from a hydrant to a pumper truck thru the fdc to the standpipe system usually calculated with the flow( here 750 gpm) at 150 psi. The standpipes shall be a minimum of 4 inch. Some times if the hydrant is too far away to calculate 100 psi with the 150 fire department pressure the AHJ will allow what the max pressure the fire department can provide.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
ALL-ACCESSSUBSCRIBESubscribe and learn something new each day:
COMMUNITYTop Nov '25 Contributors
YOUR POSTPE EXAMGet 100 Days of Free Sample Questions right to you!
FILTERS
All
ARCHIVES
December 2025
PE PREP SERIES |
RSS Feed
